Six major conference commissioners urge a Louisville judge to reject an extra year of eligibility for athletes who entered college in 2022.
- Thread starter BBN9
- Start date
Why do they only care about this one and not the rest?
Something tells me if it was an Alabama football player the SEC would feel different. They've never cared about basketball and its the reason why we continue to get unfavorable whistles in Rupp but there are major rule changes if Bama gets a questionable call at Bryant Denny.
I suspect Sankey is liked by a lot of folks...I'm not one of them. The way he let Carolina off the hook - scot free - for their academic fraud is a crime for which he should be hammered unmercifully.
Judges historically like being told what to do…
They crave power, and they have been powerless for sometime.
Makes no sense because it's the same thing that will be happening every year after this one so why does it matter so much about the 2022 class.
Why this one and not the others? I don't get it
Exactly it’s total BS.
Those fargin icehole corksucking bastages.
Johnny Dangerously. lol. “Fargin bastages” must have been repeated a million times in the mid 80s.
I would like to direct this to the distinguished members of the panel: You lousy cork-soakers. You have violated my farging rights. Dis somanumbatching country was founded so that the liberties of common patriotic citizens like me could not be taken away by a bunch of fargin iceholes... like yourselves.
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....what?
How would Sankey have anything to do with that? He presides over the SEC. North Carolina is in the ACC.
So...
What the hell are you talking about?
I said exactly when this was filed that the SEC and NCAA would fight the Louisville lawsuit with all their might. If it benefits UK, that’s where they will draw the line. People who don’t see the bias just don’t want to.
Sankey was appointed head of the committee that ruled on UNC's case.
It's amazing how unaware people are of college sports history. Sankey was the Chief Officer of the NCAA's investigation that took six....six years to come to a conclusion.
My guess is that you were alive when the decision made national news in 2017...I'll ask you...what the hell are you talking about?
Honestly I don't have an issue with them opposing another year for these players, because lets face it this insanity needs to end; but i see no reason they oppose only this case.
The only acceptable exceptions are if this case has a plaintiff that has really weird facts that we just dont know or if they opposed all these.
I don’t believe a single lawsuit asking for portal entrance has been turned down. If it has, I’ve not heard of it. The Louisville one will probably be the first. The NCAA and every conference is fighting ours specifically contacting the Judge and urging him to rule against it. Political Pressure.
Fighting this one even with the fact that Sankey can still block Mitchell with the inter conference loophole. Mitch Barnharts school last again. Sankey even pleaded with UK Not to let Mitch go.
My guess is the guy who didn’t know how corrupt Sankey was from the UNC scandal. Doesn’t know Sankey pleaded with UK to keep Barnhart.
I fully believe the NCAA coached UNC on what to say and do. It was too big of a scandal going on for too long and would have wiped out 18 years of their history across multiple sports. Couldn't have that happening.
It really doesn’t matter. If the Judge allows Mitchell to enter the portal, Sankey we block an inter conference transfer. Sankey will never allow Mitchell to play here and I would be willing to bet money on that.
Latest
-
01
KSR
South Carolina will be without critical line of scrimmage players to start season
-
02
KSR
Jaxon Kohler narrows choice to two options with decision expected Thursday
-
03
KSR
Sources Say goes LIVE with Joe Tipton to talk Jaxon Kohler and Mark Mitchell
-
04
KSR
Jimmey Sequin becomes third Michigan native to join Kentucky's 2028 class
-
05
KSR
Kentucky MBB announces date for exhibition vs. Texas Tech