BIG roster payroll ranking
- Thread starter 85Bears
- Start date
How much of that $24 million is going to one guy -- I'm-a-leavin?
Deshaun Foster, you could randomly take any HS coach in Iowa and have a much better coached team.
Iowa definitely punches above their weight class, that's for sure. Makes you appreciate the culture that Kirk has instilled in the program, carrying on Coach Fry's scrappy, winning culture and evolving it into a rock solid consistent program.
Does that include revenue sharing? Some of those numbers seem a bit low...
Kirk and company have been successful for years without the pay-for-play dollars or the geographical advantages of population, weather and football prospects.
They do more with less and are one heck of a developmental program.
Looked at a site called NIL- NCAA.
They had oregon at 28 million in nil for FB with Iowa at 8 million.
Iowa is in the bottom 5 tier for nil.
Not an even playing field for Iowa vs,mich,OSU,oregon,wash,usc,psu ect.
This years schedule we will be nil underdogs to Michigan,OSU,wash,wis.,neb,illinois, but favorites vs NW, Purdue,minny.
Could be a long year.
Our operating net last year was a - 36 million
That was the 5th smallest deficit.
Everyone in the BIG took operating losses last year.
So .much for the schools reaping " billions" ....the athletes are the only ones making money...jeremiah smith of OSU is at 4.2 million
This is unsustainable.
They had oregon at 28 million in nil for FB with Iowa at 8 million.
Iowa is in the bottom 5 tier for nil.
Not an even playing field for Iowa vs,mich,OSU,oregon,wash,usc,psu ect.
This years schedule we will be nil underdogs to Michigan,OSU,wash,wis.,neb,illinois, but favorites vs NW, Purdue,minny.
Could be a long year.
Our operating net last year was a - 36 million
That was the 5th smallest deficit.
Everyone in the BIG took operating losses last year.
So .much for the schools reaping " billions" ....the athletes are the only ones making money...jeremiah smith of OSU is at 4.2 million
This is unsustainable.
Success as it relates to player development - Multiple consensus all americans. I think we are 1 of 1 when it comes to consecutive years of multiple consensus all americans. When you couple that with the fact that the majority of the players we get are 3 star, that's wildly successful. NFL draft picks. KF has had over 100 in his tenure. Also wildly successful.
Success as it relates to W's and L's - we are in pretty select company when it comes to P4 teams with consecutive seasons of 8 or more wins. I think it's us, OSU, Georgia, and Alabama. I'd say that's wildly successful as well. Again, especially considering recruiting, geographic location, population, etc.
The one thing missing from our resume, of course, is a playoff appearance. I'd like to think that's coming in the next couple of years.
Be some interesting stats in a few years where they break down W-L against teams based on payroll matchup.
Iowa has averaged 8-4 under KF. Where are you getting an average of 9 plus wins per year? .
Success to me means winning as many games as possible. KF is 8-4 on average at Iowa.
last 11 years averages at 9-4 (10 years is 8.6-4.1, so cherry picked to add 11th year which was 2015). it’s been closer to 9 wins than 8 for a long time
That's a win % of 67%. Do you know how many P4 teams have a better winning % over that span of time?
The “P4” is basically a P2 now. And remind me: how many of those supposedly inferior P2 programs have made the playoff?
Iowa: 0.
Eight wins and a nice bowl game every year isn’t success. It’s reruns. Same movie, same ending—just a different December.
And? Outside of Indiana the last 2 seasons, what other schools have risen up to change the status quo? Talking Heads, take it from here...
Ole miss and Texas tech qualified this past season for their first playoffs, Miami is an old coke fueled champion. I wouldn't say any of them have changed anything about the perennial top teams. With the expanded playoffs I think Iowa makes one before Kirk leaves.
Anyone expecting the offense to suddenly look different this year probably hasn’t been watching Kirkball for the last 27 years. The philosophy has always been pretty simple: control the ball, limit mistakes, win field position, and let the defense and special teams do the heavy lifting. It’s not flashy, and it never will be.
The problem is that this style only works when you have an elite defense, a serviceable defensive line, and special teams that consistently tilt the field in your favor. I’m not convinced we have all of those pieces this year.
Call me pessimistic, but with this many question marks, I think 7–5 is the ceiling. I see losses to Michigan, Ohio State, Washington, Illinois, and then one more somewhere along the way, likely Minnesota or another toss-up game. Until proven otherwise, expecting Kirkball to suddenly become something it hasn’t been for nearly three decades feels like wishful thinking (Tim Lester, Brian Ferentz or Ken O’Keefe it doesn’t matter the philosophy is the same).
The problem is that this style only works when you have an elite defense, a serviceable defensive line, and special teams that consistently tilt the field in your favor. I’m not convinced we have all of those pieces this year.
Call me pessimistic, but with this many question marks, I think 7–5 is the ceiling. I see losses to Michigan, Ohio State, Washington, Illinois, and then one more somewhere along the way, likely Minnesota or another toss-up game. Until proven otherwise, expecting Kirkball to suddenly become something it hasn’t been for nearly three decades feels like wishful thinking (Tim Lester, Brian Ferentz or Ken O’Keefe it doesn’t matter the philosophy is the same).
Latest
-
01
On3
Calling My Shot: Predicting who wins top quarterback battles in college football
-
02
Hawkeye Report
Status Report: Iowa Football's biggest questions
-
03
Hawkeye Report
Iowa Football Camp Question: Defensive Line
-
04
Rivals
2027 Rivals150: 6 prospects poised to make major jumps in next rankings update
-
05
On3
2027 Bracketology: Latest way-too-early NCAA Tournament projections after 5-for-5 decisions