hopefultiger: I'm responding to your post, but it could have been any number of different posts. So many posters case on the WNBA, on womens' basketball, or both, because it is far less athletic than NBA basketball. And it is.
But womens' basketball and mens' basketball are two completely different games. That's the case with every single comparison of the mens' and womens' versions of a given sport. IMHO, the problem lies with viewers who go in expecting that the womens' game is gonna be a close approximation of the mens' game. They're always going to be disappointed.
But if you pay any attention (and clearly, you are under no obligation to do so), you will note that the womens' game has grown in athleticism and athletic skill over time. Some years back, you would NEVER see a woman shooting a jumper from 20 feet out without hoisting it from her midsection, as opposed to shooting it with the kind of motion men have long used (hands over their head, with essentially a one handed wrist flick). There are a few women who can even dunk the ball now. That was certainly not the case back in the day.
The womens' game will continue to evolve, just as the mens' game has evolved over time. There was a time, albeit long ago, when major college mens' basketball players all employed a two-handed, flat footed set shot on all shots from outside. Hank Luisetti, who played at Stanford from 1935 to 1939,, revolutionized outside shooting by popularizing the running one-handed push shot—an early precursor to the jump shot.