Will this make you feel better if we get boatraced by these clearly mediocre teams compared to the top of the conference? Our schedule is very conducive to 4-6 conference wins. Anything less than 4 should be grounds for a new coach…period.
Who is talking about “feeling better” about anything? The reality is we have 2 automatic wins on the calendar, and paper predictive metrics suchas ESPN analytics that correlate with the Vegas odds only have us as a projected favorite in 2 other games. They give us a 56% chance of beating Michigan State and a 53% chance of beating BC. These are hardly slam dunk odds. Our projected odds of beating Indiana, USC, PSU, and Michigan are all under 20% and the projected odds of us beating Wisconsin per ESPN are 28%. Odds vs NW, Maryland and Nebraska are in the 30s.
So in summary - to go 7-5 he’d not only have to go 2-0 in the toss up games where we are favored slightly, but also win 3 games against teams that currently project as heavy paper favorites vs us (3 wins that would, as of today, qualify as upsets).
The bottom line is, the decision isn’t binary in terms of whether Greg alone has a body of work deserving of a return in 2027. If all teams on the schedule turn out as expected (which of course won’t happen, but hypothetically speaking here), a 6-6 record would mean Johansen came in and did a very solid job improving a rock bottom defense and the offense did not implode. Greg’s not getting an extension with this outcome, but Zinn isn’t wiping out our defensive staff after that type of one year showing either. 6-6 would represent progress over prior year 5-7 - albeit modest, but enough for her to work with in building the brand. Our fans don’t want to hear this - but a quick radical change isn’t in Rutgers best long term interest based on where we are at in what she’s working towards. The only way we wipe out the coaching staff and start new in 2027 is if we’re forced to.