Pirro drops reflecting pool charges

[St. Louis Hawk]

I never said i was looking.

I never said i was looking.

“We have video showing leftist wackos trying to damage the reflecting pool.” - TigerGrowls

So the Admin either lied to you about the existence of these videos or just dismissed the prosecutions despite the existence of these videos.

One is bad, the other is worse.

Which is it?

 

[noleclone2]

At what point do the republicans come to terms their King is mentally gone due to a combination of megalomania and dementia. He has no business being in a position where his minions brainlessly follow his orders. I think some of them are realizing he won’t be around much longer to protect them.

 

[Huey Grey 2]

You libs just don't get it. Liner. Top notch pool guy. Potomac River. Crooked Joe. Leaking since 1939. Beautiful job. It's so common sense. Best job since Iran, really.

 

[GesterHawk]

Charging him with a felony with insufficient evidence.

No he wasn’t - as the DOJ has now admitted.

Who was held for 2 years without trial and did they waive their speedy trial rights?

She wasn’t arrested for the selfie.

You forgot that he was absolutely vilified by the administration and now 33% of the voters in this country truly believe him to be a felon.

 

[UrHuckleberry]

At what point do the republicans come to terms their King is mentally gone due to a combination of megalomania and dementia. He has no business being in a position where his minions brainlessly follow his orders. I think some of them are realizing he won’t be around much longer to protect them.

They either already have or they never will.

I get why people will disagree, but I still believe many of them are good people who have just gone too far, and made it their identity and just can't get out. They can't let their mind/heart believe that they've been duped to the level they have. Obviously many of them I don't think are good people either, and likely even know who and what he is, they just don't care.

But so many of his actions this term have been so openly and brazenly corrupt, that if they don't at this point, they've just decided not to or can't allow themselves to.

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

You forgot that he was absolutely vilified by the administration and now 33% of the voters in this country truly believe him to be a felon.

And his legal fees …

 

[Anon1750875978]

Trump's lips are moving, he's lying.

Remarkable situation we're in as Americans.
And the cult can't admit they've been duped.

Midterms gonna be great.

 

[lucas80]

Sure he lied about the vandalism. But everything else he says is true, like the stollen 2020 election!

And, that's what scares me about November. Even when his own people tell him something didn't happen, he demands his reality be accepted. Pirro didn't go along with it this time. What happens in November when Trump orders Paul Pate to hold up the certification of Iowa's elections because 1-2 House seats, maybe the Senate seat, and maybe Terrace Hill is getting a Dem occupant?

 

[lucas80]

At what point do the republicans come to terms their King is mentally gone due to a combination of megalomania and dementia. He has no business being in a position where his minions brainlessly follow his orders. I think some of them are realizing he won’t be around much longer to protect them.

We are there. The full on cult members will never leave his side. The casual voters are wandering away.
It's the violence that the full on cult members are willing to commit that should scare the rest of us.

 

[dpic73]

We are there. The full on cult members will never leave his side. The casual voters are wandering away.
It's the violence that the full on cult members are willing to commit that should scare the rest of us.

"There was once a time when he just told lies and didn’t care whether what came out of his mouth was true or not. Now he’s convinced himself that whatever he says is true, because to confront reality in any way would crush his fragile ego. He has decompensated to the point of being psychotic. And he’s only going to get worse."

 

[dgordo]

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/04/us/politics/trump-jeanine-pirro-showdown.html?unlocked_article_code=1.21A.Kiha.FG15d29m0zZm&smid=nytcore-ios-share

Inside the Oval Office Showdown Between Trump and Jeanine Pirro​

Jeanine Pirro had had it up to here with Doug Burgum. The famously voluble U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia strode into the Oval Office late Monday with her future on the line and the interior secretary, whom she privately called an incompetent liar, in her cross hairs.

A few hours earlier — in front of the cameras, from the Resolute Desk — President Trump had accused Ms. Pirro, an ally and friend from New York going back decades, of “folding like an umbrella” and “choking” after she withdrew charges against a man accused of destroying the lining of his beloved but shoddily renovated Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.
Why was he so angry at her? Because Ms. Pirro had dared to publicly demolish one of his most cherished narratives, promoted by Mr. Burgum, that vandals — and not a contractor hired by the Interior Department to do a rushed job — had defaced a Washington landmark.

Mr. Trump raged against Ms. Pirro in private on Monday. Then he raged a little to reporters. Rumors she would be fired burbled through West Wing. Then he raged a little bit more before hosting a meeting with Ms. Pirro at the White House, for a high-drama, face-to-face meeting worthy of two decorated veterans of confrontational reality TV.

Mr. Burgum had been invited too, so Ms. Pirro came prepared. She entered the White House from the West Executive driveway in a bright red blazer that matched her fight-back mood, schlepping a white box containing evidence, plus a black box with documents, on wheels.

Doug Burgum, the interior secretary, during a meeting in the Oval Office last month. Ms. Pirro accused him of misleading the president about what had happened to the Reflecting Pool.Credit...Alex Kent/The New York Times
Waiting for her in the Oval Office, along with the president: Mr. Trump’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles, and David Warrington, the White House counsel.

After about an hour of intense back-and-forth, Ms. Pirro emerged with her job intact, for now.
During the meeting, Ms. Pirro, her voice raised at times, directly confronted Mr. Burgum, accusing him of misleading the president. She made the case that Mr. Burgum had promoted a self-serving cover story to conceal his own missteps.
Mr. Burgum spoke less, but did his best to defend himself, according to a person briefed on the exchange requesting anonymity to discuss internal conversations.

Mr. Trump seemed considerably less angry by day’s end, the person said.
Spokespeople for the White House, Ms. Pirro and Mr. Burgum did not respond to requests for comment.

This account, based on interviews with several people with knowledge of the events, demonstrated a core truth of Mr. Trump’s second term: Anyone willing to contradict the president is in trouble, even if the dissenter happens to be a family friend who has faithfully executed his prosecutorial agenda over the years.

The saga began on July 2, when a fired-up Ms. Pirro appeared before members of the news the media to announce that her office had indicted David Hearn, 67, a former Olympic canoeist, on a single count of felony vandalism after he had been observed damaging the pool lining.

Ms. Pirro speaking at a news conference to announce the indictment of David Hearn on July 2.Credit...Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

“This is not only a priority for the president, but for myself,” Ms. Pirro said, adding: “We will prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Hearn willfully destroyed property.”

She did not. Last Friday, Ms. Pirro beat a humbling prosecutorial retreat in a 20-page court filing, admitting that her fast-track July indictment of the three-time Olympian had been based on false assumptions and incomplete evidence.
The document amounted to an indictment of sorts of Mr. Burgum; the contractor hired to repair the pool, Atlantic Industrial Coatings; and U.S. Park Police officials.

Ms. Pirro’s filing suggested that Mr. Burgum had committed the twofold sin of failing to competently oversee the renovation, then prodding Mr. Trump to accept the vandals-did-it story. Ms. Pirro said that her staff had relied almost exclusively on claims by Interior Department officials that extensive damage to the lining was caused by Mr. Hearn and other vandals who were observed tugging at or removing pieces of material from the wall.

After reviewing thousands of pages of evidence, she concluded the department had rushed and “botched” the renovation, and that bad information from Park Police officials had led her to cite “tremendous evidence” against Mr. Hearn that did not exist.
The whole episode had a vaguely comic air (why would the leader of the free world, juggling war and a wobbly economy, fixate on a pool liner?). But consequences for Mr. Hearn were anything but. The felony charge carried a maximum 10-year prison term, based on an assessment by Ms. Pirro’s team that the damage inflicted amounted to more than $1,000.

National Park Service employees and others inspecting pieces of the Reflecting Pool lining on July 20.Credit...Andrew Leyden for The New York Times

Ms. Pirro knew full well that her U-turn could infuriate Mr. Trump, but decided to cram her filing with enough evidence to decisively disprove Mr. Burgum’s claims.

She gave the White House a heads-up last week before filing the motion to dismiss the charge against Mr. Hearn in federal court, although it was not clear if Mr. Trump was briefed, according to people familiar with the situation who requested anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

Ominous signals from Mr. Trump began to emerge on Saturday morning, a day after Ms. Pirro filed her motion.
“I disagree 100 percent with Jeanine Pirro,” Mr. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. “I don’t know what she was thinking? To me, it was a pure case of VANDALISM.” He added, “There may have been some contractor difficulty, but the major damage was caused by VANDALS!”

Mr. Burgum took to social media to defend himself soon afterward. His staff “provided the U.S. attorney’s office expert and eyewitness testimony to the damage done by vandals and provided every piece of evidence they asked for in the requested time line detailing each area of damage at the pool,” he wrote.

Mr. Trump seems at first to have taken Mr. Burgum’s side, and grew steadily angrier at Ms. Pirro as the weekend ground on.
By mid-Monday, he pounced when asked a Pirro question at a press availability in the Oval Office, saying he was disappointed and accusing Ms. Pirro of being too afraid to present the case to the judge in the Hearn case.

President Donald J. Trump gesturing in a cutting motion while speaking about the Reflecting Pool damage in the Oval Office on Monday.Credit...Doug Mills/The New York Times

Notably, he did not answer a question from a reporter about Ms. Pirro’s future employment.
Why Ms. Pirro, who knows Mr. Trump’s personality and trigger points better than almost anyone outside his family, was willing to risk the president’s wrath remains somewhat unclear.

After reviewing thousands of pages of evidence over the past few weeks — much of it from Mr. Hearn’s defense team — Ms. Pirro determined the Hearn indictment needed to be rescinded before it was thrown out of court, according to two people close to the situation.

Her critics have questioned whether her motive was nearly so straightforward or altruistic.
They suggest that Ms. Pirro’s decision to withdraw the indictment was self-protective: She might be trying to head off disciplinary action that could result if grand jury testimony or other internal materials are made public. Mr. Hearn’s lawyers said she was guilty of what she had accused Mr. Burgum of doing — rushing to take an action to appease her boss — and that she had ample access, before indicting Mr. Hearn, to evidence showing that the damage had been caused by the contractor.
The contractor, Atlantic Industrial Coatings, has not responded to queries about the case, but a June 21 statement on the company’s website says there are “some areas” of the pool that require repairs.

Ms. Pirro, who rose to prominence in the jostling New York City tabloid market alongside Mr. Trump, has also demonstrated a greater sense of independence than many other senior department officials, whose careers have been entirely made (and can be unmade) by Mr. Trump.

She left a far higher-paying job at Fox News to take over the U.S. attorney job, is lukewarm on Washington, and has told friends (some of them skeptical) that she sees her current post as a capstone, not a steppingstone, and does not fear a “you’re fired” moment.

Yet, by all accounts, Ms. Pirro offered a spirited defense of herself on Friday, and appears determined to win her battle with Mr. Burgum and, eventually, win back Mr. Trump.

 

[TigerGrowls]

“We have video showing leftist wackos trying to damage the reflecting pool.” - TigerGrowls

So the Admin either lied to you about the existence of these videos or just dismissed the prosecutions despite the existence of these videos.

One is bad, the other is worse.

Which is it?

Quit acting silly dude. They do have video. Its just the whole case is not sound so they dropped it unlike the commie dems who hrld j6ers in the DC gulag with no bail or a trial for years.

 

[lucas80]

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/04/us/politics/trump-jeanine-pirro-showdown.html?unlocked_article_code=1.21A.Kiha.FG15d29m0zZm&smid=nytcore-ios-share

Inside the Oval Office Showdown Between Trump and Jeanine Pirro​

Jeanine Pirro had had it up to here with Doug Burgum. The famously voluble U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia strode into the Oval Office late Monday with her future on the line and the interior secretary, whom she privately called an incompetent liar, in her cross hairs.

A few hours earlier — in front of the cameras, from the Resolute Desk — President Trump had accused Ms. Pirro, an ally and friend from New York going back decades, of “folding like an umbrella” and “choking” after she withdrew charges against a man accused of destroying the lining of his beloved but shoddily renovated Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.
Why was he so angry at her? Because Ms. Pirro had dared to publicly demolish one of his most cherished narratives, promoted by Mr. Burgum, that vandals — and not a contractor hired by the Interior Department to do a rushed job — had defaced a Washington landmark.

Mr. Trump raged against Ms. Pirro in private on Monday. Then he raged a little to reporters. Rumors she would be fired burbled through West Wing. Then he raged a little bit more before hosting a meeting with Ms. Pirro at the White House, for a high-drama, face-to-face meeting worthy of two decorated veterans of confrontational reality TV.

Mr. Burgum had been invited too, so Ms. Pirro came prepared. She entered the White House from the West Executive driveway in a bright red blazer that matched her fight-back mood, schlepping a white box containing evidence, plus a black box with documents, on wheels.

Doug Burgum, the interior secretary, during a meeting in the Oval Office last month. Ms. Pirro accused him of misleading the president about what had happened to the Reflecting Pool.Credit...Alex Kent/The New York Times
Waiting for her in the Oval Office, along with the president: Mr. Trump’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles, and David Warrington, the White House counsel.

After about an hour of intense back-and-forth, Ms. Pirro emerged with her job intact, for now.
During the meeting, Ms. Pirro, her voice raised at times, directly confronted Mr. Burgum, accusing him of misleading the president. She made the case that Mr. Burgum had promoted a self-serving cover story to conceal his own missteps.
Mr. Burgum spoke less, but did his best to defend himself, according to a person briefed on the exchange requesting anonymity to discuss internal conversations.

Mr. Trump seemed considerably less angry by day’s end, the person said.
Spokespeople for the White House, Ms. Pirro and Mr. Burgum did not respond to requests for comment.

This account, based on interviews with several people with knowledge of the events, demonstrated a core truth of Mr. Trump’s second term: Anyone willing to contradict the president is in trouble, even if the dissenter happens to be a family friend who has faithfully executed his prosecutorial agenda over the years.

The saga began on July 2, when a fired-up Ms. Pirro appeared before members of the news the media to announce that her office had indicted David Hearn, 67, a former Olympic canoeist, on a single count of felony vandalism after he had been observed damaging the pool lining.

Ms. Pirro speaking at a news conference to announce the indictment of David Hearn on July 2.Credit...Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

“This is not only a priority for the president, but for myself,” Ms. Pirro said, adding: “We will prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Hearn willfully destroyed property.”

She did not. Last Friday, Ms. Pirro beat a humbling prosecutorial retreat in a 20-page court filing, admitting that her fast-track July indictment of the three-time Olympian had been based on false assumptions and incomplete evidence.
The document amounted to an indictment of sorts of Mr. Burgum; the contractor hired to repair the pool, Atlantic Industrial Coatings; and U.S. Park Police officials.

Ms. Pirro’s filing suggested that Mr. Burgum had committed the twofold sin of failing to competently oversee the renovation, then prodding Mr. Trump to accept the vandals-did-it story. Ms. Pirro said that her staff had relied almost exclusively on claims by Interior Department officials that extensive damage to the lining was caused by Mr. Hearn and other vandals who were observed tugging at or removing pieces of material from the wall.

After reviewing thousands of pages of evidence, she concluded the department had rushed and “botched” the renovation, and that bad information from Park Police officials had led her to cite “tremendous evidence” against Mr. Hearn that did not exist.
The whole episode had a vaguely comic air (why would the leader of the free world, juggling war and a wobbly economy, fixate on a pool liner?). But consequences for Mr. Hearn were anything but. The felony charge carried a maximum 10-year prison term, based on an assessment by Ms. Pirro’s team that the damage inflicted amounted to more than $1,000.

National Park Service employees and others inspecting pieces of the Reflecting Pool lining on July 20.Credit...Andrew Leyden for The New York Times

Ms. Pirro knew full well that her U-turn could infuriate Mr. Trump, but decided to cram her filing with enough evidence to decisively disprove Mr. Burgum’s claims.

She gave the White House a heads-up last week before filing the motion to dismiss the charge against Mr. Hearn in federal court, although it was not clear if Mr. Trump was briefed, according to people familiar with the situation who requested anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

Ominous signals from Mr. Trump began to emerge on Saturday morning, a day after Ms. Pirro filed her motion.
“I disagree 100 percent with Jeanine Pirro,” Mr. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. “I don’t know what she was thinking? To me, it was a pure case of VANDALISM.” He added, “There may have been some contractor difficulty, but the major damage was caused by VANDALS!”

Mr. Burgum took to social media to defend himself soon afterward. His staff “provided the U.S. attorney’s office expert and eyewitness testimony to the damage done by vandals and provided every piece of evidence they asked for in the requested time line detailing each area of damage at the pool,” he wrote.

Mr. Trump seems at first to have taken Mr. Burgum’s side, and grew steadily angrier at Ms. Pirro as the weekend ground on.
By mid-Monday, he pounced when asked a Pirro question at a press availability in the Oval Office, saying he was disappointed and accusing Ms. Pirro of being too afraid to present the case to the judge in the Hearn case.

President Donald J. Trump gesturing in a cutting motion while speaking about the Reflecting Pool damage in the Oval Office on Monday.Credit...Doug Mills/The New York Times

Notably, he did not answer a question from a reporter about Ms. Pirro’s future employment.
Why Ms. Pirro, who knows Mr. Trump’s personality and trigger points better than almost anyone outside his family, was willing to risk the president’s wrath remains somewhat unclear.

After reviewing thousands of pages of evidence over the past few weeks — much of it from Mr. Hearn’s defense team — Ms. Pirro determined the Hearn indictment needed to be rescinded before it was thrown out of court, according to two people close to the situation.

Her critics have questioned whether her motive was nearly so straightforward or altruistic.
They suggest that Ms. Pirro’s decision to withdraw the indictment was self-protective: She might be trying to head off disciplinary action that could result if grand jury testimony or other internal materials are made public. Mr. Hearn’s lawyers said she was guilty of what she had accused Mr. Burgum of doing — rushing to take an action to appease her boss — and that she had ample access, before indicting Mr. Hearn, to evidence showing that the damage had been caused by the contractor.
The contractor, Atlantic Industrial Coatings, has not responded to queries about the case, but a June 21 statement on the company’s website says there are “some areas” of the pool that require repairs.

Ms. Pirro, who rose to prominence in the jostling New York City tabloid market alongside Mr. Trump, has also demonstrated a greater sense of independence than many other senior department officials, whose careers have been entirely made (and can be unmade) by Mr. Trump.

She left a far higher-paying job at Fox News to take over the U.S. attorney job, is lukewarm on Washington, and has told friends (some of them skeptical) that she sees her current post as a capstone, not a steppingstone, and does not fear a “you’re fired” moment.

Yet, by all accounts, Ms. Pirro offered a spirited defense of herself on Friday, and appears determined to win her battle with Mr. Burgum and, eventually, win back Mr. Trump.

So, Pirro is the hero in this story?
I wonder if Susie Wiles will track down all the leakers in this story?

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

Quit acting silly dude. They do have video. Its just the whole case is not sound so they dropped it unlike the commie dems who hrld j6ers in the DC gulag with no bail or a trial for years.

So they have video of people destroying the liner but don’t have a sound case?

Have you seen these videos or are you taking the DOJ’s word?

And again, which J6er spent years in jail without bail that didn’t waive their right to a speedy trial? Do you have a name? Link?

 

[fskillet]

So they have video of people destroying the liner but don’t have a sound case?

Have you seen these videos or are you taking the DOJ’s word?

And again, which J6er spent years in jail without bail that didn’t waive their right to a speedy trial? Do you have a name? Link?

They do have video, it's just not of any of these "saboteurs" damaging the liner. It's of Trump's ****** contractor screwing up the job and scrambling to find a scapegoat for cronyism and incompetence.

 

[Ferentzin04]

So they have video of people destroying the liner but don’t have a sound case?

Have you seen these videos or are you taking the DOJ’s word?

And again, which J6er spent years in jail without bail that didn’t waive their right to a speedy trial? Do you have a name? Link?

he has a name AND a link. Unfortunately he’s keeping it with the video of people destroying the liner, so we’ll probably never see it.

 

[pjhawk]

So, Pirro is the hero in this story?
I wonder if Susie Wiles will track down all the leakers in this story?

It's infuriating that the NY Times is playing this as a soap opera instead of as a crime:

Max Kennerly (@maxkennerly.bsky.social)

This is a story about the President and several of his hand-picked appointees all committing crimes and blatantly lying to the public while stealing public funds and abusing the criminal justice system, but the NYTimes describes the situation like they're recapping a soap opera. [contains quote...

bsky.app

 

[Anon1750875978]

And, that's what scares me about November. Even when his own people tell him something didn't happen, he demands his reality be accepted. Pirro didn't go along with it this time. What happens in November when Trump orders Paul Pate to hold up the certification of Iowa's elections because 1-2 House seats, maybe the Senate seat, and maybe Terrace Hill is getting a Dem occupant?

History has shown that Trump loses more court cases than he wins.

Whether he loses before or after an appeal, he usually loses.

One thing I predict in a year from now, Assley Hinson will be in the Senate.
She will lose to Turek, but when Rob Sand wins in November, Grassley resigns in December and drunk Kimmie appoints Hinson to his seat.

 

[aCEOuProbablyKnow]

Fair- I wasn't trying to make a black and white statement about the ignore piece necessarily (gibbs/his alts probs should be on ignore obvi) but rather a posture of actually understanding how this all (maga bs) happened again is worth engaging with, rather than being blind to.

Hotel (imo) shouldn't be on ignore because he's coming after someone who has experienced oppression and bullying their entire existence (tarpon) and we shouldn't ignore him- he should be shunned. Hotel also does it to the Black Community as well, and has said the n word repeatedly on this forum just this week.

Nigga, puhlease. Who is yo' honky *** tryna disrespect a "Black Community" downlow man?!

And, Negro? Why did you call a proud caucazoid woman of @TarponSpringsNole 's stature, and height, and with a big ol' sweaty bay hog, "their" instead of the "SHE" that he deserves?

Is MISSgendering part of your whole honky oppression outfit?

Let's unpack that, yeah?

 

[tigres88]

Nigga, puhlease. Who is yo' honky *** tryna disrespect a "Black Community" downlow man?!

And, Negro? Why did you call a proud caucazoid woman of @TarponSpringsNole 's stature, and height, and with a big ol' sweaty bay hog, "their" instead of the "SHE" that he deserves?

Is MISSgendering part of your whole honky oppression outfit?

Let's unpack that, yeah?

Wasted at 8:30 pm on a Tuesday is really not it. I posted this days ago, and you have been very active since. The fact you're responding now is sad at best, and a cry for help at worst.

Please get help.

 

[aCEOuProbablyKnow]

Wasted at 8:30 pm on a Tuesday is really not it. I posted this days ago, and you have been very active since. The fact you're responding now is sad at best, and a cry for help at worst.

Please get help.

Nobody tagged me, my nigga!

Also, LOLZ how you honkies think everyone is in your timezone. I'm WASTED at 5:30, you Clemsophag.

@TarponSpringsNole is an old man who jerks himself off thinking about how many 50-year-old dudes on HROT (or whatever this ROT-iteration is) "believe" his crusty old, tit-implanted perverted male *** IS a woman.

 

[tigres88]

Nobody tagged me, my nigga!

OK. I fr hope you get the help you need

 

[aCEOuProbablyKnow]

OK. I fr hope you get the help you need

SYBAU, you no-seasonin' honk!

 

[TigerGrowls]

So they have video of people destroying the liner but don’t have a sound case?

Have you seen these videos or are you taking the DOJ’s word?

And again, which J6er spent years in jail without bail that didn’t waive their right to a speedy trial? Do you have a name? Link?

We have a very long thread titled J6. Help yourself. Its common knowledge.

 

[TigerGrowls]

The gay lib joy on this thread over this very small issue is a real indicator of how thoroughly that General Trump has decimated you commiecrats.

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

We have a very long thread titled J6. Help yourself. Its common knowledge.

Feel free to post the link so we can see what video you claim shows “wacko liberals” destroying the liner. I don’t see it.

And since I have now asked three times and you have ignored it each time, I assume you have no names of J6ers who were imprisoned for years before trial who did not waive the speedy trial rights.

Carry on.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Feel free to post the link so we can see what video you claim shows “wacko liberals” destroying the liner. I don’t see it.

And since I have now asked three times and you have ignored it each time, I assume you have no names of J6ers who were imprisoned for years before trial who did not waive the speedy trial rights.

Carry on.

Im not your errand boy. Enjoy your small moral victory here. I'm still with General Trump.

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

Im not your errand boy. Enjoy your small moral victory here. I'm still with General Trump.

LOL.

You were the one that made the claims; you should be able to back them up.

So we now know you don’t have a video of the liner being damaged and don’t have the name of a J6er.

And the fact you say you are still with Trump after he tried to put an innocent man in jail for 10 years with a bogus prosecution to cover up his Administration’s incompetence tells us everything we need to know about you.

 

[Wobmam Rulez!]

They either already have or they never will.

I get why people will disagree, but I still believe many of them are good people who have just gone too far, and made it their identity and just can't get out. They can't let their mind/heart believe that they've been duped to the level they have. Obviously many of them I don't think are good people either, and likely even know who and what he is, they just don't care.

But so many of his actions this term have been so openly and brazenly corrupt, that if they don't at this point, they've just decided not to or can't allow themselves to.

Well then, eff them forever because those aren't people I want to associate with.

 

[Wobmam Rulez!]

The ultimate problem with all of the cases and charges brought against any of the alleged vandals is a "semi" investigation should have been completed.

None were. They all just blindly followed shidstain's orders in order to prosecute people to protect shidstain's fragile ego even though they all knew different.

Everyone is guilty that went along with this and "should" be held accountable. The problem is we have a dept of non justice who are complicit with whatever shidstain's says.

 

[TC_Nole_OX]

 

[UrHuckleberry]

Well then, eff them forever because those aren't people I want to associate with.

Like I said, I get why people will disagree.

 

[TigerGrowls]

LOL.

You were the one that made the claims; you should be able to back them up.

So we now know you don’t have a video of the liner being damaged and don’t have the name of a J6er.

And the fact you say you are still with Trump after he tried to put an innocent man in jail for 10 years with a bogus prosecution to cover up his Administration’s incompetence tells us everything we need to know about you.

Here you go bozo. Go smoke this_shit in your pipe.

 

[RollingballofButcherKnives]

LOL.

You were the one that made the claims; you should be able to back them up.

So we now know you don’t have a video of the liner being damaged and don’t have the name of a J6er.

And the fact you say you are still with Trump after he tried to put an innocent man in jail for 10 years with a bogus prosecution to cover up his Administration’s incompetence tells us everything we need to know about you.

Yep. And the truth doesn’t matter to this dum(b)phuck. As long as the libs get owned.

 

[UrHuckleberry]

Here you go bozo. Go smoke this_shit in your pipe.

Good to know they do, in fact, have video of the pool. Where in that is the 300 foot cut down the middle?

 

[Flie_rivals154594]

Gotta love when Trump staffers get publicly caught between maintaining Trump Truths vs objective reality. Going with objective reality is a career ending move for most of them.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Good to know they do, in fact, have video of the pool. Where in that is the 300 foot cut down the middle?

Go ask the camera guy.

 

[UrHuckleberry]

Go ask the camera guy.

The claim wasn't that someone stuck their arm in the edge of the pool (all that video shows btw), the claim was that vandals took a box cutter to a 250-300 foot section of the middle of the pool.

Like, you have to be embarrassed by this, right? Do you like being lied to? Or have you decided to be like Trump and just never admit when you are wrong, no matter how obvious or silly or how little you give up by admitting it?

 

[TigerGrowls]

The claim wasn't that someone stuck their arm in the edge of the pool (all that video shows btw), the claim was that vandals took a box cutter to a 250-300 foot section of the middle of the pool.

Like, you have to be embarrassed by this, right? Do you like being lied to? Or have you decided to be like Trump and just never admit when you are wrong, no matter how obvious or silly or how little you give up by admitting it?

No. Im not worried at all about it honestly.

 

[UrHuckleberry]

No. Im not worried at all about it honestly.

I just don't understand what is so hard about admitting something was wrong or incorrect. Trump lied because he can't admit he was wrong. It is clear at this point. And is one of his faults in my opinion as a person. I could never have a relationship with a person who could never admit they were wrong, even about miniscule things. You've decided that you support him even with that fault, for whatever reason of your own.

I don't understand the never admit anything mindset and never will. So it is what it is. Have a good day TG.