OnlyFan cam girls have found a lucrative audience of needy, easily manipulated, desperate manchildren . . .

Torbee

Heisman
Sep 13, 2002
13,447
60,267
113

Right-Wing Media and OnlyFans Are in a Symbiotic Relationship​

Crotchety views and crotch views.

Will Sommer
July 30

THERE’S A NEW MAGA PERSONALITY on the scene: Savanna Cannon.

Parroting talking points about wacko liberals and often wearing a Charlie Kirk–style “Freedom” shirt, Cannon looks and sounds like she came straight out of the Turning Point USA or PragerU conservative influencer pipelines.

“People who don’t like what I say are, more than likely, braindead,” Cannon declared in one video last week that sums up her facts-don’t-care-about-your-feelings style.

But Cannon has one big advantage over her rival conservative commentators: she sits in an unusual way.


CANNON’S UNSUBTLE APPROACH to combining politics with sex appeal is just the latest in the symbiotic relationship developing between right-wing commentators eager to grow their male audiences and aspiring OnlyFans models hoping to grow subscriber bases through any form of online attention. The Venn diagram of their potential audiences is almost a circle, including even those spaces where pro-Trump commentators claim to want a return to more traditional values.

Take the short-form video content produced by manospheric dating podcasts like “Whatever” or “Fresh and Fit.” Those podcasts typically feature one or two conservatives, usually men, facing off around a gigantic semicircle table with numerous scantily clad women. The conservatives ask the women titillating, often rude questions, like how many men they’ve slept with. Firing Line this is not!

What kind of woman would subject themselves to that kind of treatment? Often, the answer is OnlyFans models looking to gain monetizable internet infamy, even from “trad” men. In a 2023 video, the hosts of the Miami-based Fresh and Fit—whose podcast has featured figures like Candace Owens and Milo Yiannopoulos in the designated conservative role—defended themselves from a viewer asking why they hosted so many OnlyFans models hoping to get rich off of their audiences.

“To get the most eyeballs. Unfortunately, sex sells,” host Amrou Fudl (aka Myron Gaines) said. “There is a method to the madness, and to get eyeballs on us, sometimes we have to bring in certain girls, whatever it may be.”

Fudl argued that their fight for traditional values was still being accomplished if they could draw in “simps and suckers” and direct even a fraction of them toward the less-sexualized media products they put out. Products like “Money Monday” and, I kid you not, “Womanizer Wednesday.”

The Los Angeles-based Whatever podcast runs on a similar model, featuring conservative commentators like the Daily Wire’s Michael Knowles facing off against OnlyFans models eager to promote their accounts. In 2024, YouTube commentator Daniel Keem described the podcast’s business model as “line up some only fans sluts to roast.”

Share


WHAT CANNON’S BEEN DOING seems to be working for her: She appears to have built a successful customer funnel for her OnlyFans by getting political. After posting conservative videos for just a few months, she now regularly gets tens of thousands of views on every short video on Instagram, as well as adoring comments and thousands of likes on each.

But not everyone on the right has been thrilled by her success.

“Conservative female talking heads are just a bunch of shallow, disgusting ****** spewing low-IQ takes,” complained far-right commentator Lauren Witzke on Tuesday, posting a video of Cannon’s legs-akimbo pose.
 
Last edited:

Torbee

Heisman
Sep 13, 2002
13,447
60,267
113
Crowder, displaying his usual respect for women, said Cannon’s pelvis-centric posing was merely a matter of degrees difference from female TPUSA influencer “ambassadors” or Fox News hosts.

“This is the sex appeal nuclear arms race,” Crowder said.

Cannon didn’t respond to a request for comment.


 
Last edited:

TJ8869

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2022
2,537
4,947
113
 

AFM22

Heisman
Oct 31, 2022
19,605
37,583
113
Makes sense. I have a coworker that is around 38 and single and she said when it comes to online dating if you can get someone to say "lets go on a date, meet here, at this time" and not be weird for an hour and a half on the first couple dates is a friggin unicorn.

Lot of guys out there that do not have it together and prob just easier to pay for some false sense of companionship than get their life together.
 

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
6,646
4,785
113
I can usually find the "logic" ... or the emotion ... that drives any and all decisions ... but the desire to pay money for what is entirely free on the web ... it's a strange situation, indeed. It's just so alien to me. I can find any and all perversions on the web, and not have to pay a dime to view them ... yet a huge contingent of folks feel compelled to pay for same. Presumably seeing it "live" (over video) is somehow worth the money? Or I guess sometimes you can talk to the "performers" and request things? That faked-up connection and interaction is somehow worth the money? I don't know ... I don't get it ... if I wanted to experience it live, I'd engage in it/watch it live for free, or, if desperate enough, pay to watch it live, in person. But I guess if folks are isolated, or their perversions are secretive to them, this is their outlet? I'd assume this would be a super niche low revenue situation, but I guess I underestimate the stupidity and desperation of many in society.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ktrain1969

RockyMtNole

Heisman
Jul 1, 2025
5,115
21,355
113
I can usually find the "logic" ... or the emotion ... that drives any and all decisions ... but the desire to pay money for what is entirely free on the web ... it's a strange situation, indeed. It's just so alien to me. I can find any and all perversions on the web, and not have to pay a dime to view them ... yet a huge contingent of folks feel compelled to pay for same. Presumably seeing it "live" (over video) is somehow worth the money? Or I guess sometimes you can talk to the "performers" and request things? That faked-up connection and interaction is somehow worth the money? I don't know ... I don't get it ... if I wanted to experience it live, I'd engage in it/watch it live for free, or, if desperate enough, pay to watch it live, in person. But I guess if folks are isolated, or their perversions are secretive to them, this is their outlet? I'd assume this would be a super niche low revenue situation, but I guess I underestimate the stupidity and desperation of many in society.
Same reason people drop big bucks at strip bars. “Sure, she’s taking advantage of all these other guys, but she loves me.”
 

r_desihawk

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
2,650
3,826
112
it would seem that this lady is successfully penetrating the consciousness of left leaners (like @Torbee) as well. i wont be surprised if a bunch of dems defect :)
 

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
6,646
4,785
113
Same reason people drop big bucks at strip bars. “Sure, she’s taking advantage of all these other guys, but she loves me.”

But that's an in-person experience. You can see ... uh, smell ... and, if you pay extra, touch (or be touched). There's actual interaction. I guess if you're weird/desperate enough, there's the thought that this physical person could do something more with me. But even the "need" for that has no doubt dwindled simply because you can view crap online for free and "get the poison out" that way.

Online, it's just virtual. And I'm assuming, it's not any meaningful interactions ... just commands, or quick comments ... but, yeah ... I won't know, because I just don't see any value in it at all.
 

RockyMtNole

Heisman
Jul 1, 2025
5,115
21,355
113
But that's an in-person experience. You can see ... uh, smell ... and, if you pay extra, touch (or be touched). There's actual interaction. I guess if you're weird/desperate enough, there's the thought that this physical person could do something more with me. But even the "need" for that has no doubt dwindled simply because you can view crap online for free and "get the poison out" that way.

Online, it's just virtual. And I'm assuming, it's not any meaningful interactions ... just commands, or quick comments ... but, yeah ... I won't know, because I just don't see any value in it at all.
I agree. It’s all about attention, though, you’re just paying for it.

And my guess is many of these guys prefer this video stuff vs in person. Either they’re married and don’t want a live encounter, or they’re incels who don’t know how to talk to women in person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsu1jreed
Tiger Illustrated

Latest

  1. 01 Tiger Illustrated Part 4: Tiger Illustrated's predictions for August camp in Clemson
  2. 02 Tiger Illustrated It's hard to go against Clemson getting its quarterback from Georgia
  3. 03 Tiger Illustrated Part 3: Tiger Illustrated's predictions for August camp in Clemson
  4. 04 On3 Clemson guard Dillon Hunter plans to enter transfer portal after NCAA injunction
  5. 05 Tiger Illustrated Clemson Football Roster & Recruiting Big Board: Quarterback