Which 2028 Presidential Candidate Would You Vote For?

Who are you voting for in 2028 out of this group?

  • JD Vance

  • Marco Rubio

  • Gavin Newsom

  • AOC


Results are only viewable after voting.

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,912
22,727
113
Getting an early gauge from the board. This place obviously swung hard left post-invasion, so I’m curious where things stand as of now.

These are the top 2 candidate from each party per Kalshi odds. Who are you voting for out of this group?
 

Ghee Buttersnaps 2

All-Conference
Nov 12, 2023
1,989
3,341
113
1785158250460.png

Disgusted Steve Carell GIF
 

firegiver

Heisman
Sep 10, 2007
74,024
21,059
113
Newsome is hard to vote for.
Gavin Newsom was humorously labeled as a likely "replicant" after failing a version of the Voight-Kampff test during a 2003 San Francisco mayoral election experiment. This test was designed to gauge emotional responses and empathy among candidates.

cinemagraph GIF


I'd vote for him over JD and Rubio though.
 

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,912
22,727
113
AOC aint running for president no matter what the 'betting markets' suggest. I think it’s pretty dumb to use 'betting markets' which can be flooded and manipulated.

Well, she’s off to an early lead in this poll. But the invaders have shown to skew into the hard left socialist dem camp, so not totally surprising.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: BelemNole

Torbee

Heisman
Sep 13, 2002
13,385
60,048
113
Bill Kristol with some good thoughts this morning:


You Don’t Have to Love ’Em to Vote for ’Em​

by William Kristol

To begin the week, just a brief thought on political parties.

In modern politics, you can’t really live without them. But it’s a pain to live with them.

We know that bold leaders don’t fit comfortably in them. Churchill switched parties (twice!), and then spent the 1930s fighting against the disastrous policies of the party he’d returned to. Reagan switched parties once, but then went so far as to challenge the sitting president of his adopted party for the nomination. The senators I’ve known the best and admired the most, Pat Moynihan and John McCain, were willing to take on their own parties.

Even we ordinary citizens have a difficult time with political parties. If you like to think for yourself, you chafe at party orthodoxy. If you like strong leadership, you chafe at party timidity.

This is all a way of saying that if you, dear reader, find today’s Democratic party annoying and frustrating and exasperating, there’s nothing wrong with you. Quite the contrary. You’re most likely a reasonable person.

And you’re not alone. A majority of Americans look set to choose the Democratic party over the Republicans this fall. But they share your doubts about the Democratic party, which clocks in at only about 38 percent approval.

Still, most Americans seem to realize that, whatever its problems, there’s only one party that stands ready to check a reckless administration that threatens our well-being and to oppose an authoritarian movement that threatens our freedoms. They accept the fact that what the 2026 election is about is whether Donald Trump will for the next two years have a Congress run by Republicans who will continue to bow to him and enable him, or one run by Democrats that will challenge and check him.

It’s frustrating to loyal Democrats that they’re not universally loved. But asking Americans who aren’t thrilled with either party suddenly, in the summer of 2026, to become huge fans of the Democrats, is asking too much. All Democrats have to do is to win their vote this November.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Feb 25, 2008
31,597
30,084
113
That's a pretty uninspiring slate.
So then who's forcing you to vote for them?.................

Fortunately you all still have time to manipulate the voting for better candidates.

If people honestly wanted to, in this country, you could have a man run as an Independent for President going by the name of Turd Ferguson, and to show what a f***ing farce our election process has become, garner enough people, as part of one massive troll job, to vote for him as President. And while he wouldn't be allowed to become President because our government wouldn't allow that regardless of how lopsided the voting would be, it would still send a significant message to our government that if you aren't going to give us serious candidates, then we aren't going to take your election seriously.....................


Food for thought. 🙂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scrubby

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,912
22,727
113
wheres Osseff?

BTW, Ossoff seems like a guy yall should get behind. AOC isn’t electable and is way too far left (and dumb). Kamala is a moron and not likable. Newsom has baggage from CA and probably can’t relate to middle America. Buttegiege (sp) has very few accomplishments to stand on and the gay thing will hurt him with blacks.

Ossoff seems more moderate. He hasn’t been around long enough to accumulate baggage. Seems to have some cachet.

I’d be most worried about him emerging from that group.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BelemNole

tigres88

All-American
Aug 7, 2022
2,965
7,812
113
BTW, Ossoff seems like a guy yall should get behind. AOC isn’t electable and is way too far left (and dumb). Kamala is a moron and not likable. Newsom has baggage from CA and probably can’t relate to middle America. Buttegiege (sp) has very few accomplishments to stand on and the gay thing will hurt him with blacks.

Ossoff seems more moderate. He hasn’t been around long enough to accumulate baggage. Seems to have some cachet.

I’d be most worried about him emerging from that group.
We are all very much on the Ossoff wagon. Dudes a stud
 

Torbee

Heisman
Sep 13, 2002
13,385
60,048
113
BTW, Ossoff seems like a guy yall should get behind. AOC isn’t electable and is way too far left (and dumb). Kamala is a moron and not likable. Newsom has baggage from CA and probably can’t relate to middle America. Buttegiege (sp) has very few accomplishments to stand on and the gay thing will hurt him with blacks.

Ossoff seems more moderate. He hasn’t been around long enough to accumulate baggage. Seems to have some cachet.

I’d be most worried about him emerging from that group.
Calling AOC dumb discredits the rest of your argument. You may disagree with her, you may reject her politics, but she is not a dumb person.
 

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
25,885
24,823
113
Calling AOC dumb discredits the rest of your argument. You may disagree with her, you may reject her politics, but she is not a dumb person.
She is smart in a social kind of way. But I don't think she is intellectually smart at all. Like if she is in charge of making decisions with real consequence, she is the last person i would want to make the decision. She can't reason her way out of a wet paper bag.
 

baltimorened

All-American
May 29, 2001
7,411
5,507
113
Compared to what we have now and the other selections it’s a no-brainer…Ossoff is the man.
I don't know much about Ossoff. What are his positions on things like immigration, Ice, national Security, taxes, billionaires, education etc.. He has a Senate record now, so we should get a good indication.

I know he'll get at least one vote Dpic73, is a big fan
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
33,024
28,564
113
I don't like these choices but if I had to pick, I'd vote for Newsom. He's got baggage for sure but he's a fighter, smart and will hold them accountable for the obscene level of corruption we've seen in Trump's second term. That's why it has to be a Democrat or these people will have gotten away with murder.

But I don't expect these to be the top two in the end and especially if we hold our first primary in South Carolina. If Ossoff can be persuaded to jump in, I think he'd get a huge bump there due to his credibility with the black community.