New rules for SEC football in 2026

BlueVelvetFog

Heisman
Apr 12, 2016
14,448
19,999
78
Honestly true and proven targeting --they should keep the 2nd/1st format. With what we know now especially (brain and such)
 

CrimsonCats_rivals

All-Conference
Mar 22, 2022
1,738
3,539
61
Appears to be SEC only. Seems odd that a conference rule could be counter to NCAA rules.
The SEC has been making a lot of noise about breaking away from the NCAA entirely over the past few days, so this seems like a small but tangible step in that direction. I feel like we’re about to be in for a turbulent time in the sport, even more so that what the portal has already created.
 
  • Like
Reactions: catagious

CB3UK

Hall of Famer
Apr 15, 2012
64,468
107,638
78
I feel like I'm good with both on their face....open to being convinced why they're bad.

Too many of these targeting calls have been made expecting the defender to defy the laws of physics.

If we see someone rise to the level of flagrant, obvious, undebiable head hunting then of course go ahead and escalate penalties to future suspensions. The league, the school, the coach.....they all have the power to do that.
 

robman181

All-Conference
May 1, 2004
1,100
1,553
113
There needs to be 2 versions of targeting. Illegal hit which is 5 yards and automatic first down with no player penalty and then targeting as it exists today. If it's not a dirty hit, the penalty is too severe but they still need to make sure they're protecting guys.