Is the SEC really going to break away ....

Dawgzilla2

All-Conference
Oct 9, 2022
2,274
2,648
113
I think Sankey is floating that talk to heat up the discussions on the Protect College Sports Act. The SEC and BIG want more protections from potential liability so the conferences and NCAA can know their rules won't just result in more litigation.
 

CochiseCowbell

Heisman
Oct 29, 2012
15,250
13,466
113
freddie mercury queen GIF
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstateglfr

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
59,180
29,623
113
Not without the Big 10, and probably the ACC & Big 12 too, no. This is all posturing and sabre rattling. Ultimately, the Big 4 (or maybe just the Big 2) conferences will form a new football-only division within the NCAA.
 

OG Goat Holder

Heisman
Sep 30, 2022
13,469
12,397
113
Not without the Big 10, and probably the ACC & Big 12 too, no. This is all posturing and sabre rattling. Ultimately, the Big 4 (or maybe just the Big 2) conferences will form a new football-only division within the NCAA.
I keep thinking that's the easy answer, the ones willing to pay rev share and the ones who aren't. But then you have to remember that rev share isn't mandatory........you are simply ALLOWED to do it if you want......therefore, the legislation didn't mandate this. This was done because of the stupid commissioners. The case only mandated that the future NCAA earnings pay back those 2016-2021 athletes, this rev share BS was added to help quell some of the booster-paying and create competitive balance. All it really did was saddle athletic departments with a 20M bill. So honestly, I think we may not see a true breakaway, rather we might see some schools move divisions or something because they are tired of getting their butt kicked maybe.

I think Sankey is just a bad commissioner, and he knows he's losing power.
 

Boosh

Junior
Sep 14, 2017
248
287
63
I keep thinking that's the easy answer, the ones willing to pay rev share and the ones who aren't. But then you have to remember that rev share isn't mandatory........you are simply ALLOWED to do it if you want......therefore, the legislation didn't mandate this. This was done because of the stupid commissioners. The case only mandated that the future NCAA earnings pay back those 2016-2021 athletes, this rev share BS was added to help quell some of the booster-paying and create competitive balance. All it really did was saddle athletic departments with a 20M bill. So honestly, I think we may not see a true breakaway, rather we might see some schools move divisions or something because they are tired of getting their butt kicked maybe.

I think Sankey is just a bad commissioner, and he knows he's losing power.
Sankey is losing relevancy. The B10 is kicking his a$$.
 

TheBannerM

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2024
1,372
1,954
113
from the NCAA?
No. Will the SEC and the Big Ten break away when their ROG runs out (2034 or so), bringing a select few ACC teams? Probably.

You could go to 40 teams (SEC + B1G +ND and 5 ACC teams - Miami/FSU/UVa/NC/???). Four divisions of 10 schools, making a playoff easy to set up. Kick out the dead weight (Us, Purdue, etc.) and you could bring in the top left overs. However, I don't think it's a slam dunk that we get left out. The Blue Bloods are going to want to keep the bottom tier Big 2 conference schools around for wins.
 
Aug 22, 2012
1,099
349
83
The answer is yes, and this is what I have been preaching for many years. The SEC and Big 10 will break away soon and poach the upper echelon teams from the other 2 conferences. At that point all founding member ties will fly out of the window- See Oregon State (who has a great baseball program BTW) and Washington State. We have to improve at football and have to do it this season. If we don't I hope all the baseball fanatics can wrap your heads around weekend home series against our new rivals of South Alabama and Southern Miss.