2026 SS Gestapo ICE
- Thread starter RoseBowlorBust
- Start date
- which is why I laid out the actual solution above. Every time I speak to someone about this issue, I tell them the solution and have yet to have anyone tell me it wouldn't work. The problem is no one, and I mean NO ONE wants to actually fix it. Rs have the house, senate, exec, and SCOTUS right now. All we can muster is EOs that will be reversed the first month of the next D admin (if that is allowed to ever happen) and throwing hundreds of billion$ at the problem.
If the dog catches the car, they can't run on fear and BS. So, theater it is!
Yeah, it’s amazing some people actually believe US law and the Constitution should be suspended if the dead suspect proves to be unlikable. The only justification for law enforcement killing a suspect is because of imminent danger to themselves or others. If that is the case here, and any reasonable person would conclude a credible, imminent danger did indeed exist, then the killing of said suspect is justified. If a reasonable person would not conclude any real danger existed, then it is not justified.
I haven’t looked into this particular case, but this sh*t is not hard. Or at least it shouldn’t be. The problem, as usual, is all of this sh*t is filtered through the lens of tribalism. In Minnesota, for example, in the cases of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, one shooting could be considered justified by most reasonable people to the extent of granting a little latitude to LEs, who are always at a high-level of risk (and I agree with granting a little latitude). So, IMO, while ICE f#cked up by aggressively charging at her vehicle, Renee Good put herself at risk by fleeing in a panic. Because I believe she was most likely panicking and not trying to harm anyone, the incident was extremely tragic and unfortunate. However, a reasonable case could be made for self-defense despite the errors in judgment by the involved ICE agents.
That, however, was not the case in the Alex Pretti shooting. The video evidence was clear. Pretti was facedown with his hands behind his back being restrained by several ICE agents. It was only after an agent removed a firearm from Pretti’s person (which Pretti was legally carrying) that ICE decided to Swiss cheese him. That was murder.
Of course, everyone saw both of these shootings through the lens of Team MAGA or Team Blue colored glasses. Hence, same sh*t, different incident.
I was simply pointing out they his first sentence said "we have employed brown people for quite a while" and followed it up with "E-Verify!". That is contradictory in my book.
As to why states don't use it, I have no idea. Not something I know or care about personally. I assume it is difficult in a place like CA or WA where there is a ton of immigration for school, work, etc and a system complicates things because nuance. If E-Verify treats visa worker coming from China working for Amazon the same as an illegal from MX that wants to pick apples and send cash back home, you are looking at exceptions upon exceptions to process. AI likely helps that moving forward?
Placed on probation for a period of one year and suspension of business license.
They knew he was trying to run them over with his car when they shot him. The fact that the illegal alien/would be murderer is also a drug dealer just proves how you retards will defend anything/anyone because you are in a cult.
You are a true dunce. I'm not even trolling, rags. You're an actual idiot.
Be honest for once. You don't even know what was in that garbage legislation, do you?
The fact that you don't believe in due process for anyone on American soil and you revel in the death of a human being shows me how UnAmerican and morally bankrupt you are.
Last edited:
"You gave to let them murder officers to give them justice"
No, actually you don't. Attempting to kill a law enforcement officer is a sure fire (pun intended) way to get yourself killed. The shooting was entirely justified and you are simping for a criminal. You're a bad person.
Word has just come out that they may not be drugs at all, so it appears they jumped the gun to create a narrative before any analysis has been done.
From your mouth to the Flying Spaghetti Monster’s ears.
The f#ck you aren’t.
Was this ever debated?
Let me know when you start then I will consider it.
In summary, an expedited pathway to citizenship for passably f#ckable or hotter brown teens 16 or under willing to work in a secret trap house near Mar-a-Lago and receive anal sex and a golden shower from Donald Trump whenever called upon. For un-f#ckable women, half would be sent to work in Trump’s luxurious hotels for $50 dollars a day; the other half would be sent to sanctuary cities and summarily registered to vote as Democrats. For the men, any with known affiliated gang tattoos would be injected with a lethal dose of fentanyl. For the rest of the men, a quarter would be employed as pool/cabana boys at homes of those Republican MAGAs who had lonely housewives willing to keep quiet about their husbands’ Grindr accounts. Another quarter would join those women sent to sanctuary cities and also be registered as Democrats. The remaining half would be trained to become ICE agents.
The deal seemed pretty fair and bipartisan to me, but I guess ultimately Donald Trump was feeling the pinch from having his tit in a legal wringer and decided doing all he could to ensure a victory in November was more important than having a plethora of underage Mexican cuties to sexually assault, so ultimately he had no choice but to deliver no-go marching orders to the MAGA Idiot Brigade.
Okay, so I nailed it. What do I win?
How about not? Take out the minimal number of violent criminals. Leave people here going through the system legally alone. Stop breaking up families.
I am not simping for a "criminal". I am advocating for the actual rule of law.
I have yet to see a single compelling video to show that this was a clean kill.
What TF does that even mean? Did Biden have the wall taken down? Gates opened wide. Damn, you guys are easy marks.
You can be for immigration enforcement but not by any means necessary and especially not with violence.
"The rule of law" should have thrown him out of the country decades ago. He broke those laws and them decided to deal meth on top of that before weaponizing his car. Clean kill of a lifetime criminal (who you are simping for)
Yeah, it’s a little hyperbolic.
Like when Trump chumps accuse me of being a Communist phaggot libtard or unhinged leftist lunatics like @PW Herman refer to me as a neo-Nazi pimpin’, fascist-loving MAGA.
In the words of Joe Walsh: “…Everybody’s so different; I haven’t changed.”
How many illegal aliens did it allow to cross the US border per day? Number only, please. You seemed to have left that important detail out for some weird reason.
without any enforcement? none.
it provided additional powers for completely shutting down the border during surge-type events
but this notion that it was a complete free-for-all before those border shut-down powers kicked in is entirely an invention of the legislation's opponents. a complete falsehood.
I am not aware of anytime. I will say that during the Great Recession it was an even hotter topic around these parts than it is now. All large construction jobs were absolutely doing e-verify.
Why just violent criminals? They are all criminals and what percentage aregoing through the system legally? They wouldn’t be illegal if they were legally going through the system.
It definitely has. Now is there a black market for fake documents to pass the e verify. I am sure there is.
Curious why you think they are all "criminals" for a civil offense? Civil and criminal are completely different, you understand that, right?
It’s just the definition of the word.
Someone who has committed a crime, which is an illegal act punished by the government.
You understand that right? They know what they are doing is illegal and they don’t care. Why should we allow that?
They know, they just pretend to not understand how things work to make discourse impossible