Why is he a bad guy?Greg is awful game day coach and a bad guy. Not someone you want representing our school. Move on
Why is he a bad guy?Greg is awful game day coach and a bad guy. Not someone you want representing our school. Move on
Why is he a bad guy?
Drayton already got the boot after 2024. KC Keeler's the Temple HC now, and based on his track record I expect him to build a winner there.Active coaches with worst performance since Greg started in 2.0
1. Stan Drayton (Temple Owls) — WORST
- 6-Year Record: 9–27 (Tenure began in 2022)
- Winning Percentage: 25.0%
Temple is a tough place to win, but that's why coaches are hired-to win games, and win championships in their conferences. Matt Rhule and Al Golden secured first place finishes for Temple in their divisions, but they both found out that doing the same in certain P4 conferences and situations is much harder. Golden got the boot at Miami. Rhule did well at Baylor, but he has not yet been able to do well at Nebraska. For that matter, Bielema did well at Wisconsin, not well at Arkansas, but he has done quite well at Illinois.Drayton already got the boot after 2024. KC Keeler's the Temple HC now, and based on his track record I expect him to build a winner there.
I love when the likes of RU Division make a statement about Schiano being a bad guy for no apparent reason!Calling him a “bad guy” is just silly. He clearly cares about his players and their families and Rutgers. He’s put his heart and soul into everything he’s done at RU - there’s nobody who would describe him as “lazy” that’s for sure. But he’s made costly mistakes that have prevented him from taking the critical next step he would’ve needed to make to have forward looking job security - this off season he did finally take the step most of us felt all among he’d need to do to have a chance at success - he finally stepped “out of the way” on both offense and defense. But is it too little too late? We’ll find out soon enough.
This exposes a difference- a few posters have lashed out at posters for discussing Greg's record. The posters discussing the W-L record are not haters, they just want the team to do better, even if that means changing coaches. Many of these same posters have also said they love how Greg runs a clean program, takes care of his players, teaches about life after football, and is a great ambassador for Rutgers.I love when the likes of RU Division make a statement about Schiano being a bad guy for no apparent reason!
Wow, now he’s a bad guy. The guys who have played for him don’t think so.Greg is awful game day coach and a bad guy. Not someone you want representing our school. Move on
The "bad guy" comments is difficult for me...in his own words - he was a "bad guy" to my son and wished to apologize after he came back. Bad human- not at all- he does many wonderful things. He does create an environment for good kids to get a base on life and feel safe. But there are many that would agree to my last statement who played for guy and who would also say that he is just "a bad guy" Others that played for him that love him.Calling him a “bad guy” is just silly. He clearly cares about his players and their families and Rutgers. He’s put his heart and soul into everything he’s done at RU - there’s nobody who would describe him as “lazy” that’s for sure. But he’s made costly mistakes that have prevented him from taking the critical next step he would’ve needed to make to have forward looking job security - this off season he did finally take the step most of us felt all among he’d need to do to have a chance at success - he finally stepped “out of the way” on both offense and defense. But is it too little too late? We’ll find out soon enough.
I love when the likes of RU Division make a statement about Schiano being a bad guy for no apparent reason!
That certainly may be the case, I don’t have that kind of inside info for sure. I’d imagine what you describe is the case with any coach, teacher or similar. Some kids love them while other do not mesh well. That doesn’t make him a straight out “bad guy” though. His style might’ve put some kids off through the years. No doubt. That doesn’t mean he intended to hurt anyone along the way.The "bad guy" comments is difficult for me...in his own words - he was a "bad guy" to my son and wished to apologize after he came back. Bad human- not at all- he does many wonderful things. He does create an environment for good kids to get a base on life and feel safe. But there are many that would agree to my last statement who played for guy and who would also say that he is just "a bad guy" Others that played for him that love him.
Usually- these broke into two categories- players that love him to no fault- they were players, good or bad, that never challenged him.
The players that really do not respect him- are the players that did challenge him.
GS 1.0 - often would just run onto a practice field completely unhinged at a player- try to embarrass them but, never even tell them what they may have done wrong. He did many good things but he really wasn't always just tough to teach, he would be tough for his own ego.
As for what he is to Rutgers as a HC- he has done what maybe, no one else could have. He got us interested and fought against everyone that blindly just wanted Rutgers football gone- twice.
Perfect hire for 1.0 and 2.0
He can also bring the team to "respect"
But he just can't get over the hump.
The man most likely deserves an honor here at Rutgers for what he has done- but he also, should not be the HC any longer.
I believe the 2015-16 are distorted by the Big Ten Build fundraising drive.Yes I am.
Below is donation info going back to the 2013 season. These is what is available through rutgers.edu.
Schiano brings in more donations than Ash, but less than Flood. Another objective measure of fan support is ticket sales revenue. Likewise, Schiano is better than Ash but worse than Flood. Greg isn't the windfall some imagine him to be.
Keli stated on a TKR pod that "competitive success" is what she prioritizes, with Keli adding she looks at "the past five years of our programs."
Donations make up a tiny part of the Rutgers football program's budget. I'm sure big Rutgers football donors seek to influence head coach decisions. Their generosity earns them some access. Ultimately, the decision to keep or replace Greg should be made by Keli, Tate, and the Board of Governors.
If Greg is replaced and it makes a donor so upset the donor pulls support, so be it. The Rutgers football program and athletics department will survive - and maybe thrive for a change. Whatever Rutgers football loses in donations can be more than made up simply by installing a new coach with a Big Ten average support staff. In addition, the fanbase has soured on Greg. Bringing in a new coach with a fresh approach should fire up the fans. Getting donations and ticket sales revenue back to the Flood level would bring in millions more per year.
View attachment 1330224
I can tell you this, he's not very well thought of throughout the athletic dept. From other coaches to support staff people, you won't find a lot of people with nice things to say about him. What he likes to portray to outside world is very different than what goes on when the camera isn't rolling. It wouldn't be an issue if he won at an acceptable level. But when you don't? He's very lucky Hobbs gave him that golden parachute contract that's for sure.That certainly may be the case, I don’t have that kind of inside info for sure. I’d imagine what you describe is the case with any coach, teacher or similar. Some kids love them while other do not mesh well. That doesn’t make him a straight out “bad guy” though. His style might’ve put some kids off through the years. No doubt. That doesn’t mean he intended to hurt anyone along the way.
I've never even met GS, much less know him personally, but from what I've seen publicly I tend to agree. One reason I really wanted the GS 2.0 era to succeed was because early on after he got re-hired, it seemed like he really *had* changed at least somewhat over the years.This exposes a difference- a few posters have lashed out at posters for discussing Greg's record. The posters discussing the W-L record are not haters, they just want the team to do better, even if that means changing coaches. Many of these same posters have also said they love how Greg runs a clean program, takes care of his players, teaches about life after football, and is a great ambassador for Rutgers.
The post you flagged, on the other hand, seems to be a person who has an axes to grind. Greg Schiano is the furthest thing from a "bad guy." He's a good guy. And we want to see good guys win for the team and for the fans and alumni!!!
He was a disaster, he coasted on Greg’s players.I think Flood gets a raw deal from fans.
That said - it’s apples and oranges. Flood inherited a program coming off a 9-4 season including a convincing bowl win over Iowa State. Not to mention a best ever incoming recruiting class on the way.
He was only head coach 4 years and went 4-8 in his final year. His first year was the only season he matched the 9 wins of his predecessor and WVU was removed from the schedule. The following year he won only 6 games with a MUCH easier schedule AAC schedule than Greg ever had. His best result by far was the first year in the BIG and he deserves more credit for that than he gets from most but he still only won 8 games (including the bowl win and we also played one less conference game then).
But was a better game day coach, had far fewer resources and was constantly on the watch for Julie to fire him.He was a disaster, he coasted on Greg’s players.
That last paragraph is outstanding. Very well-written of where the program is at, and I agree 100%.I've never even met GS, much less know him personally, but from what I've seen publicly I tend to agree. One reason I really wanted the GS 2.0 era to succeed was because early on after he got re-hired, it seemed like he really *had* changed at least somewhat over the years.
Not that he was a bad guy before, but as I remember it, back in early 1.0 GS would constantly just trash the state the program was in before he got there, how pathetic everything and everyone was, whereas this time he (again, at least publicly) adopted a much more positive attitude, even though the program he was inheriting was clearly once again a disaster on the field. He was way more upbeat early on this time - if not about the level of talent, then at least about the players and people in the program. Who actually knows, but I always wondered if that positive energy played a role in the 2020 team being more competitive than expected, even if the main reason for that was probably just that it was the extremely weird COVID year.
As for now, it's wait and see. On the surface he has what he needs: leadership alignment, investment in NIL, revamped defensive staff. I just worry that the stars will never exactly align the way they need to for him to break through - and maybe more importantly, that the whole problem is the stars need to be perfectly aligned for the breakthrough to happen to begin with. In '23 we had the defense but not the offense, in '24 it was the reverse (with a ton of injuries not helping). In '25 we had the offense and a great defensive portal haul on paper, but not the defensive staff we needed. Now we might have that staff, but the portal haul was underwhelming and the offense has some questions with a new QB. GS has done a lot of good for the program, but an elite coach shouldn't need everything to break just right to, say, finish nationally ranked once in a while. We shall see.
A
You couldn't be more wrong. He has a .478 win % that DOES NOT make him the "winningest" coach in Rutgers history. Plain and simple. You're insulting and disrespecting the following former HC's by saying as much:
Frank Burns .643
George Sanford .629
Harvey Harmon .625
...and a SLEW OF HC'S OVER .500. Guess who isn't over .500% lifetime? GREG SCHIANO. Again: .478%.
All you have to do - ALL YOU HAVE TO DO - is say "nobody has every WON MORE games - or LOST MORE GAMES - than Greg Schiano!
(relax guy, just providing facts...regardless of WHAT/WHY/HOW Greg or any other coach got there....thanks)

nail meets headI can tell you this, he's not very well thought of throughout the athletic dept. From other coaches to support staff people, you won't find a lot of people with nice things to say about him. What he likes to portray to outside world is very different than what goes on when the camera isn't rolling. It wouldn't be an issue if he won at an acceptable level. But when you don't? He's very lucky Hobbs gave him that golden parachute contract that's for sure.
the school failed Flood, not Flood failing the schoolHe was a disaster, he coasted on Greg’s players.
He wasn’t as bad as some people make it out to be, but it’s hard to imagine his recruiting classes wouldn’t have caught up with him.the school failed Flood, not Flood failing the school
All of his (counting) Crows would have eventually come home to roost.He wasn’t as bad as some people make it out to be, but it’s hard to imagine his recruiting classes wouldn’t have caught up with him.
The Big Ten Build was credited to Ash and Pike.I believe the 2015-16 are distorted by the Big Ten Build fundraising drive.
Not sure what you are saying is consistent when you say the money came from taxpayers, not donors.The Big Ten Build was credited to Ash and Pike.
"Chris Ash and Steve Pikiell gifts push campaign to $100M as the build continues."
The fact is the money came from taxpayers, not donors.
"Launched on Jan. 20, 2016, the campaign was kick-started by $25 million in tax credits under an Economic Redevelopment and Growth Grant co-sponsored by Senators Raymond Lesniak and Tom Kean, Jr., supported by Senator Stephen Sweeney and Assemblyman Vincent Prieto, and signed by Governor Chris Christie."
Thank you for your donations.Not sure what you are saying is consistent when you say the money came from taxpayers, not donors.
The linked article in your post says: "The largest gift in Rutgers Athletics history - $15 million – was made toward R Big Ten Build to enable construction of The Gary and Barbara Rodkin Academic Success Center by the namesake benefactors."
"The contribution followed record-setting major gifts to support Rutgers' approximately 650 student-athletes from Rutgers Board of Governors member and Motorola Solutions CEO Greg Brown and his wife Anna, noted real estate developer Steven Plofker and makeup mogul Bobbi Brown, and business leaders and philanthropists Jeff and Amy Towers."
"The Fred Hill Baseball and Softball Training Complex, The Ron and Joanna Garutti Strength and Conditioning Center, The Abe Suydam Men's Basketball Locker room, and The Harriett and Bob Druskin Strength and Conditioning Center have also risen through the generosity of donors via the R Big Ten Build campaign. "
"The RWJBarnabas Health Athletic Performance Center at Rutgers University will welcome occupants this summer, with a grand opening slated for September. "
There is a plaque in the lobby of the RWJ Barnabas Health Athletic Performance Center Listing significant donors beyond the donors mentioned above. You should see it sometime.
Here is a list of the donors- You will find the names of Mr. and Mrs. Shift on the list:
Please show your work for your conclusion.Thank you for your donations.
The RWJ Barnabas Health Athletics Performance Center was mostly funded by debt incurred by Rutgers and tax credits given by the state.
The academic success center too. Donors helped to fund, and their generosity is awesome, and mostly built using university borrowing and state tax credits.
Read about his time in Tampa! How he treated everyone from the players to the people who worked in the dinning hall!Why is he a bad guy?
Educate your self ! Read about all his stops and why he was consistently fired. Understand why NO ONE would hire him but us in his second go around.Calling him a “bad guy” is just silly. He clearly cares about his players and their families and Rutgers. He’s put his heart and soul into everything he’s done at RU - there’s nobody who would describe him as “lazy” that’s for sure. But he’s made costly mistakes that have prevented him from taking the critical next step he would’ve needed to make to have forward looking job security - this off season he did finally take the step most of us felt all among he’d need to do to have a chance at success - he finally stepped “out of the way” on both offense and defense. But is it too little too late? We’ll find out soon enough.
I responded why! You’re just too lazy or have your head buried in the sand.to educate yourself. Spend the time to understand wjat happened in Tampa, OSU, and yes PSU. Take the time to understand Tennessee fired him before he even started. Why did NO ONE want to hire him when RU caved to his demands in his second stop. Understand the constant scape goating.I love when the likes of RU Division make a statement about Schiano being a bad guy for no apparent reason!
More than happy to simply discuss W/L and on field coaching which is Awful btw. Bottom 5 in the county.This exposes a difference- a few posters have lashed out at posters for discussing Greg's record. The posters discussing the W-L record are not haters, they just want the team to do better, even if that means changing coaches. Many of these same posters have also said they love how Greg runs a clean program, takes care of his players, teaches about life after football, and is a great ambassador for Rutgers.
The post you flagged, on the other hand, seems to be a person who has an axe to grind. Greg Schiano is the furthest thing from a "bad guy." He's a good guy. And we want to see good guys win for the team and for the fans and alumni!!!
You have someone with first hand knowledge telling you he was a bad guy. Telling you that he himself was admitting to his bad behavior. You’re getting an account that a lot of players and staff felt the same. Yet you seem to down play and ignore because it does not fit your narrative.That certainly may be the case, I don’t have that kind of inside info for sure. I’d imagine what you describe is the case with any coach, teacher or similar. Some kids love them while other do not mesh well. That doesn’t make him a straight out “bad guy” though. His style might’ve put some kids off through the years. No doubt. That doesn’t mean he intended to hurt anyone along the way.
Could of nominated Cignetti if Hobbs didn’t give Greggy the most undeserved contract extension of all time.I nominate
View attachment 1360650
Paywall’d, but given he’s come up a few times in the thread thought it was worth posting for the headline alone
Paywall’d, but given he’s come up a few times in the thread thought it was worth posting for the headline alone

Paywall’d, but given he’s come up a few times in the thread thought it was worth posting for the headline alone
Maybe because winning in football is more than just the coach. Maybe it's a combination of coaching, the AD, the schedule, the strength of the conference at the time and luck. A quick look at Belema's time at Ark. he looks like he has the team on an upswing entering the 2016 season, but then goes 7-6 and 3-5 in the conference but he plays 6 ranked teams. At that point maybe the big donors start to get grumbly. Then looking at his schedules at Illinois they seem much easier and maybe in a game or two he get's lucky and the opposing coach gifts him a win or two. Great coaches can overcome a lot. But maybe some good coaches just get lucky sometimes and sometimes not.Temple is a tough place to win, but that's why coaches are hired-to win games, and win championships in their conferences. Matt Rhule and Al Golden secured first place finishes for Temple in their divisions, but they both found out that doing the same in certain P4 conferences and situations is much harder. Golden got the boot at Miami. Rhule did well at Baylor, but he has not yet been able to do well at Nebraska. For that matter, Bielema did well at Wisconsin, not well at Arkansas, but he has done quite well at Illinois.
And on that score, given his track record at Cincinnati, Fickell has been a disaster at Wisconsin. Sometimes the coach does not fit the location, culture, and/or dynamics of a program regardless of his success at other teams and/or levels. We know this-it is difficult to win in the B1G- would be an interesting study of what caused Bielema to do poorly at Arkansas, but to do well at Illinois.
He did good at Wisky and seems to be doing well at Illinois.Maybe because winning in football is more than just the coach. Maybe it's a combination of coaching, the AD, the schedule, the strength of the conference at the time and luck. A quick look at Belema's time at Ark. he looks like he has the team on an upswing entering the 2016 season, but then goes 7-6 and 3-5 in the conference but he plays 6 ranked teams. At that point maybe the big donors start to get grumbly. Then looking at his schedules at Illinois they seem much easier and maybe in a game or two he get's lucky and the opposing coach gifts him a win or two. Great coaches can overcome a lot. But maybe some good coaches just get lucky sometimes and sometimes not.