Kerr Kriisa arrested by FBI

Nightwish

Senior
Jul 10, 2025
569
823
93
He sounds like a sociopath but that's just my uneducated opinion from the allegations. If you create a made-up world in which you're lying and hurting others, getting rich doing so, and you're trying to gain sympathy and more rewards for yourself by lying about your own mother and telling someone she has a serious illness, that's beyond anything I thought of when I heard about the arrest. There's a lack of empathy there that unfortunately some in life just have or develop.
 

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
46,753
85,427
113
He sounds like a sociopath but that's just my uneducated opinion from the allegations. If you create a made-up world in which you're lying and hurting others, getting rich doing so, and you're trying to gain sympathy and more rewards for yourself by lying about your own mother and telling someone she has a serious illness, that's beyond anything I thought of when I heard about the arrest. There's a lack of empathy there that unfortunately some in life just have or develop.
Yup pretty awful stuff. Honestly sounds like something an addict would concoct. I’ve seen some ridiculous stuff in my day to get money.
 

Starrcade

Junior
Jun 4, 2026
189
258
63
He sounds like a sociopath but that's just my uneducated opinion from the allegations. If you create a made-up world in which you're lying and hurting others, getting rich doing so, and you're trying to gain sympathy and more rewards for yourself by lying about your own mother and telling someone she has a serious illness, that's beyond anything I thought of when I heard about the arrest. There's a lack of empathy there that unfortunately some in life just have or develop.

It's a crazy world. Some don't even have empathy for opinions that differ from there's on message forums and try to get them taken down like a brat.
 

champagnecat

All-Conference
Nov 28, 2025
368
1,068
93
Why in the world did the person getting scammed wait so long to report him? He should’ve never been at UK or anywhere else. Unless he believed the story that long?
 

Smeegs

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2025
997
2,873
93
Why in the world did the person getting scammed wait so long to report him? He should’ve never been at UK or anywhere else. Unless he believed the story that long?
It wasn’t just one person, there are multiple victims named in the indictment.

As for why he wasn’t reported sooner, who knows? People can be amazingly gullible when dealing with a smooth talking scam artist …even really rich ones. Especially when the scam artist comes with an aura of credibility as a somewhat famous athlete.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CrimsonCats_rivals

FilsonCat

All-Conference
Apr 5, 2007
3,507
4,294
113
Why in the world did the person getting scammed wait so long to report him? He should’ve never been at UK or anywhere else. Unless he believed the story that long?
He invented at least one fake persona to help keep the scam going. The allegations in the indictment probably are not all of it, and there's going to be more if he does a plea agreement. He's going to have to spill all of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: *Fox2Monk*

UKnine

All-Conference
Mar 25, 2023
636
1,496
93
Huh? If you plea you are committing to time, fine, and often forfeiture. And, admitting to the elements of the crime to which you plea. That admission will be under oath before a Court that must accept your plea. Federal prosecutions rarely (I mean rarely) plea out with someone not going to jail.

You are totally wrong. When they come after people a lot of times there case is not as air tight as most people think. They accept pleas all the time with the writing saying the defendant saying it is not a plea of guilt and the government specifying that there is no admission of guilt. The defendant will agree to a payment but it ends up being way less than a drawn out trial would cost.

Tons of people who truly believe they are innocent take these pleas to save time, money, stress and worry. Even if innocent, instead of fighting for hundreds of thousands of dollars and risking a jury conviction, it’s easier to agree to pay a lesser amount and keep your record clean. The feds agree to this when their case is not very good.
 

MychalG

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2012
2,952
2,846
82
Doesn't sound like he is playing with a full deck.."Former UK player." That is always included.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
42,640
64,936
113
You are totally wrong. When they come after people a lot of times there case is not as air tight as most people think. They accept pleas all the time with the writing saying the defendant saying it is not a plea of guilt and the government specifying that there is no admission of guilt. The defendant will agree to a payment but it ends up being way less than a drawn out trial would cost.

Tons of people who truly believe they are innocent take these pleas to save time, money, stress and worry. Even if innocent, instead of fighting for hundreds of thousands of dollars and risking a jury conviction, it’s easier to agree to pay a lesser amount and keep your record clean. The feds agree to this when their case is not very good.
You don’t know what you are talking about. The Feds only indict cases they want to indict. Unlike state and local prosecutions that need to take any case where there is an arrest. Most federal criminal prosecutions originate with an indictment. AUSAs can reject any case they don’t like. So, they indict good cases, not the crap you suggest.

Explain your interactions any United States Attorney’s Office. I am interested in why you are so wrong.
 
Jun 10, 2026
150
238
43
You don’t know what you are talking about. The Feds only indict cases they want to indict. Unlike state and local prosecutions that need to take any case where there is an arrest. Most federal criminal prosecutions originate with an indictment. AUSAs can reject any case they don’t like. So, they indict good cases, not the crap you suggest.

Explain your interactions any United States Attorney’s Office. I am interested in why you are so wrong.
He sounds like my first public defender before I understood anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beatle Bum

UKnine

All-Conference
Mar 25, 2023
636
1,496
93
You don’t know what you are talking about. The Feds only indict cases they want to indict. Unlike state and local prosecutions that need to take any case where there is an arrest. Most federal criminal prosecutions originate with an indictment. AUSAs can reject any case they don’t like. So, they indict good cases, not the crap you suggest.

Explain your interactions any United States Attorney’s Office. I am interested in why you are so wrong.

OK dumbass!
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
42,640
64,936
113
The feds have a high conviction rate, but it is really not as impressive as the numbers sound.

The majority of the time the defendant will do some kind of plea, not admitting to guilt and pay a fine. Most of the time it is way way cheaper to pay a fine than to fight the feds who have unlimited money. The college basketball recruiting scandal involved tons of people and only a handful got locked up. They count that as 100 percent in their stats.
This is the stupid claim you made. Not that cases plea, but that people who plea don’t go to jail and don’t admit guilt. You are a fool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FactsOrOpinions

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
42,640
64,936
113
“According to United States Sentencing Commission data, over 75% of convicted federal defendants receive a term of incarceration. With more than 90% of federal cases concluding in guilty pleas and overall conviction rates exceeding 95%, the remaining sentences consist of probation, fines, or time served.” Google AI
 

FilsonCat

All-Conference
Apr 5, 2007
3,507
4,294
113
Federal defendants take plea deals because 1. their resources to fight may be not be close to what it will take to defend a complex case through the trial phase, and 2. they are looking at dozens of years or longer without the possibility of parole, and a deal gets offered because they are a small fish and the case doesn't really have legs. It costs a small fortune to defend white collar criminal cases through trial.

In Miami or Ft Lauderdale, Kriisa may not have even been charged, because there are just too many other big fish out there to prosecute. In West Virginia, a case in the 2M range gets attention.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FactsOrOpinions
Jun 10, 2026
150
238
43
Federal defendants take plea deals because 1. their resources to fight may be not be close to what it will take to defend a complex case through the trial phase, and 2. they are looking at dozens of years or longer without the possibility of parole, and a deal gets offered because they are a small fish and the case doesn't really have legs. It costs a small fortune to defend white collar criminal cases through trial.

In Miami or Ft Lauderdale, Kriisa may not have even been charged, because there are just too many other big fish out there to prosecute. In West Virginia, a case in the 2M range gets attention.
Most definitely and feds usually come around when it's dealing with Uncle Sam's money. They don't play about that almighty dollar
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
42,640
64,936
113
People plea because sentencing is tough, they get credit for cooperation, and the government’s case is good. People go to trial because they have a prior record and will get nailed with a lot of time on a plea, forcing them to roll the dice with a trial.