Federal Reserve Admits Biden/Democrat Immigration Policies are Responsible for Housing Affordability Crisis

[Scrubby]

30% increase in housing costs and 20% increase in rental prices all tied directly to illegal immigration that was welcomed by the democrats. This is one of many reasons Americans demand mass deportations and a return to sanity by electing Donald Trump.

Great job as always, libs.

 

[Scrubby]

It will be really fascinating when we are able to calculate just how much the left's border crisis ultimately cost Americans. Between mass welfare, fraud and driving up general cost of living (not to mention the violence) I predict the total price tag for the left's suicidal empathy on this front will be in the trillions of $

 

[baltimorened]

It will be really fascinating when we are able to calculate just how much the left's border crisis ultimately cost Americans. Between mass welfare, fraud and driving up general cost of living (not to mention the violence) I predict the total price tag for the left's suicidal empathy on this front will be in the trillions of $

if you believe it the law of supply and demand, it only stands to reason that more buyers would impact housing prices. I don't think I'd jump on the 30% number yet. Normally these kinds of studies have a tendency to be recalibrated.

Surprisingly, at least from what I read about same report, more workers did not reduce wages. I found that to be interesting. I would have thought the opposite.

 

[jimneffer]

if you believe it the law of supply and demand, it only stands to reason that more buyers would impact housing prices. I don't think I'd jump on the 30% number yet. Normally these kinds of studies have a tendency to be recalibrated.

Surprisingly, at least from what I read about same report, more workers did not reduce wages. I found that to be interesting. I would have thought the opposite.

you're making the mistake of actually being interested in the study and what it says

you're supposed to just read tweets, swallow whatever they say without question or second thought, and repost it

 

[dpic73]

It will be really fascinating when we are able to calculate just how much the left's border crisis ultimately cost Americans. Between mass welfare, fraud and driving up general cost of living (not to mention the violence) I predict the total price tag for the left's suicidal empathy on this front will be in the trillions of $

Very misleading.

Per Claude:

This tweet makes several distinct claims — worth separating the sourced one from the broader ones.

The Fed paper claim (bottom of the post)

This is real and mostly accurately characterized. A Dallas Fed working paper (not yet peer-reviewed, and the authors explicitly note it doesn't reflect official Fed views) found that between 2021-2024, unauthorized immigrant worker inflows explained about 30% of home price growth and 20% of rent growth in the average metro area studied. But there's an important nuance the headline glosses over: this isn't "prices rose 30% because of immigration." The actual math is that total house prices rose about 22.4% over the period, and immigration explains roughly 30% of that increase — implying immigration's contribution to average home prices was closer to 6-7 percentage points, not 30. Trump repeated the more dramatic framing in a Truth Social post; the Post's headline is a bit ambiguous but not outright false — it's just easy to misread as "immigration caused prices to rise 30%" rather than "explains 30% of the rise." The paper also found immigration boosted employment with no evidence of reduced average wages, which cuts against the "avoid working" framing in the tweet.

Cotton's broader claims

These don't hold up as well against the research base:

"Disproportionately commit crimes" — This runs opposite to the weight of evidence. Multiple studies (Texas arrest records by immigration status, NIJ, Cato, NBER) consistently find undocumented immigrants are arrested at less than half the rate of native-born citizens for violent and drug crimes, and a quarter the rate for property crimes. National studies overwhelmingly find immigrants of all legal statuses commit crimes at lower rates than the U.S.-born.

"Disproportionately use welfare" — Also runs opposite to policy reality. Under PRWORA, unauthorized immigrants are not eligible for most federal public benefits, including non-emergency Medicaid, SNAP, SSI, and TANF. They can't access federally funded healthcare or ACA marketplace coverage either. Exceptions are narrow: emergency Medicaid, community health centers, school lunch programs, and short-term emergency shelter. There's a separate think-tank estimate (EPIC for America) claiming high household-level usage, but that's counting U.S.-citizen children's eligibility within mixed-status households, not undocumented individuals' own eligibility — a meaningfully different claim.

"Avoid working" — Contradicted by the very Fed paper cited: it found immigrant workers raised local employment roughly one-for-one with no wage decline, which implies labor force participation, not avoidance.

So: the housing/rent statistic is real but somewhat oversold in the framing, and the crime/welfare/work claims in the tweet's setup aren't well supported by the research base — if anything the data points the other way on those three.

The reality

 

[ClemsonCO14]

Holy s*** this is hilarious. @Scrubby, why don’t you take a stab at supporting this acolyte work paper with actual data and common sense?

This could be fun!

 

[m.knox]

Very misleading.

Per Claude:

This tweet makes several distinct claims — worth separating the sourced one from the broader ones.

The Fed paper claim (bottom of the post)

This is real and mostly accurately characterized. A Dallas Fed working paper (not yet peer-reviewed, and the authors explicitly note it doesn't reflect official Fed views) found that between 2021-2024, unauthorized immigrant worker inflows explained about 30% of home price growth and 20% of rent growth in the average metro area studied. But there's an important nuance the headline glosses over: this isn't "prices rose 30% because of immigration." The actual math is that total house prices rose about 22.4% over the period, and immigration explains roughly 30% of that increase — implying immigration's contribution to average home prices was closer to 6-7 percentage points, not 30. Trump repeated the more dramatic framing in a Truth Social post; the Post's headline is a bit ambiguous but not outright false — it's just easy to misread as "immigration caused prices to rise 30%" rather than "explains 30% of the rise." The paper also found immigration boosted employment with no evidence of reduced average wages, which cuts against the "avoid working" framing in the tweet.

Cotton's broader claims

These don't hold up as well against the research base:

"Disproportionately commit crimes" — This runs opposite to the weight of evidence. Multiple studies (Texas arrest records by immigration status, NIJ, Cato, NBER) consistently find undocumented immigrants are arrested at less than half the rate of native-born citizens for violent and drug crimes, and a quarter the rate for property crimes. National studies overwhelmingly find immigrants of all legal statuses commit crimes at lower rates than the U.S.-born.

"Disproportionately use welfare" — Also runs opposite to policy reality. Under PRWORA, unauthorized immigrants are not eligible for most federal public benefits, including non-emergency Medicaid, SNAP, SSI, and TANF. They can't access federally funded healthcare or ACA marketplace coverage either. Exceptions are narrow: emergency Medicaid, community health centers, school lunch programs, and short-term emergency shelter. There's a separate think-tank estimate (EPIC for America) claiming high household-level usage, but that's counting U.S.-citizen children's eligibility within mixed-status households, not undocumented individuals' own eligibility — a meaningfully different claim.

"Avoid working" — Contradicted by the very Fed paper cited: it found immigrant workers raised local employment roughly one-for-one with no wage decline, which implies labor force participation, not avoidance.

So: the housing/rent statistic is real but somewhat oversold in the framing, and the crime/welfare/work claims in the tweet's setup aren't well supported by the research base — if anything the data points the other way on those three.

The reality

Bidenflation is very real. It sucked the life out to the middle class just like Keynes said.

"Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security but [also] at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth.

Those to whom the system brings windfalls, beyond their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires, become "profiteers," who are the object of the hatred of the bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism has impoverished, not less than of the proletariat. As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.

Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."

 

[dpic73]

Bidenflation is very real. It sucked the life out to the middle class just like Keynes said.

"Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security but [also] at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth.

Those to whom the system brings windfalls, beyond their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires, become "profiteers," who are the object of the hatred of the bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism has impoverished, not less than of the proletariat. As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.

Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."

Inflation was at 2.9% when Trump entered office Screech. What's happened to it since?

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

Yet another @Scrubby false claim.

But since this is your thread, any updates on the ongoing negotiations between the DOJ and Secret Service for Obama’s surrender?

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

 

[Scrubby]

Yet another @Scrubby false claim.

But since this is your thread, any updates on the ongoing negotiations between the DOJ and Secret Service for Obama’s surrender?

It's not my claim, it's the claims of the federal reserve. Now take your L and move along.

 

[Scrubby]

Inflation was at 2.9% when Trump entered office Screech. What's happened to it since?

Why did the democrats delete this? Was it because ALL prices went up an average 25% under sleepy joe and kamala coconut?

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

It's not my claim, it's the claims of the federal reserve. Now take your L and move along.

No it’s not. You have to actually read what was written, and not take the X post as accurate.

You’re embarrassing yourself here.

And given your lack of response, I assume you have no updates on your promised Obama surrender?

 

[Scrubby]

No it’s not. You have to actually read what was written, and not take the X post as accurate.

You’re embarrassing yourself here.

And given your lack of response, I assume you have no updates on your promised Obama surrender?

It is. The federal reserve agrees with the majority of Americans that biden sucked and was likely the worst president in US history.

I always predicted Obama would get away with his crimes btw. the intelligence folx he surrounded himself with that contributed to such crimes as russiagate are indeed going to prison though.

 

[PAWrocka]

It is. The federal reserve agrees with the majority of Americans that biden sucked and was likely the worst president in US history.

I always predicted Obama would get away with his crimes btw. the intelligence folx he surrounded himself with that contributed to such crimes as russiagate are indeed going to prison though.

Policy wise? Still Woodrow Wilson by a country mile.
Socially? Obama … without question.

 

[dpic73]

View attachment 1353138

Why did the democrats delete this? Was it because ALL prices went up an average 25% under sleepy joe and kamala coconut?

Smart people understand how the pandemic and supply chains affected prices during that period but this doesn't alter what I said. Inflation is much higher now than when Trump took office - you know, the thing he said he'd fix on day one?

"Grocery prices are at record highs, sitting significantly above pre-pandemic levels. Driven by rising global energy costs, geopolitical conflicts, and extreme weather, food inflation is outpacing the broader inflation rate. Compared to last year, food costs are up roughly 3% to 4%, with staples like beef and produce surging even higher"

https://thehill.com/business/personal-finance/5888142-groceries-just-had-the-biggest-price-hike-in-years-its-about-to-get-even-worse-experts-warn/

 

[baltimorened]

Inflation was at 2.9% when Trump entered office Screech. What's happened to it since?

that's valid point. But at the risk of pointing out the obvious, we all know that the reason is the Iran "excursion". Prior to that the rate was down to 2.4% ..and some of that was attributed to tariffs...

It's yet to be determined how this ceasefire will affect the rate.

 

[Scrubby]

Policy wise? Still Woodrow Wilson by a country mile.
Socially? Obama … without question.

Not a bad take by any means.

Smart people understand how the pandemic and supply chains affected prices during that period but this doesn't alter what I said. Inflation is much higher now than when Trump took office - you know, the thing he said he'd fix on day one?

"Grocery prices are at record highs, sitting significantly above pre-pandemic levels. Driven by rising global energy costs, geopolitical conflicts, and extreme weather, food inflation is outpacing the broader inflation rate. Compared to last year, food costs are up roughly 3% to 4%, with staples like beef and produce surging even higher"

https://thehill.com/business/personal-finance/5888142-groceries-just-had-the-biggest-price-hike-in-years-its-about-to-get-even-worse-experts-warn/

Weird how covid19 (which came out in 2019) caused 9.1% inflation in 2022 lmfao you're such a dunce. Inflation was the result of reckless spending by Biden on absolute leftist nonsense. We didn't even get any return on investment for the record spending biden was responsible for. He really was am awful president.

 

[jimneffer]

Not a bad take by any means.

Weird how covid19 (which came out in 2019) caused 9.1% inflation in 2022 lmfao you're such a dunce. Inflation was the result of reckless spending by Biden on absolute leftist nonsense. We didn't even get any return on investment for the record spending biden was responsible for. He really was am awful president.

inflation took off 6 to 8 weeks after biden inauguration - what specific policy caused that?

it had already broken and started coming down once the inflation reduction act was passed and took effect

if covid spending caused inflation - trump signed 2x more of it than biden did

 

[Scrubby]

that's valid point. But at the risk of pointing out the obvious, we all know that the reason is the Iran "excursion". Prior to that the rate was down to 2.4% ..and some of that was attributed to tariffs...

It's yet to be determined how this ceasefire will affect the rate.

Oil holding steady at 68 a barrel atm. Good indicator towards a lower rate of inflation

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

It is. The federal reserve agrees with the majority of Americans that biden sucked and was likely the worst president in US history.

I always predicted Obama would get away with his crimes btw. the intelligence folx he surrounded himself with that contributed to such crimes as russiagate are indeed going to prison though.

That’s not what the paper says. You should read it and compare it to the X post you posted.

I understand facts confuse you.

You would also learn it’s not the position of the Federal Reserve, as it is a working paper from one author that is circulated for comments.

So no updates on the Obama surrender you promised?

 

[baltimorened]

Very misleading.

Per Claude:

This tweet makes several distinct claims — worth separating the sourced one from the broader ones.

The Fed paper claim (bottom of the post)

This is real and mostly accurately characterized. A Dallas Fed working paper (not yet peer-reviewed, and the authors explicitly note it doesn't reflect official Fed views) found that between 2021-2024, unauthorized immigrant worker inflows explained about 30% of home price growth and 20% of rent growth in the average metro area studied. But there's an important nuance the headline glosses over: this isn't "prices rose 30% because of immigration." The actual math is that total house prices rose about 22.4% over the period, and immigration explains roughly 30% of that increase — implying immigration's contribution to average home prices was closer to 6-7 percentage points, not 30. Trump repeated the more dramatic framing in a Truth Social post; the Post's headline is a bit ambiguous but not outright false — it's just easy to misread as "immigration caused prices to rise 30%" rather than "explains 30% of the rise." The paper also found immigration boosted employment with no evidence of reduced average wages, which cuts against the "avoid working" framing in the tweet.

Cotton's broader claims

These don't hold up as well against the research base:

"Disproportionately commit crimes" — This runs opposite to the weight of evidence. Multiple studies (Texas arrest records by immigration status, NIJ, Cato, NBER) consistently find undocumented immigrants are arrested at less than half the rate of native-born citizens for violent and drug crimes, and a quarter the rate for property crimes. National studies overwhelmingly find immigrants of all legal statuses commit crimes at lower rates than the U.S.-born.

"Disproportionately use welfare" — Also runs opposite to policy reality. Under PRWORA, unauthorized immigrants are not eligible for most federal public benefits, including non-emergency Medicaid, SNAP, SSI, and TANF. They can't access federally funded healthcare or ACA marketplace coverage either. Exceptions are narrow: emergency Medicaid, community health centers, school lunch programs, and short-term emergency shelter. There's a separate think-tank estimate (EPIC for America) claiming high household-level usage, but that's counting U.S.-citizen children's eligibility within mixed-status households, not undocumented individuals' own eligibility — a meaningfully different claim.

"Avoid working" — Contradicted by the very Fed paper cited: it found immigrant workers raised local employment roughly one-for-one with no wage decline, which implies labor force participation, not avoidance.

So: the housing/rent statistic is real but somewhat oversold in the framing, and the crime/welfare/work claims in the tweet's setup aren't well supported by the research base — if anything the data points the other way on those three.

The reality

I agree with your assessment that saying housing prices and rent prices increased by 30 and 20% is not correct. That's one of the reasons I posted what I did earlier.

All the rest is great, except for the fact that while undocumented migrants might commit crimes less that citizens or use welfare disproportionately, it still remains a fact, that if those folks were not illegally in the US, there would be no migrant murders or welfare payments. And, that's apparently where all the disagreements come in. Some on here seem to support the illegal migrants being in the country illegally, )committing crimes and collecting welfare), and others think that not following the nation's immigration laws is the wrong way to go

 

[baltimorened]

It's not my claim, it's the claims of the federal reserve. Now take your L and move along.

nope scrubby, this time the claim of 20 and 30% increases is way overstated..

 

[Scrubby]

inflation took off 6 to 8 weeks after biden inauguration - what specific policy caused that?

it had already broken and started coming down once the inflation reduction act was passed and took effect

if covid spending caused inflation - trump signed 2x more of it than biden did

Trump left a trillion dollars in cash reserves for biden IF it was needed (it wasn't). Biden burned through that immediately, signed the "inflation reduction act" (which of course didn't reduce inflation and instead spent stupid amounts of money on leftist nonsense) and caused inflation to sky rocket. He spent more than trump did in his first term with this in mind (and my biggest criticism of trump 1.0 was the how much $ he spent)

Biden and the dems are also responsible for the needed spend on ICE reinforcement now btw.. all the increases costs of deportations (beyond the fraud, welfare, etc) are your fault too.

 

[jimneffer]

Trump left a trillion dollars in cash reserves for biden IF it was needed (it wasn't). Biden burned through that immediately, signed the "inflation reduction act" (which of course didn't reduce inflation and instead spent stupid amounts of money on leftist nonsense) and caused inflation to sky rocket. He spent more than trump did in his first term with this in mind (and my biggest criticism of trump 1.0 was the how much $ he spent)

Biden and the dems are also responsible for the needed spend on ICE reinforcement now btw.. all the increases costs of deportations (beyond the fraud, welfare, etc) are your fault too.

inflation began coming down right around when the IRA was passed and took effect. this is a fact.

was that act perfect? no
did it CAUSE inflation? absolutely not.

 

[dpic73]

I agree with your assessment that saying housing prices and rent prices increased by 30 and 20% is not correct. That's one of the reasons I posted what I did earlier.

All the rest is great, except for the fact that while undocumented migrants might commit crimes less that citizens or use welfare disproportionately, it still remains a fact, that if those folks were not illegally in the US, there would be no migrant murders or welfare payments. And, that's apparently where all the disagreements come in. Some on here seem to support the illegal migrants being in the country illegally, )committing crimes and collecting welfare), and others think that not following the nation's immigration laws is the wrong way to go

I'm challenging the rhetoric in the tweet. I don't need a lesson. Thanks

 

[dpic73]

Trump left a trillion dollars in cash reserves for biden IF it was needed (it wasn't). Biden burned through that immediately, signed the "inflation reduction act" (which of course didn't reduce inflation and instead spent stupid amounts of money on leftist nonsense) and caused inflation to sky rocket. He spent more than trump did in his first term with this in mind (and my biggest criticism of trump 1.0 was the how much $ he spent)

Biden and the dems are also responsible for the needed spend on ICE reinforcement now btw.. all the increases costs of deportations (beyond the fraud, welfare, etc) are your fault too.

Not NEEDED spend. CHOSEN OVERSPEND.

 

[Scrubby]

That’s not what the paper says. You should read it and compare it to the X post you posted.

I understand facts confuse you.

You would also learn it’s not the position of the Federal Reserve, as it is a working paper from one author that is circulated for comments.

So no updates on the Obama surrender you promised?

I never promised that? Why lie? Are the facts confusing you?

inflation began coming down right around when the IRA was passed and took effect. this is a fact.

was that act perfect? no
did it CAUSE inflation? absolutely not.

Bidenomics somehow got worse after this chart was put together

Not NEEDED spend. CHOSEN OVERSPEND.

 

[jimneffer]

I never promised that? Why lie? Are the facts confusing you?

View attachment 1353193

Bidenomics somehow got worse after this chart was put together

View attachment 1353194

more social media bullsh*t

us inflation - peaked in June 2022

12-month percentage change, Consumer Price Index, selected categories

www.bls.gov

inflation reduction act - signed into law in August 2022

Inflation Reduction Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

something that happened in August 2022 caused something that occurred from March 2021 to June 2022?
(don't worry, i know you're not going to actually answer or acknowledge this)

 

[dpic73]

I never promised that? Why lie? Are the facts confusing you?

View attachment 1353193

Bidenomics somehow got worse after this chart was put together

View attachment 1353194

You're such a fvkking loser. This is why America hates maga



No, that exact quote is not real — it doesn't appear in the diary.

Here's the actual situation:

The diary is real. A diary purportedly belonging to Ashley Biden was leaked by the right-wing blog National File in October 2020, weeks before the election. Ashley Biden herself confirmed the diary's authenticity in an April 2024 letter to a judge in a related legal case (a woman was convicted of stealing and selling the diary). Snopes

This specific quote is fabricated. Fact-checkers reviewed all 112 pages of the leaked diary PDF and found no passage resembling "I so afraid of him coming in the shower with me that I've waited until late at night to take a shower." It doesn't exist in the document — not on pages 67-68 or anywhere else. Snopes

What the diary actually contains, on the topic of showers: The diary does include a passage where Ashley Biden reflects on feeling "hyper-sexualized" at a young age, mentioning discomfort at a certain family's house, having sex with friends at a young age, and a brief note about "showers w/my dad (probably not appropriate)." That's a real but much shorter and differently worded entry than the viral quote — no mention of fear, waiting until late at night, etc. Snopes

So the meme takes a genuine but ambiguous fragment and turns it into a much more dramatic, specific, and fabricated quote attributed to a real diary and a real page range, which is a classic technique for making misinformation feel verifiable

https://claude.ai/chat/46f071d3-3494-4a59-9541-28448219f00d

 

[bdgan]

Very misleading.

A Dallas Fed working paper (not yet peer-reviewed, and the authors explicitly note it doesn't reflect official Fed views) found that between 2021-2024, unauthorized immigrant worker inflows explained about 30% of home price growth and 20% of rent growth in the average metro area studied.

I agree that some responses are misleading. The working paper suggests that illegal immigration accounts for 30% home price growth. It does not say that it accounts for 30% price growth. That's a big difference but it seems obvious that it was a factor.

 

[baltimorened]

I'm challenging the rhetoric in the tweet. I don't need a lesson. Thanks

no lesson implied. Simply, you're for enforcing immigration laws or you're not.

 

[Scrubby]

You're such a fvkking loser. This is why America hates maga



No, that exact quote is not real — it doesn't appear in the diary.

Here's the actual situation:

The diary is real. A diary purportedly belonging to Ashley Biden was leaked by the right-wing blog National File in October 2020, weeks before the election. Ashley Biden herself confirmed the diary's authenticity in an April 2024 letter to a judge in a related legal case (a woman was convicted of stealing and selling the diary). Snopes

This specific quote is fabricated. Fact-checkers reviewed all 112 pages of the leaked diary PDF and found no passage resembling "I so afraid of him coming in the shower with me that I've waited until late at night to take a shower." It doesn't exist in the document — not on pages 67-68 or anywhere else. Snopes

What the diary actually contains, on the topic of showers: The diary does include a passage where Ashley Biden reflects on feeling "hyper-sexualized" at a young age, mentioning discomfort at a certain family's house, having sex with friends at a young age, and a brief note about "showers w/my dad (probably not appropriate)." That's a real but much shorter and differently worded entry than the viral quote — no mention of fear, waiting until late at night, etc. Snopes

So the meme takes a genuine but ambiguous fragment and turns it into a much more dramatic, specific, and fabricated quote attributed to a real diary and a real page range, which is a classic technique for making misinformation feel verifiable

https://claude.ai/chat/46f071d3-3494-4a59-9541-28448219f00d

America hates maga? Trump just won the last election in a landslide you drooling idiot. Trump won every single swing state and the popular vote. America hates you mouth breathing leftists tripping over yourselves to opine about your fake virtues and I have the election maps to prove it.

Tap out now. As always, the longer this goes the dumber you look. You're not mentally equipped to take me and my Harvard education on.

 

[dpic73]

America hates maga? Trump just won the last election in a landslide you drooling idiot. Trump won every single swing state and the popular vote. America hates you mouth breathing leftists tripping over yourselves to opine about your fake virtues and I have the election maps to prove it.

Tap out now. As always, the longer this goes the dumber you look. You're not mentally equipped to take me and my Harvard education on.

America didn't love him then either, they barely chose him by a slim popular vote margin because of the things he promised them then ignored after he was elected Mr Stuck in Nov. 2024. And now he's historically unpopular and you are too. You and the hard-core magats are a pox on this country and you can't die off soon enough.

 

[Scrubby]

America didn't love him then either, they barely chose him by a slim popular vote margin because of the things he promised them then ignored after he was elected Mr Stuck in Nov. 2024. And now he's historically unpopular and you are too. You and the hard-core magats are a pox on this country and you can't die off soon enough.

Fact: Trump is more popular than Obama.

Don't worry comrade, unlike you and your fellow lefties who either can't get laid or murder their children before they're born, I am an active breeder. My children will inherit the United States as you cockroaches are removed from the gene pool. Statistics are in the right's favor and it's not particularly close.

 

[dpic73]

Fact: Trump is more popular than Obama.

Don't worry comrade, unlike you and your fellow lefties who either can't get laid or murder their children before they're born, I am an active breeder. My children will inherit the United States as you cockroaches are removed from the gene pool. Statistics are in the right's favor and it's not particularly close.

dErP

Recent polling shows Barack Obama leading Donald Trump by a wide margin in both public favorability and hypothetical matchups. A CNN Poll found Obama has a 57% favorability rating compared to 34% for Trump. Additionally, a hypothetical 2028 matchup by the Daily Mail and J.L. Partners showed Obama defeating Trump 52% to 41%. [1, 2, 3, 4]

For an analysis of how these polling figures break down across demographics and political parties:

 

[Scrubby]

dErP

Recent polling shows Barack Obama leading Donald Trump by a wide margin in both public favorability and hypothetical matchups. A CNN Poll found Obama has a 57% favorability rating compared to 34% for Trump. Additionally, a hypothetical 2028 matchup by the Daily Mail and J.L. Partners showed Obama defeating Trump 52% to 41%. [1, 2, 3, 4]

For an analysis of how these polling figures break down across demographics and political parties:

Nearly 15 million more people voted for trump in 2024 vs 2016. Obama could only dream of getting trump vote totals. It's not even close lol

Obama was a giant fraud and his landmark legislation turned out to be the giant turd that Republicans predicted all along. History will not be kind to him, especially as his inner circle begins going to prison.

 

[jimneffer]

Nearly 15 million more people voted for trump in 2024 vs 2016. Obama could only dream of getting trump vote totals. It's not even close lol

Obama was a giant fraud and his landmark legislation turned out to be the giant turd that Republicans predicted all along. History will not be kind to him, especially as his inner circle begins going to prison.

any day now (day 1,765)

 

[dpic73]

Nearly 15 million more people voted for trump in 2024 vs 2016. Obama could only dream of getting trump vote totals. It's not even close lol

Obama was a giant fraud and his landmark legislation turned out to be the giant turd that Republicans predicted all along. History will not be kind to him, especially as his inner circle begins going to prison.

I can't figure it out!

"The nation grew from about 323 million in 2016 to surpass 340 million by 2024"

New 2024 Population Estimates Show Nation’s Population Grew by About 1% to 340.1 Million Since 2023

The nation’s population grew by about 1% from 2023 to 2024, outpacing average annual growth since 2000 and signaling an end to tepid growth.

www.census.gov

AND I REPEAT

Recent polling shows Barack Obama leading Donald Trump by a wide margin in both public favorability and hypothetical matchups. A CNN Poll found Obama has a 57% favorability rating compared to 34% for Trump. Additionally, a hypothetical 2028 matchup by the Daily Mail and J.L. Partners showed Obama defeating Trump 52% to 41%. [1, 2, 3, 4]

 

[Scrubby]

I can't figure it out!

"The nation grew from about 323 million in 2016 to surpass 340 million by 2024"

New 2024 Population Estimates Show Nation’s Population Grew by About 1% to 340.1 Million Since 2023

The nation’s population grew by about 1% from 2023 to 2024, outpacing average annual growth since 2000 and signaling an end to tepid growth.

www.census.gov

AND I REPEAT

Recent polling shows Barack Obama leading Donald Trump by a wide margin in both public favorability and hypothetical matchups. A CNN Poll found Obama has a 57% favorability rating compared to 34% for Trump. Additionally, a hypothetical 2028 matchup by the Daily Mail and J.L. Partners showed Obama defeating Trump 52% to 41%. [1, 2, 3, 4]

So 100% of population growth sided with Trump? Amazing!!!

LOL @ "according to this leftist poll Ivama isn't as hated as most people believe" that bum stiffed a bunch of black contractors who built his trash can looking library. Bot a good man (and also married to a dude)