2026 World Cup - General Discussion & Non-USA teams thread

NewEra 2026

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
720
1,338
93
What you detail which I have placed in bold is an older version of the offside rule. About 10 years ago (give or take) the rule was modified to exclude any part of an offensive player that can not be used to score a goal.

The current IFAB Laws of the Game, for Law 11, state:

"1. Offside postion
It is not an offense to be in an offside position.

A player is in an offside position if:
  • any part of the head, body or feet is in the opponents' half (excluding the halfway line) and
  • any part of the head, body or feet is nearer to the opponents' goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent
The hands and arms of all players, including the goalkeepers, are not considered. For the purposes of determining offside, the upper boundary of the arm is in line with the bottom of the armpit."

I don't think that your proposal would change things all that much. it probably would lead to a few more goals. The bigger issue with it, IMHO, is that it would be significantly more difficult for an AR to determine if a player was offsides or not. Even the aforementioned change that allowed an offensive player's hand or arm to be ahead of the second-to-the-last defender took a year or two for refs to get comfortable with. And while VAR could help with what you're proposing, 99.99% of the games played around the world are not played with VAR.
Alternatively, if there isn’t daylight between the defender and the attacker, the ref’s flag stays down and the play continues on the field. I’m ok with that.
 

Grant Green

All-American
Jan 21, 2004
3,749
5,223
113
Just a bit of friendly advice. We do it this way because we've always done it this way isnt usually a winning argument.
How about, we've developed and tweaked it over 150 years to get to the point where our experience tells us it's about as good as it can be. That's more the angle I was shooting for, but thanks for the advice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Erial_Lion

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
6,128
3,518
113
How about, we've developed and tweaked it over 150 years to get to the point where our experience tells us it's about as good as it can be. That's more the angle I was shooting for, but thanks for the advice.
And in the next 150 years will it continue to be altered? Of course...that's the point. Almost no rule is perfect or above being questioned.