If you could pick one basketball season KY could have won it all which would it be?

MdWIldcat55

Heisman
Dec 9, 2007
21,512
86,482
113
I think there is only one rational answer to this question: 1975.

Kentucky adds a title, UCLA loses one. The Cats are that much closer to the only major achievement held by another program: most NCAA titles. It also would have capped my favorite tournament of all time, and brought greater meaning to the greatest Kentucky win of my lifetime, over Indiana in the Elite 8.

On a purely emotional basis, probably 2015. My son was the perfect age to have celebrated another title with. And that 40-0 perfect season would have probably stood forever as the greatest single season in the sport.

But since the challenge is to pick one, I'll stick with 1975
 
Jun 10, 2026
130
220
43
2014 no doubt without hesitation. 40-0. Probably will never be done. There were so many games we should have lost even that season but pulled them out.

Plus if we win that one then Calapari probably doesn't get broken. He would have went 40-0 keeping the legendary momentum going instead of the fall off. More than likely leading to a couple more titles because he would have kept getting the best.

That changes history the most imo.
 

darkshadesofblue

All-Conference
Aug 18, 2015
3,687
4,256
103
Might sound crazy but I’ll say 2005. Had we done enough to beat MSU in OT, I think we carry some of that momentum into the UNC and we edge Carolina. They had already beaten us soundly earlier that year but I think we adjust in game 2. Illinois would’ve been tough but it would’ve been interesting. I’ll also say 2011 if DeAndre makes that corner 3..
 

TheBlueMist

All-American
Feb 5, 2004
2,108
5,111
113
1966 or 1975. While I wish the 2015 squad won it all, obviously, If I could only choose one, I would skip that year. If they won that year, there is a good chance Cal would still be here and more smug and elitist (having gone undefeated) than I could tolerate.

1984, 1992, 1997, 2004, and 2010 are also good choices.
 

Wunky

Heisman
Jan 16, 2021
4,425
18,440
78
I get the argument for 1975, and also for ‘97 (although I don’t think the ‘98 Cats have the will to pull the comeback against Duke if we had won in ‘97), but for me it’s 2015 and it really isn’t all that close. I always thought if we could have pulled that off, we should have hung a banner that was white with blue letters, so it would be different from all the rest, to signify the undefeated season. Would have been so cool.

Cal really blew it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowtown Cat

BlueSince92

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
10,920
3,670
230
'97

It would take the tiniest nudge. You don't take the champion to overtime with your best player on the bench all game if you couldn't have buried that "champion" with him able to play.

Also there's at least some chance Pitino would have decided to stick around after back-to-back titles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowtown Cat

The Ganner

Senior
Nov 21, 2009
366
958
93
Got to go with 2015. Choosing only from 1995 on, that's the first year I remember watching us lose in the tournament. I know I watched in 93, 94, but can't remember individual games. 2003 is runner up for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowtown Cat

mhs1964

Senior
Feb 8, 2018
415
451
58
My immediately thought of 97 for the three-peat just as mdwildcat also immediately responded. However, everyone has made great arguments for many other years. Just shows how blessed we have been. This new and still changing era will unlikely provide as many great, though sometimes heartbreaking, memories.
 

Smeegs

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2025
988
2,848
93
I’ll put in a word for 86. I loved that team …Skywalker, Bennett and the Harden/Davender/Blackmon three guard lineup running the new faster paced system …that team was a joy to watch. I’ve always thought 86 doesn’t get enough credit when we talk about favorite UK teams of the past.

Plus that would take the 86 title away from UL. Which is certainly a nice bonus.
 
Aug 23, 2024
2,634
5,879
113
'97

It would take the tiniest nudge. You don't take the champion to overtime with your best player on the bench all game if you couldn't have buried that "champion" with him able to play.

Also there's at least some chance Pitino would have decided to stick around after back-to-back titles.
The ref's need a mention whenever talking about that game. Arizona went over ten minutes without a field goal at the end of that game but the ref's still put them on the line enough to steal a championship from UK.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Cowtown Cat

KP79

Redshirt
Oct 19, 2021
1
1
0
Mine would be the 96-97 season. That's when my UK fandom was at its peak and it would have been a 3-peat which is super rare in sports. If Derek Anderson wasn't injured I think we would have beat Arizona in the Final.
Agreed. Also, remember Allen Edwards was battling injury too. At 100%, he'd have kept Simon in check.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowtown Cat

Ash Williams

Heisman
Aug 3, 2022
8,433
26,763
113
2014 no doubt without hesitation. 40-0. Probably will never be done. There were so many games we should have lost even that season but pulled them out.

Plus if we win that one then Calapari probably doesn't get broken. He would have went 40-0 keeping the legendary momentum going instead of the fall off. More than likely leading to a couple more titles because he would have kept getting the best.

That changes history the most imo.
That was 2015.
 

LineSkiCat14

Heisman
Aug 5, 2015
39,446
62,050
113
2014/15 easily.. and aside from maybe 97 for a 3-peat, it shouldnt be close.

We would have been immortal. Can you imagine someone saying "well I think this team in such and such year was better". Yeah? Well did they go 40-0? No? Well then that means you should..

stfu GIF


That team is the best team of all time. No debate. Cal gets 2 titles, Duke with one less, might have fixed a few things. Maybe with Cal/UK having two titles (and undefeated), Kentucky really starts to generate fandom and good will with the NCAA. 40-0 would do nothing but generate revenue and viewership. It would be great for the sport for a team to do that.