Continued Mass Election Fraud

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,427
27,300
113
This is what you and the left do, make claims then get mad if people ask for proof and wont just accept your claims as truth...

WTF are you jabbering about? You respond to a post from a year and a half ago to claim that no one has offered proof that the election wasn't stolen? Are you mad?

oh the irony

Irony would mean that I will also believe anything a cartoonish right-wing influencer states, despite the facts. Is that what we're going with here? 😅 🤤

1782307300650.png
 

Thefunksouljon

All-Conference
Jan 26, 2004
1,613
3,007
113
So with all the obvious and known election frauds, does the President's DOJ have any convictions for mass election fraud to date? It's been over a year.
 

Rifler

All-American
Jan 26, 2011
5,085
5,903
113
Plotting The Simpsons GIF
 

TigerRagRob

Heisman
Sep 23, 2001
23,350
14,548
113
WTF are you jabbering about? You respond to a post from a year and a half ago to claim that no one has offered proof that the election wasn't stolen? Are you mad?



Irony would mean that I will also believe anything a cartoonish right-wing influencer states, despite the facts. Is that what we're going with here? 😅 🤤

View attachment 1338702
No you believe everything a leftist clown influencer says without question. Then get mad when people on the right dont believe your sources....
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73

baltimorened

All-American
May 29, 2001
7,212
5,358
113
So with all the obvious and known election frauds, does the President's DOJ have any convictions for mass election fraud to date? It's been over a year.
well you know the same could be said for all the convictions from the release of 3 million pages of the Epstein files.
 

Thefunksouljon

All-Conference
Jan 26, 2004
1,613
3,007
113
well you know the same could be said for all the convictions from the release of 3 million pages of the Epstein files.


You could say it, but that would be using deception to compare the 2.

One scenario is an admin claiming there is wrong doing, stating convictions any week, but nothing of substance has appeared against the admin's "opponents".
The other is an admin actively hiding and suppressing congressionally legislated information and potential evidence that may (or may not) implicate that same admin in wrong doings. And several arrests / convictions have occurred.

So.... no, they are not the same. Primarily due to the motivation and who is being protected and who is in charge. If the Epstein files had all the dirt on Democrats, you know Trump's DOJ would be releasing files and going after folks. Instead, they are skirting and playing games and all the files are not released nor do folks have access to all the information in some of the released files.

Now do I think there is some smoking gun for Trump in the files? Longer they drag feet the more suspicious it looks, but Im not holding my breath, Im only replying to your "both sides" post being incorrect.

edit - Now if you are trying to just say the Trump DOJ is incompetent and unable to secure the hundreds of convictions it has alluded to, then yes, both are the same because the Trump DOJ has failed to do anything of substance in multiple areas.
 
Last edited:

fsu1jreed

Heisman
Apr 1, 2002
9,250
17,178
113
WTF are you jabbering about? You respond to a post from a year and a half ago to claim that no one has offered proof that the election wasn't stolen? Are you mad?

he's too dumb to know you can't prove a negative
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,427
27,300
113
he's too dumb to know you can't prove a negative
Also too dumb to realize that after 6 years and the biggest proctology exam on an election in our history, there isn't the tiniest bit of evidence of mass election fraud. Not even a whisper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsu1jreed

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
35,992
113


You cannot have both late ballots after Election Day and no voter ID or proof of citizenship. That combination will prove fatal and the United States as we know it will cease to exist.

Our democracy is standing on the edge of a very dangerous precipice.

Pass the SAVE Act right now!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,427
27,300
113
Fake ballots inserted into the count after all other ballots are counted to change the winner. Its simple dpic.
They have individual barcodes that only match one person who also has to sign it and in many cases, like here in Georgia, you have to include a copy of your license. There's nothing fraudulent about it but if you insist that's true, then Trump and the Rs in Congress won due to fraudulent votes, since the same system was in place in 2024.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ilovewrestling

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
35,992
113
They have individual barcodes that only match one person who also has to sign it and in many cases, like here in Georgia, you have to include a copy of your license. There's nothing fraudulent about it but if you insist that's true, then Trump and the Rs in Congress won due to fraudulent votes, since the same system was in place in 2024.
Fake ballot means to a fake or illegal person and blue states do not use bar codes on the thousands of ballots they mail to po boxes and homeless shelters. You dems are screaming bloody murder that Trump signed the EO on the mail ballots. Come on man.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,427
27,300
113
Fake ballot means to a fake or illegal person and blue states do not use bar codes on the thousands of ballots they mail to po boxes and homeless shelters. You dems are screaming bloody murder that Trump signed the EO on the mail ballots. Come on man.
You are lying and it's long past time to put up or shut up. We are not Venezuela, there has been NO mass election fraud and it's never come close to being proven but you don't care because of your conspiracy-addled brain. You just don't want democrats to vote - that's it and that is not democracy.

"While the actual paper ballot you mark might not have a barcode, the envelopes almost universally do"

 

ClemsonCO14

All-Conference
Dec 11, 2016
412
1,226
87
You are lying and it's long past time to put up or shut up. We are not Venezuela, there has been NO mass election fraud and it's never come close to being proven but you don't care because of your conspiracy-addled brain. You just don't want democrats to vote - that's it and that is not democracy.

"While the actual paper ballot you mark might not have a barcode, the envelopes almost universally do"

Seriously, @TigerGrowls, it’s time to put up or shut the f*** up. Have you ever thought about the number of people, sophisticated operating logistics, and complex execution required to commit this fraud at scale? It boggles the mind that not a shred of evidence has been produced to support mass fraud, but you / MAGA commit so much of your time to the topic.

Mail-in leads Democrat - that’s why Trump wants to eliminate it.

You’re a simple-minded sheep and I’m starting to sense you know it.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
35,992
113
You are lying and it's long past time to put up or shut up. We are not Venezuela, there has been NO mass election fraud and it's never come close to being proven but you don't care because of your conspiracy-addled brain. You just don't want democrats to vote - that's it and that is not democracy.

"While the actual paper ballot you mark might not have a barcode, the envelopes almost universally do"

The Brennan Center....lmfao!!!
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
35,992
113
Seriously, @TigerGrowls, it’s time to put up or shut the f*** up. Have you ever thought about the number of people, sophisticated operating logistics, and complex execution required to commit this fraud at scale? It boggles the mind that not a shred of evidence has been produced to support mass fraud, but you / MAGA commit so much of your time to the topic.

Mail-in leads Democrat - that’s why Trump wants to eliminate it.

You’re a simple-minded sheep and I’m starting to sense you know it.
Im not the govt. Im hoping the DOJ drops the hammer on this communist theft of elections.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
35,992
113
You are lying and it's long past time to put up or shut up. We are not Venezuela, there has been NO mass election fraud and it's never come close to being proven but you don't care because of your conspiracy-addled brain. You just don't want democrats to vote - that's it and that is not democracy.

"While the actual paper ballot you mark might not have a barcode, the envelopes almost universally do"

Read carefully.



would encourage everyone to relax on the two big “losses” at the Supreme Court.

Step back.

There’s something bigger happening.

Though I missed most of the news happening yesterday.

Trump’s reaction to his loss on “mail in ballots” was eye opening to me, because Trump didn’t seem too phased by the ruling.

He used some wording in his response, which downplayed the ruling and I think that was the KEY.

youtu.be/xGSNlA7-vBA?si…

Did you catch the part everyone missed?

“basically, they’re keeping it a little way that it is now”

Reminder.

Trump isn’t trying to get rid of ALL mail in ballots.
Just the fraudulent ones.

The largest group of “mail in ballots” come from the military.

Anybody remember the Bush vs Gore election?

“Gov. George W. Bush sued election officials in 13 Florida counties today for rejecting the absentee ballots of members of the military serving abroad, capitalizing on an issue that has been a public relations boon to the Republicans and that could determine the fate of hundreds of votes for the presidency.”

nytimes.com/2000/11/23/us/…

Now if anybody’s vote should be protected, it should definitely be the people who are risking their lives to protect our freedoms.
Trump is going to protect the “mail in ballots” of our military personnel.

But why did Trump say, the Supreme Court ruling was basically keeping it “a little” the way it is now?

The Supreme Court didn’t prevent ballots received AFTER election day from being counted, but did require the ballots to be “postmarked” by election day.

Why is that a big deal?

GAME THEORY.

Trump AND the Supreme Court are in the process of removing the avenues for cheating through mail in ballots in the FUTURE, while at the same time, preventing the future lawsuits that try and prevent military ballots that were mailed by election day.

Don’t forget:

The U.S. Postal Service is refusing all “mail in ballots” that are not verified by the federal registry proving citizenship.
And the Postal Service owns a patent on blockchain technology associated with “mail in ballots.”

None of this is a coincidence.

What looked like a loss, actually helped cement in the Constitution, that ALL mail in ballots must be “postmarked” by election day.
Blockchain technology will be used to “prove” that postmark in the FUTURE.

Never forget that Trump is playing the “long game” and trying to establish as many legal “safeguards” as possible.

Same with the birthright citizenship “loss.”

It looks really bad, but most people are missing the same “playbook” by Kavanaugh, when Trump took his first loss at the Supreme Court over tariffs.

Trump purposely used a specific law on tariffs that was rejected by the Supreme Court.
He knew it would be rejected.
Trump was purposely “limiting” the broad use of that specific law by past presidents, so that presidents in the FUTURE, can’t use it to get rid of his tariffs.

What did Trump do?

The same day, he took Kavanaugh’s “advice” and reinstated the tariffs using the law that is now deemed Constitutional.

Kavanaugh just did the same thing with “birthright citizenship.”

He outlined the legal pathway that the Supreme Court will approve, for “ending” birthright citizenship.

From Senator Eric Schmitt:
——————
“The majority tried to constitutionalize unlimited birthright citizenship. But Justice Kavanaugh MAY have left Congress a door.”

“I’m filing legislation to walk through it.”

“And I’ll keep working on a constitutional amendment to restore American citizenship.”
———————
Rand Paul has also declared that he is for the amendment.

Have you noticed Rand has flipped and now supporting Trump?

Trump is playing the long game and this “loss,” will be turned into a “win” but more importantly, immigration law will be permanently changed to prevent birthright citizenship in the FUTURE.

What’s happened at the Supreme Court over the last two days, is not the end of the story.

The “end results” are what really matters and that’s the game that Trump is playing.