YUGE L for the Dems earlier today
- Thread starter JohnHughsPartner
- Start date
I think most people are fine with this
Why would anyone be shocked with this Supreme Court ruling for States' Rights?
OP needs the topic to divide so he can keep hating "the other team". Regardless of most people's actual position on the topic.
Hopefully it affects youth wrestling as well. Im tired of seeing little girls whip little boys *** on the mat.
Thread title is confusing. Most dems don’t want boys playing in girls sports.
Shh. Let him pretend in his rage fantasy world.
"It's not even happening."
"How does it affect you?!"
"It's only a couple of broads who need to step aside for iNcLuSioN."
"Suck it up and get good, ladies. Train harder and quit bitching."
"Congratulations on a race well-run!"
"I was just trying to be kind!"
"I don't really care either way."
"Most of us never even wanted this anyway." <------------ We are here on the timeline.
"We were NEVER in favor of this."
"What? LOL, none of that ever happened."
Almost every Dem I'm friends with would agree males dont belong in female sports. Who's this a huge blow to exactly?
I would agree with these. I'm further left than most on this board and I don't care for Trans folks in Women's sports. Furthermore, I'm fine with Trump being able to fire the heads of the executive run federal agencies. I do think it's VERY STUPID, but it's his show.
OH no! With that "huge blow" statement, you've opened us up to JHP doing what he does.
I have no issue with keeping trans women out of womens' sports. It simply isn't an issue, despite MAGA efforts to try and make it one. This legislation affects virtually no one.
I disagree with you on the virtual overruling of the Humphreys' Executor opinion. .There are several agencies (the NLRB, the FTC, and the SEC are three of which I am aware) that were designed by Congress to operate as "independent agencies." Giving the President (whatever political party he may represent) the power to fire the heads of such agencies at will, and without cause, directly undermines that independence. I would say it eviscerates it. My guess is that this Supreme Court ruling ultimately gets reversed via legislative action precluding presidential dismissal of these agency heads without cause.
Last edited:
"I don't really care either way." <------------ @LafayetteBear is here on the timeline.
Last edited:
@alaskanseminole
@hawkeyetraveler
What do you well-reasoned gentlemen think about these absoluteGIRLS/WOMEN being banned from female sports?
We already know what "Never ran a lap nor hit a layup" Fat @Torbee believes.
@hawkeyetraveler
What do you well-reasoned gentlemen think about these absoluteGIRLS/WOMEN being banned from female sports?
We already know what "Never ran a lap nor hit a layup" Fat @Torbee believes.
"Most of us never even wanted this anyway." <------------ We are here on the timeline.
What do I think about biological men competing in women's athletics? Well, I've stated my opinion on that matter more than a dozen times between the various boards, so I think you should answer it for me since you apparently know all of my beliefs.
This no-balls dude WILL NOT take a stand.
Time and again.
Just say it, numbnutz.
CAN
MALES
BE
FEMALE?
I never once said I was good with bio males in women’s sports, nutbag.
Why do you post on various boards? Do you not have a life?
"bio males" What a goddamnedretardo.
"Male" and "Female" ARE biological terms, you phuckin' dipshit.
Why be redundant?
Oh, 'cause of your ideology.
You got me. You were right all along. Supreme Court agrees with you. Your work is done. You won. Might as well just move along now.
"bio males" What a goddamnedretardo.
"Male" and "Female" ARE biological terms, you phuckin' dipshit.
Why be redundant?
Oh, 'cause of your ideology.
Most Dems I know don’t believe biological males should compete in girls sports.
Now that the most pressing political issue has been solved, perhaps we could move on to lesser issues like…oh, I don’t know, housing, inflation, Iran…ya know, the trivial sh*t.
Then those aren't true executive agencies, correct? Congress should clear that up as you say, with legislative action. And don't get me wrong, I think a POTUS firing all the heads of agencies for political views is VERY stupid.
That's the only possibility?
or....
Rivals HROT got bought out by On3 to create On3 HROT, then Gibbs got the other board shut down, so we took over yours. It's really just the one board, just different hosts.
Minnesota did have a boy pitch his high school softball team to a state title last year.
that’s not one kid it affected. Every team they beat out along the way was a roster full of girls that got cheated.
And most Clemson fans don’t want fucktard Iowa fans infesting our board … yet … here we are.
So is that you throwing in the white towel admitting (FINALLY) that you don't know my beliefs? ....becuase on this particular topic I've been VERY specific. You're either:
A. stalking me
B. lying about me
C. clueless
D. a troll.
E. ALL OF THE ABOVE
ONE poster on the Iowa site openly argued and supported it, but don't let his lies get in the way of a good story, though.
SO WHAT?!
@Torbee
@JWolf74
@Moral
@McLovin32
@AFM22
@hawkeyetraveler
@alaskanseminole
@TomKakert
@therestofem