Kyler is the smaller one you mean KalebAppropriate comment for page 7 of this thread.
Speaking of which - it looks like ASU's Kyler Larkin, who was a fourth year freshman this past season, Columbia's Joe Curtis (three mission years), and Wisconsin's Braxton Amos (deferment, Oly shirt, red shirt) will be the last of the seven year guys.
Unless we can get some military deferments to wrestle. Or early grad high school nerds to gray shirt twice. I obviously have a hope for the latter.
That's how I spell KalebKyler is the smaller one you mean Kaleb
Zero chance of this lineup.2026
125 LUKE
133 BLAZE
141 DESOMOND
149 SVN
157 KASAK
165 MITCH
174 PJ
184 ROCCO
197 BARR
HVY CONNOR!
A one year start (if that) was never a long term solution for many of the above. And many of the above were underdogs to ever start under any system.Zero chance of this lineup.
5 for 5 hurts PSU more than any other team in terms of several guys would have gotten at least a one year start if not more while others shirt.
With the word James has already enrolled, it's starting to look like Sealy, Kasak, Desmond, Davis, Henckel, Cunningham, and Perry never earn full time starter stripes going forward, and my bet would be 2 or 3 portal out.
Unless Ono is injured Desmond is out, and Despite Kasak being a finalist talent assuming his head is healed, I think we see James at 157.
Oh, did I say 5 for 5 can suck it!
The combo of alternating redshirts, Oly shirts and potential injury would give several of those kids more than just one year.A one year start (if that) was never a long term solution for many of the above. And many of the above were underdogs to ever start under any system.
I heard rumblings of 5 for 5 last summer, I’m sure Cael did too which was probably why both Blaze and Duke wrestled.
I’m a fan of 5 for 5. I’d rather see Blaze, Duke, and James rather than alternatives.
doubtfulI am so, so, so happy for 5-for-5. After the start of the season, it will likely put an end to Googles endless laments about what Cael is going to do about the lineup.
Or maybe not. Not sure when he will figure out that it will be like every other year since 2016 - put the best lineup out there you have in the postseason. Until 2nd semester, nothing is set in stone.
The endless inane ramblings that must sound good to him on paper, but NEVER actually incorporate what goes on with the lineup decisions have to stop sometime, don't you think. 5-for-5 may be the answer!!!
There was no doubt who was getting the 157 nod and the decision was objective.I won't doubt Kasak till he gets beat out,I dont think they had a wrestle off last yr just gave PJ the weight!
2026
125 LUKE
133 BLAZE
141 DESOMOND
149 SVN
157 KASAK
165 MITCH
174 PJ
184 ROCCO
197 BARR
HVY CONNOR!
Going back to the original post...What will our line up be in 2026-2027?2026
125 LUKE
133 BLAZE
141 DESOMOND
149 SVN
157 KASAK
165 MITCH
174 PJ
184 ROCCO
197 BARR
HVY CONNOR!
Going back to the original post...What will our line up be in 2026-2027?
Noting that there is exactly ZERO benefit to any kind of sitting out...is there reason for PJ and Mitchell sitting out this summer (which they do not typically do)? I think they are making a transition up weight classes, although my 1 doubt would be the Olympic/International spot Messenbrink will be targeting (74 kg) is at his current weight. Would he go up to 174 which is 79 kg (173.8 lbs)??? Is that a cut he wants to make in 2 years because I do not see him at 86 kg, his frame simply is not that big.
With that considered, I still have Mitchell making the move to 174 here:
WT STARTER 2ND TEAM NOTED OTHERS COMING IN 2027
125 Lilledahl Wentzel Sidun
133 Ono Desmond Burnett
141 Blaze Davis Herring
149 Van Ness Pierce Perry Mangano
157 Kasak OR James Shepherd
165 Duke Sealey
174 Messenbrink Henckel
184 Welsh Cunningham
197 Barr Ellis
285 Connor Mirasola Cole Mirasola
So, I "think" we go
125 Lilledahl
133 Ono
141 Blaze
149 Van Ness
157 James
165 Duke
174 Messenbrink
184 Welsh
197 Barr
285 Connor M
Additional note:Going back to the original post...What will our line up be in 2026-2027?
Noting that there is exactly ZERO benefit to any kind of sitting out...is there reason for PJ and Mitchell sitting out this summer (which they do not typically do)? I think they are making a transition up weight classes, although my 1 doubt would be the Olympic/International spot Messenbrink will be targeting (74 kg) is at his current weight. Would he go up to 174 which is 79 kg (173.8 lbs)??? Is that a cut he wants to make in 2 years because I do not see him at 86 kg, his frame simply is not that big.
With that considered, I still have Mitchell making the move to 174 here:
WT STARTER 2ND TEAM NOTED OTHERS COMING IN 2027
125 Lilledahl Wentzel Sidun
133 Ono Desmond Burnett
141 Blaze Davis Herring
149 Van Ness Pierce Perry Mangano
157 Kasak OR James Shepherd
165 Duke Sealey
174 Messenbrink Henckel
184 Welsh Cunningham
197 Barr Ellis
285 Connor Mirasola Cole Mirasola
So, I "think" we go
125 Lilledahl
133 Ono
141 Blaze
149 Van Ness
157 James
165 Duke
174 Messenbrink
184 Welsh
197 Barr
285 Connor M
With full scholarships, NIL and revenue share, I wouldn't say it SUCKS... Each of these guys are one injury from starting and need to stay sharp. I would expect all of them to get matches this year --- both in duals and open tournaments. And they each get another NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP ringAdditional note:
The game of "musical chairs" that the new rule causes REALLY SUCKS. We will literally have (7) AA level guys on the bench: Desmond, Davis, Kasak, Sealey, Henckel, Cunningham, Cole M and Pierce would be a fringe AA type guy.
Time to make the PSU Altoona or Penn College wrestling teams being D1 a reality.Additional note:
The game of "musical chairs" that the new rule causes REALLY SUCKS. We will literally have (7) AA level guys on the bench: Desmond, Davis, Kasak, Sealey, Henckel, Cunningham, Cole M and Pierce would be a fringe AA type guy.
YesHelp me understand the transition period. Are the "old rules" really the "old rules"? Will anyone choosing the 4 for 5 option by July 31 still have the ability to get 4 for 6 or even 4 for 7 with future injury redshirts like the "old rules" used to allow?
For example: If Connor Mirasola was injured in December of last year and could not compete again in 2025-26 season... can Penn State request a medial redshirt (he already took a regular redshirt) by July 31? If so he becomes a 4 for 6 "old rules" wrestler with 4 more years of eligibility.
Nobody is "just given" a weight.I won't doubt Kasak till he gets beat out,I dont think they had a wrestle off last yr just gave PJ the weight!
I agree. There were only 10 true freshmen wrestlers in this past NCAAs (8 AAs). There were 41 redshirt freshman (8 AAs) --- I would expect maybe half of those would have made the NCAAs as true freshman. Going forward maybe 30 true freshman make the tournament each year. Between injuries and expanded roster competition and IVY rules maybe 10-15 make their 5th tournament.I will be completely amazed if more than a hand full of kids ever wrestle 5 years in college. Too much of a grind. And most that do wrestle the 5 post seasons will most likely not be at full capacity for all 5 years. I'm not a betting man but if i was i would bet Cael continues to recruit kids for the 4 year post season and have a year of training unless they are truly special. But either way there are waaaaaaay to many injuries that occur in a 4 year period let alone 5
He could use his regular RS for the 27-28 year and train for the Olympics. PJ will go the 5 for 5 routeSo if some kids, like duke, decide to stay in old system can he not get a regular red shirt and an olympic red shirt?
Wasnt sure if they decide old way if all the redshirts still available or just one. Of course kids like pj blaze ect.. would have to be good with that. That would definitely free up weights to fit most in.He could use his regular RS for the 27-28 year and train for the Olympics. PJ will go the 5 for 5 route
Would just be one. No more Olympic RS . You would just get 1 regular RS if you decided to do 4/5Wasnt sure if they decide old way if all the redshirts still available or just one. Of course kids like pj blaze ect.. would have to be good with that. That would definitely free up weights to fit most in.
But how many "injury" redshirts? If none, that is hardly the "old rules"...Would just be one. No more Olympic RS . You would just get 1 regular RS if you decided to do 4/5
Correct on both countsBut how many "injury" redshirts? If none, that is hardly the "old rules"...