He has four NCAA wins to Pope's three since Cal left Kentucky. Even sucky Cal > Pope at present.
He has four NCAA wins to Pope's three since Cal left Kentucky. Even sucky Cal > Pope at present.
FreakIt has nothing to do with his religion, lol. And we disagree on the premise that landing the literal last player available just because everyone else got their players and it happened to work out somehow constitutes a great recruiting cycle. There are many other reasons as well.
Terrible logic. Mark Pope had zero NCAA wins in his first 9 seasons as a D1 head coach. What about Cal in his first 9 seasons? Calipari was at UMass, which was one of the worst programs in America when he arrived, and he yet he had ELEVEN NCAA wins by year eight at UMass.Cal won 1 damn game in his last 4 years . He was pathetic. You can nutt dangle him all you want but it’s just loser on loser love . Pope started winning ncaa games again that’s the bottom line
That’s stupid . You don’t want to consider Cal quit on us and his last 4 year record shows it . Even negotiating a contract seconds after going on tv with Mitch stating he’s staying . He’s a pos . You can nutt dangle him I never willTerrible logic. Mark Pope had zero NCAA wins in his first 9 seasons as a D1 head coach. Calipari was at UMass, which was one of the worst programs in America when he arrived, and he yet he had ELEVEN NCAA wins by year eight at UMass.
There's no way you make the argument that UMass had any advantages that BYU didn't.
No matter how you slice it, Calipari comes out better than Mark Pope, even since Pope came to UK. Again, Cal has more NCAA wins in that span. Even Kryptonite Era Calipari is better than Mark Pope.
There’s probably 200 D1 coaches better than Pope.Terrible logic. Mark Pope had zero NCAA wins in his first 9 seasons as a D1 head coach. What about Cal in his first 9 seasons? Calipari was at UMass, which was one of the worst programs in America when he arrived, and he yet he had ELEVEN NCAA wins by year eight at UMass.
There's no way you make the argument that UMass had any advantages that BYU didn't.
No matter how you slice it, Calipari comes out better than Mark Pope, even since Pope came to UK. Again, Cal has more NCAA wins in that span. Even Kryptonite Era Calipari is better than Mark Pope.
So you enjoyed the last 4 tourneys of Cal better than the first 2 of Pope . We get it .Terrible logic. Mark Pope had zero NCAA wins in his first 9 seasons as a D1 head coach. What about Cal in his first 9 seasons? Calipari was at UMass, which was one of the worst programs in America when he arrived, and he yet he had ELEVEN NCAA wins by year eight at UMass.
There's no way you make the argument that UMass had any advantages that BYU didn't.
No matter how you slice it, Calipari comes out better than Mark Pope, even since Pope came to UK. Again, Cal has more NCAA wins in that span. Even Kryptonite Era Calipari is better than Mark Pope.
Look at his old posts. He detested Cal, wouldn’t stop. He’s using Cal to irritate UK fans because he can’t relate to Pope. It’s Pitino or nothing with that nut job. I’m out. Same garbage, different day.So you enjoyed the last 4 tourneys of Cal better than the first 2 of Pope . We get it .
That's not the argument. Two different arguments. In fact, I think Cal phoned it in his last four years, and it's a shame because he should have finished out here but he got fat and lazy.So you enjoyed the last 4 tourneys of Cal better than the first 2 of Pope . We get it .
Yes he won games in the tourney when Cal couldn’t .That's not the argument. Two different arguments. In fact, I think Cal phoned it in his last four years, and it's a shame because he should have finished out here but he got fat and lazy.
You were comparing Pope to Calipari. There has never been a time in Cal's career where he was inferior to Mark Pope. In fact, can you name one thing that Mark Pope does better than Calipari from a coaching perspective even right now? I'm sure there's something.
Really?Yes he won games in the tourney when Cal couldn’t .
Really you can kiss hog *** all you want I’m not into them . Cal won 1 damn game in 4 years here and Pope won 3Really?
Pope has three tourney wins in the last two years.
Calipari has four in the same time span.
"Boomers" sure is being used alot here lately in a derogatory way. I mean you have post after post after post saying it. Poorly raised, wimpy. snot-nosed punks disrespecting their elders while hiding behind a curtain is why I rarely come here anymore.
If I was Noah I would sue for that comparisonHonestly he KSR story about his player comps is kinda crazy and a bad look.
Wilkins =SGA
McBride = Randle
Noah = O. Simmons
Unfair to those kids to be compared to absolute legends.
Terrible logic. Mark Pope had zero NCAA wins in his first 9 seasons as a D1 head coach. What about Cal in his first 9 seasons? Calipari was at UMass, which was one of the worst programs in America when he arrived, and he yet he had ELEVEN NCAA wins by year eight at UMass.
There's no way you make the argument that UMass had any advantages that BYU didn't.
No matter how you slice it, Calipari comes out better than Mark Pope, even since Pope came to UK. Again, Cal has more NCAA wins in that span. Even Kryptonite Era Calipari is better than Mark Pope.
Agreed. Being compared to the guy who lead UK to a natty and a runner up is far to much pressure.If I was Noah I would sue for that comparison
I hope Pope beats Cal by 30. I hope Pope proves the doubters wrong.Cal didn't come out better this year on his home court, and had much more talent then Kentucky. Pope and Kentucky will kick Cals a.ss again this year.
Kentucky will have a big year, and Pope will be talked about differently at the end. That's my story, and I'm fkn sticking to it, until proven other wise. We probably won't remember this s.hit anyway.
Pretty easy to do when you take the whole roster and leave the cupboard completely bareHe has four NCAA wins to Pope's three since Cal left Kentucky. Even sucky Cal > Pope at present.
Why didn't Pope take Saunders and some of his other best players? After all, that last BYU team was a 6 seed. You'd think they'd want to come with him the way Cal's guys did.Pretty easy to do when you take the whole roster and leave the cupboard completely bare
That's not the argument. Two different arguments. In fact, I think Cal phoned it in his last four years, and it's a shame because he should have finished out here but he got fat and lazy.
You were comparing Pope to Calipari. There has never been a time in Cal's career where he was inferior to Mark Pope. In fact, can you name one thing that Mark Pope does better than Calipari from a coaching perspective even right now? I'm sure there's something Son of Sh#t
Maybe....they....liked.....BYU....Why didn't Pope take Saunders and some of his other best players? After all, that last BYU team was a 6 seed. You'd think they'd want to come with him the way Cal's guys did.