So the police that opened the door, should have then opened fire? JFC you are a fаggot clownWell, I believe the police should’ve opened fire on the first ones through the door.
So yes, we have a difference of opinion on the event.
So the police that opened the door, should have then opened fire? JFC you are a fаggot clownWell, I believe the police should’ve opened fire on the first ones through the door.
So yes, we have a difference of opinion on the event.
Right. Not apples to apples.most of the George Floyd protester intentions were to use his death as an excuse to destroy property and steal property. most people are to lacking and diligence to look into the facts. Floyd was given 4 minutes to get out of the car with no physical actions by the police. (check out the video) after 4 minutes of trying to persuade him the police use Force to pull him out and police negligence caused his death. he was wrongly convicted of murder partly because of perjury by an assistant police chief who claimed that the technique used by Chauvin was not authorized by the police force. in fact there is a video from around 2012 where this particular police officer instructed other officers in the use of the technique that she denied was authorized.
the protesters were trying to overturn what they thought was a fraudulent election. Trump never proved that so they were just pawns in a bigger game.
Talk about low-IQSo the police that opened the door, should have then opened fire? JFC you are a fаggot clown
It’s amazing you can say that last section and yet still support the one using the pawns as fervently as you domost of the George Floyd protester intentions were to use his death as an excuse to destroy property and steal property. most people are to lacking and diligence to look into the facts. Floyd was given 4 minutes to get out of the car with no physical actions by the police. (check out the video) after 4 minutes of trying to persuade him the police use Force to pull him out and police negligence caused his death. he was wrongly convicted of murder partly because of perjury by an assistant police chief who claimed that the technique used by Chauvin was not authorized by the police force. in fact there is a video from around 2012 where this particular police officer instructed other officers in the use of the technique that she denied was authorized.
the protesters were trying to overturn what they thought was a fraudulent election. Trump never proved that so they were just pawns in a bigger game.
My support is not fervent. Trump is the least worst alternative to the lunatics on the left. Among other things, I disagree with the Iran War. Also, the disagreement with the Italian prime Minister is childish and silly.It’s amazing you can say that last section and yet still support the one using the pawns as fervently as you do
Funny that you call Maga gullible when your friends supported a corpse for president and also supported somebody as dumb as Kamala Harris. Harris was so stupid that she had to be protected from sit-down interviews. Total joke.Why is MAGA so gullible? Because Trump loves the poorly educated. People were undercharged........not overcharged. Only a cultist would believe that stupid shite
Funny that you call Maga gullible when your friends supported a corpse for president and also supported somebody as dumb as Kamala Harris. Harris was so stupid that she had to be protected from sit-down interviews. Total joke.
He's a learned man of wide life experiences. He is a consumer of a far ranging selection of media, and quite balanced.It’s cute what gets Northern interested these days. What a clown.
If gullible morons like you didn't support Trump then I wouldn't have voted for either one.............stop being a gullible moron
"They made me do it!"
- Probably fsujreed
I had no choice"They made me do it!"
- Probably fsujreed
That's when the right lost the high ground? Yet you still support the man who whipped up the "simpletons & miscreants." I dare say your morals are as flexible as Trump's.I've posted extensively on this subject.
Many of the people involved on J6 are simpletons and miscreants. The worst the American right has to offer. Unsubstantiated claims led to a protest. The protest led to a riot. A riot that led to an embarrassing day in American history. Actiivity that was normally carried out by leftwingers was being carried out by those on the right. As I watched on TV, I remember thinking that the right just gave up the high ground when it came to civil unrest.
He's a dipshit simpleton. Expect nothing of him beyond phrases and feelings.That's when the right lost the high ground? Yet you still support the man who whipped up the "simpletons & miscreants." I dare say your morals are as flexible as Trump's.
That's when the right lost the high ground? Yet you still support the man who whipped up the "simpletons & miscreants." I dare say your morals are as flexible as Trump's.
Yes. To any patriotic American, J6 was a disqualifying event from ever supporting Trump again. But not so for you.That's your takeaway from my post?
Nobody takes much of anything away from your posts.That's your takeaway from my post?
No he's not. He's not a snowflake. Party of law and order and all.So the police that opened the door, should have then opened fire? JFC you are a fаggot clown
I like the cut of your jib.Well, I believe the police should’ve opened fire on the first ones through the door.
So yes, we have a difference of opinion on the event.
Whoa, whoa, whoa.I've posted extensively on this subject.
Many of the people involved on J6 are simpletons and miscreants. The worst the American right has to offer. Unsubstantiated claims led to a protest. The protest led to a riot. A riot that led to an embarrassing day in American history. Actiivity that was normally carried out by leftwingers was being carried out by those on the right. As I watched on TV, I remember thinking that the right just gave up the high ground when it came to civil unrest.
I supported a full accounting. I supported charging all violations of the law.
What I don't support is prosecutorial and judiciary zeal, undoubtedly motivated by politics. I have concerns about custody determinations, sentencing recommendations and sentencing.
I opposed the subsequent sweeping pardons. Each case should have been evaluated independently. Commutations in select cases if appropriate.
I bet you don't consider Kyle Rittenhouse a murderer, do you?glad you have outed yourself as supporting murder.
One of the super dumb comments. Someone pointed a gun at him and another person attempted to grab his gun. It was obvious self-defense.I bet you don't consider Kyle Rittenhouse a murderer, do you?
Yes, because no Capital Police were threatened/attacked/beaten with weapons, per sprayed, physically attacked....One of the super dumb comments. Someone pointed a gun at him and another person attempted to grab his gun. It was obvious self-defense.
Super dumb again. No Capitol Police officer was threatened with a gun. You are a case study of the stupid, delusional and ignorant Left.Yes, because no Capital Police were threatened/attacked/beaten with weapons, per sprayed, physically attacked....
Do improvised clubs, spear-tipped flagpoles, fire extinguishers, baseball bats, hockey sticks, crutches, bear spray and tasers count as weapons? What about the police batons and riot shields they took from the officers? Did the firearms that some of the protestors brought with them onto the grounds pose a threat, even though they weren't used?Super dumb again. No Capitol Police officer was threatened with a gun. You are a case study of the stupid, delusional and ignorant Left.
No ICE agents were threatened with a gun by Alex Pereti, were they murders?Super dumb again. No Capitol Police officer was threatened with a gun. You are a case study of the stupid, delusional and ignorant Left.
the original post that I was responding to refered to shooting the first people through the door. no mention of any assault on any police officers or any physical threats. he said he would be happy for the first people through the door to be shot. I realize this is a very complex matter for lefties but someone breaking through a door is not the same as a police officer being struck with a flagpole or a police officer being threatened with a gun. Leftie ignorance and the inability to reason on display again.Do improvised clubs, spear-tipped flagpoles, fire extinguishers, baseball bats, hockey sticks, crutches, bear spray and tasers count as weapons? What about the police batons and riot shields they took from the officers? Did the firearms that some of the protestors brought with them onto the grounds pose a threat, even though they weren't used?