News today

Uncoach

All-American
Dec 8, 2011
6,743
9,719
113
Humorless liberal! You do know America is modeled after Republican Rome? I’m sure you don’t. From the political structure to architecture America aspired to be Rome and became Rome. And yes, it happened 70-80 years ago.

Enjoy it.
70-80 years ago? That coincides with the birth of Trump. Let’s bow down and worship the American messiah!

/s
 

tjfleck6

All-American
Apr 19, 2008
6,202
7,546
113
If you actually did know, you would realize that Rome was never a democracy, it was a Kingdom ruled by Kings, then an Oligarchy ruled by wealthy families, then an Empire ruled by emperors.
Thank God Trump does not persecute his political opponents. You are oblivious to reality.
My God you are dumb. Democracy? Rome? I assume you don’t know that the USA is not a Democracy.

Athens proved that Democracy is awful because it allows the idiot masses like you and your fellow Democrats to rule.

I’m sure the reference to Cinncinatus went way over your head. Great man.

 

AzIllini

Senior
Apr 26, 2003
2,424
944
78
By the time of Caesar the Roman Republic was fatally flawed, like someone in California decided what a fair election was. This is what Caesar faced when he decided to cross the Rubicon, not that he wasn't a part of this system, but because he was going to be jailed and murdered if he didn't.


In the Roman Republic, the wealthy had substantially more political influence and, in many cases, more effective voting power than ordinary citizens. The system was designed to give greater weight to wealth and status.

How voting worked:​

Roman citizens were assigned to voting groups based largely on property and wealth. One important assembly was the Centuriate Assembly (Comitia Centuriata).

Citizens were divided into "centuries" (voting units), but these were not equal-sized groups. Wealthier citizens were placed into centuries that contained fewer people.

As a result:
  • A rich citizen's vote effectively carried more weight.
  • The wealthiest classes controlled a disproportionately large number of centuries.
  • Voting was conducted by century, not by counting individual ballots across the entire population.

The biggest advantage: voting order​

The centuries voted in a fixed order:
  1. The richest centuries voted first.
  2. Then the next wealthiest.
  3. Poorer citizens voted last.
Because voting stopped once a majority of centuries had been reached, the wealthiest groups could often decide the outcome before many poorer citizens even voted.

The Senate​

The Roman Senate was not elected directly by the people. Membership generally came from:
  • Former magistrates
  • Members of aristocratic families
  • Wealthy political elites
So ordinary citizens had little direct influence over Senate membership.

How was wealth determined?​

Roman officials called censors periodically conducted a census. They recorded:
  • Land ownership
  • Livestock
  • Slaves
  • Other property and assets
Based on the value of a citizen's property, he was assigned to a social and voting class. The wealthiest class included the equites (knights) and the senatorial elite, while poorer citizens were placed in lower classes.
 

BigWill

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
53,858
32,488
113
Maybe not. But it sure seems like most people aren’t even willing to have a conversation about this topic. This entire conversation started because someone on here blamed beef prices on Biden. The truth is much more complicated, but it’s easy to just blame Biden and call people a squish when they question the status quo.

The Colorado River provides water for an area that raises just as many cattle as the state of Texas. With a shrinking national cattle herd, it’s about time people start talking about it.
Blame squish...

Woe is me.....

I can't even vote for no one and not get blamed...
 

BigWill

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
53,858
32,488
113
This is absolutely not my solution. I wouldn’t tell anyone to invest in farming in the SW. I believe you and others were talking about how you should buy farmland on the Colorado River because it’s such a steal. I think the exact opposite. I think we need to relocate people and farming communities to places that actually have water. You guys seem to think more people and more farms, and desalinated water from the ocean a few hundred miles away are the answer.
Better water conservation, better use of technology, better distribution, better knowledge ...not just some bogus degrees.
 

BigWill

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
53,858
32,488
113
This is absolutely not my solution. I wouldn’t tell anyone to invest in farming in the SW. I believe you and others were talking about how you should buy farmland on the Colorado River because it’s such a steal. I think the exact opposite. I think we need to relocate people and farming communities to places that actually have water. You guys seem to think more people and more farms, and desalinated water from the ocean a few hundred miles away are the answer.
Again you either can read or can't retain what you should read and heed.

Desalination has turned one ENTIRE Middle East COUNTRY from a desert to where they sell water to other Countries.

Multi-billionaires are buying up land in the West. $ 200,000,000 million for ONE ranch.
1,000,000 Million acres bought in New Mexico, ONE purchase.

Gates buying land.

Chi-na buying land all over the west.
 

BigWill

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
53,858
32,488
113
Maybe not. But it sure seems like most people aren’t even willing to have a conversation about this topic. This entire conversation started because someone on here blamed beef prices on Biden. The truth is much more complicated, but it’s easy to just blame Biden and call people a squish when they question the status quo.

The Colorado River provides water for an area that raises just as many cattle as the state of Texas. With a shrinking national cattle herd, it’s about time people start talking about it.
Blame on Biden.....Can we blame everything bad happening on old Joey ? Obviously Not, but Obumma/Dr Jill/ Mike O/Hunter/Auto pen....yes.

The fact is if "The Buck Stops Here", Harry Truman. Then Biden IS responsible for the reduction of the Cattle herd in the USA. Plus you ADD in inflation in Gas/Diesel pricing you have beef up. Facts are that increasing cattle herds is something nature won't let you take less than 3 YEARS Minimum.
 

BigWill

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
53,858
32,488
113
I don’t care about posts from Table Salt and arctic weather, you got me there.

I had a meeting with a client yesterday just outside Greeley, CO. 4th generation farmers. They are reducing their cattle herd 50% this year. They didn’t talk about regulation killing them. They talked about how they are very worried about having their water cutoff in July or August. I bet they would be amazed to hear Republicans think they are greedy and taking too much water.

I care about those stories much more than the death jab and yak farming in Alaska. You and I are very different, and I’m OK with that.
Did you tell your clients that your favorite golf course uses millions of gallons to keep the grass green so you can easily spot your small white ball or huge lakes to catch a poorly struck ball for resale ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ILisBest

BigWill

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
53,858
32,488
113
Rome was the center of civilization and a very wealthy empire. That isn’t a cult, dippy. That’s what all Americans should want. The best. The very best. Bigly. If you were a baseball umpire you would be worse than Angel Hernandez calling balls and strikes.
Did Rome have a wall ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bung23

BigWill

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
53,858
32,488
113
My God you are dumb. Democracy? Rome? I assume you don’t know that the USA is not a Democracy.

Athens proved that Democracy is awful because it allows the idiot masses like you and your fellow Democrats to rule.

I’m sure the reference to Cinncinatus went way over your head. Great man.

Mad Dog is a graduate of Cinn !
 

rillaman

Heisman
May 10, 2009
18,476
11,694
113
Again you either can read or can't retain what you should read and heed.

Desalination has turned one ENTIRE Middle East COUNTRY from a desert to where they sell water to other Countries.

Multi-billionaires are buying up land in the West. $ 200,000,000 million for ONE ranch.
1,000,000 Million acres bought in New Mexico, ONE purchase.

Gates buying land.

Chi-na buying land all over the west.

Gates wants to lower the population of earth, he’s not going to increase the cattle herds. China would love to reduce our food supply. These are not good things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bung23

rillaman

Heisman
May 10, 2009
18,476
11,694
113
Did you tell your clients that your favorite golf course uses millions of gallons to keep the grass green so you can easily spot your small white ball or huge lakes to catch a poorly struck ball for resale ?

I love that you guys think I’m the problem because I play golf 5 times a year. The far right is very similar to the far left.
 

rillaman

Heisman
May 10, 2009
18,476
11,694
113
Better water conservation, better use of technology, better distribution, better knowledge ...not just some bogus degrees.

We have used all of those things. TJ is right, Arizona consumes less water than it used to. Unfortunately, that consumption is still more than the Earth provides to that part of the country. All the conservation efforts and technology have still led to very low water levels in key bodies of water.
 

stoneaxe27

All-American
Sep 22, 2006
5,662
6,657
113
By the time of Caesar the Roman Republic was fatally flawed, like someone in California decided what a fair election was. This is what Caesar faced when he decided to cross the Rubicon, not that he wasn't a part of this system, but because he was going to be jailed and murdered if he didn't.


In the Roman Republic, the wealthy had substantially more political influence and, in many cases, more effective voting power than ordinary citizens. The system was designed to give greater weight to wealth and status.

How voting worked:​

Roman citizens were assigned to voting groups based largely on property and wealth. One important assembly was the Centuriate Assembly (Comitia Centuriata).

Citizens were divided into "centuries" (voting units), but these were not equal-sized groups. Wealthier citizens were placed into centuries that contained fewer people.

As a result:
  • A rich citizen's vote effectively carried more weight.
  • The wealthiest classes controlled a disproportionately large number of centuries.
  • Voting was conducted by century, not by counting individual ballots across the entire population.

The biggest advantage: voting order​

The centuries voted in a fixed order:
  1. The richest centuries voted first.
  2. Then the next wealthiest.
  3. Poorer citizens voted last.
Because voting stopped once a majority of centuries had been reached, the wealthiest groups could often decide the outcome before many poorer citizens even voted.

The Senate​

The Roman Senate was not elected directly by the people. Membership generally came from:
  • Former magistrates
  • Members of aristocratic families
  • Wealthy political elites
So ordinary citizens had little direct influence over Senate membership.

How was wealth determined?​

Roman officials called censors periodically conducted a census. They recorded:
  • Land ownership
  • Livestock
  • Slaves
  • Other property and assets
Based on the value of a citizen's property, he was assigned to a social and voting class. The wealthiest class included the equites (knights) and the senatorial elite, while poorer citizens were placed in lower classes.
Good summary. The citizens did not vote for policy makers or heads of state, only for magistrates. Plus an enormous number of people were slaves with no rights. I can see why TJ and some here are envious ;) and TJ believes the US was modeled on Rome.🤡
 

BigWill

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
53,858
32,488
113
We have used all of those things. TJ is right, Arizona consumes less water than it used to. Unfortunately, that consumption is still more than the Earth provides to that part of the country. All the conservation efforts and technology have still led to very low water levels in key bodies of water.
Of course we all know TJ is correct, he is a thinking poster.

Whereas others that can't talk of or understand the science of water management, bemoan that "all the conservation efforts and tech " are now useless and we are doomed as a meat eating Country because it didn't rain today while golfing !
 
  • Like
Reactions: tjfleck6

AzIllini

Senior
Apr 26, 2003
2,424
944
78
We have used all of those things. TJ is right, Arizona consumes less water than it used to. Unfortunately, that consumption is still more than the Earth provides to that part of the country. All the conservation efforts and technology have still led to very low water levels in key bodies of water.
Look West young man to the Imperial Valley. 3+million acre feet every year and their water rights are senior to most of Colorado.

If the drought gets 50% worse, they still will use 3+million acre feet. And the water is cheap so they probably will make more money growing alfalfa if competition goes out of business elsewhere.
 

Uncoach

All-American
Dec 8, 2011
6,743
9,719
113
This is supposed to be funny, but it’s true. The only successful people allowed are political hacks and moneyed folks of the Democrat persuasion. You have to be wearing a straight jacket to vote for these pinkos right now.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: JeffT819

AzIllini

Senior
Apr 26, 2003
2,424
944
78
Thinking of the bonehead plot to attack the UFC event:

Since you all are into history. John Wilkes Booth was a nationally known actor so it was not unusual for him to be at a play. He was part of a bigger plot to kill Lincoln, VP Johnson, and Secy of State Seward that night. Wilkes was successful, Seward survived, and the guy assigned to Johnson lost his nerve. Ulysses S Grant also was supposed to be at the play that night and was going to be targeted but his plans changed and he did not attend. It was a plot to throw the Union into disarray -- but by this point Lee had surrendered and the South's capital Richmond was in Union hands, so boneheaded.

The other interesting tidbit is an armed policeman was assigned to stand guard over the entrance to the theater box Lincoln was in. He left his post, reasons vary but one theory was so he could go to a bar next door and get a drink. When Booth showed up the way to Lincoln was wide open. The policeman was investigated but never punished and stayed on the police force.
 

rillaman

Heisman
May 10, 2009
18,476
11,694
113
Look West young man to the Imperial Valley. 3+million acre feet every year and their water rights are senior to most of Colorado.

If the drought gets 50% worse, they still will use 3+million acre feet. And the water is cheap so they probably will make more money growing alfalfa if competition goes out of business elsewhere.

The Imperial Valley has a population of less than 200k ("it's the f'n desert"), and is one of the most productive agricultural regions in the United States. We need that part of the country to be productive to feed our country.

A growing Phoenix population (and the water needed to support it) will result in less water for more productive areas. I realize it's stupid, and will only result in higher prices at the grocery store if we squeeze out ranchers and farmers.
 

AzIllini

Senior
Apr 26, 2003
2,424
944
78
The Imperial Valley has a population of less than 200k ("it's the f'n desert"), and is one of the most productive agricultural regions in the United States. We need that part of the country to be productive to feed our country.

A growing Phoenix population (and the water needed to support it) will result in less water for more productive areas. I realize it's stupid, and will only result in higher prices at the grocery store if we squeeze out ranchers and farmers.
I think I prefer people to subsidized water rates for marginal farmers and ranchers in Colorado living off the taxpayer's dime. Why not start charging everyone competitive rates for the water? People, cows, pigs, alfalfa. It is the only fair way. If they charged competitive prices how much alfalfa would the Imperial Valley export to China?
 

rillaman

Heisman
May 10, 2009
18,476
11,694
113
I think I prefer people to subsidized water rates for marginal farmers and ranchers in Colorado living off the taxpayer's dime. Why not start charging everyone competitive rates for the water? People, cows, pigs, alfalfa. It is the only fair way. If they charged competitive prices how much alfalfa would the Imperial Valley export to China?

Great plan if you want to end up eating lab made fake meat. Farming/ranching is not an easy way of life, so we have to incentivize people to do it. If we are going to incentivize any industry, it should probably be the one putting food on our table.

Without the help of other states, Arizona is not a livable place for 8-10 million people. The land does not provide the necessary water for that many people. I guess you guys just want farmers to be removed from the equation so that it does provide enough water for that area. I believe that is a very bad idea.
 
Last edited: