He said those things years ago because he wanted to get elected in a super-liberal Austin state House district. Every political candidate in the country adjusts their rhetoric to their audience.
The only prominent Democrat who has ever really fought hard for full sports participation is Maine's governor Janet Mills, and we all just saw what her state thinks of her today. Lots of Democrats formally oppose allowing transgender participation in sports (or at least letting states ban it if they want), including Joe Biden and Gavin Newsom, and most of the rest just kinda shrug it off, hoping the issue will go away. I think it is almost universally known among Democrats that this is a loser issue, which is why you see Talarico distancing himself from his former comments and none of the Democratic candidates in states like NC, OH, AK, etc., ever mentioning this.
So he has no basic beliefs. It's just a desire to attain power and status. I'm with you on the Republicans demeaning themselves before Dear Leader but they're not far off on policy and certainly haven't renounced cultural stances they took just a couple of years ago.
Newsome changed his mind to have a national appeal. He was once for it and most Dems, when asked to vote to limit transwomen in women's sports, don't support it. You're simply inaccurate on that one. Even Ossoff, a reasonable Dem, voted against banning transwomen from women's or girls sports. Almost all Dems did and will continue to do so. Only a minority of Dems take the reasonable position that biological men and boys shouldn't compete against women and girls.
Good heavens…..I didn’t realize it until this very post. I need a nap.
I don't like his opponent and I could post more woke nonsense spouted by Tal on X and in public that goes beyond a sentence of two. And the fact that he believed he must say God is non-binary and whiteness is a virus shows the shallowness of modern progressivism, Austin style, that relies on absurd pieties as the basis of public policy. Perhaps he's changed. He did perhaps call Allred a mediocre black man.
Hold up- do you think God is a man or woman?...like God actually identifies as a gender like humans?
uscatholic.org
A. I didn't ask you.
"A transwoman can't have a baby." It's literally impossible in 2026. Maybe one day there will be full uterus transplants, but it hasn't happened yet.
It is illegal federally. Full stop.
The bible is very specific on homosexuality and trans.
Its part of the trans issue you dumb @$$. Mainstream democrats can't call it out just like they won't publicly go on the record and say "trans women can't have babies" or "men can't have babies".
You get to be called sane.
There are mainstream democrats who won't publicly go on the record and say it which is absurd.
Whatev. God isn't defined by constructs invented by gender theorists a few minutes ago. Saying he's non-binary is idiotic. (Jesus was male, btw). The article you posted confirms what I wrote at least for Catholics. FYI, non-binary is a gender category and one that's based purely on self-identification. God isn't non-binary, He isn't agender, He isn't gender fluid, He isn't trans or any of the other genders under the umbrella term non-binary. He's God.Hold up- do you think God is a man or woman?...like God actually identifies as a gender like humans?
If so, this is interesting since I learned God is a divine spiritual entity and not simply a man or woman.
Someone earlier seemed to also view God as a gendered being. It'd be interesting to hear what religion(s) taught this.
Does God have a gender?
God is beyond gender—but when we talk about God, It matters what metaphors, analogies, and symbols we use.
