Caitlin's late logo three delivers win for Fever

[eyesofhawk]

You should take your advice and read better. You didn’t answer the question that was asked.

Side note, please cease and desist the usage of the word ‘bomb’ to describe a long shot. It has a negative connotation and may cause kids to stay away from the game.

He didn't read well enough to ask to right question.

I'm sure you knew that, though

 

[Cidhawkeye]

He didn't read well enough to ask to right question.

I'm sure you knew that, though

They asked a question, you gave an answer to some other question. Once again you are factually inaccurate. Back to being a liar again. You just can’t help yourself.

I am glad you didn’t use bomb in your post though, it is so bad for the game.

 

[eyesofhawk]

They asked a question, you gave an answer to some other question. Once again you are factually inaccurate. Back to being a liar again. You just can’t help yourself.

I am glad you didn’t use bomb in your post though, it is so bad for the game.

I answered the question exactly how I wanted to because his question didn't have a thing to do with what I was already talking about.

Comprehend more.

And get a life

 

[oldhawk56]

Yes, I'm aware of the dynamic on the court.

But that doesn't have anything to do calling a 3 pointer, a "long 3 pointer". The game is over. No additional benefit beyond 3 points will be received from the play

You may need medical intervention.

 

[Cidhawkeye]

I answered the question exactly how I wanted to because his question didn't have a thing to do with what I was already talking about.

Comprehend more.

And get a life

I am living my best life, thank you for the faux concern.

I chuckle at your approach of ignoring the question and just throwing out your drivel. Good to see that you are equally inaccurate in that case as well. Nice work, liar.

Another post where you didn't use bomb when referring to long basketball shots, you are growing the game.

 

[eyesofhawk]

I am living my best life, thank you for the faux concern.

I chuckle at your approach of ignoring the question and just throwing out your drivel. Good to see that you are equally inaccurate in that case as well. Nice work, liar.

Another post where you didn't use bomb when referring to long basketball shots, you are growing the game.

What about the drivel he imposed into the discussion?

AGAIN, he responded to MY post, with something completely unrelated.

My response was completely in line with what the nature of the discussion had already been.

Guess you still haven't read that part well enough.

How many days do you wanted to do this for this time?

 

[Cidhawkeye]

What about the drivel he imposed into the discussion?

AGAIN, he responded to MY post, with something completely unrelated.

My response was completely in line with what the nature of the discussion had already been.

Guess you still haven't read that part well enough.

How many days do you wanted to do this for this time?

Read better, I didn’t mention anyone’s drivel other than yours.

Your mindset makes me chuckle
‘I don’t like the question so I will just throw some irrelevant drivel out there’

The good part is I have facts and accuracy on my side so I can keep going and not worry about needing to spin anything.
You on the other hand have been a documented liar so you need to try and play word games. Pro tip, you aren’t very good at it.

 

[eyesofhawk]

Read better, I didn’t mention anyone’s drivel other than yours.

Your mindset makes me chuckle
‘I don’t like the question so I will just throw some irrelevant drivel out there’

The good part is I have facts and accuracy on my side so I can keep going and not worry about needing to spin anything.
You on the other hand have been a documented liar so you need to try and play word games. Pro tip, you aren’t very good at it.

No. If anything, you are the liar.

If you're discussing the weather forecast, and someone attaches one of your posts, and "responds" to it by asking you how many sisters you have, might you not necesssrily feel obligated to answer that question?

I had been talking about not liking the glorification of shot distance, and the use of the term, "logo 3".

Duke butted in by asking me to name players that have been making logo 3's, which clearly had nothing to do with what I was talking about.

Again, my response to Duke, in turn, was completely consistent with the nature of the particular discussion that had already been established.

I will not be explaining this to you again. You can't possibly be this dumb

 

[Cidhawkeye]

No. If anything, you are the liar.

If you're discussing the weather forecast, and someone attaches one of your posts, and "responds" to it by asking you how many sisters you have, might you not necesssrily feel obligated to answer that question?

I had been talking about not liking the glorification of shot distance, and the use of the term, "logo 3".

Duke butted in by asking me to name players that have been making logo 3's, which clearly had nothing to do with what I was talking about.

Again, my response to Duke, in turn, was completely consistent with the nature of the particular discussion that had already been established.

I will not be explaining this to you again. You can't possibly be this dumb

Read better, that is not what Duke asked.
I have now determined you suck at analogies as well.
You are finding new things to suck at.
Still haven’t decided on the PB/CC debate yet? Even though you typed it twice.
Didn’t like a question so just made up another answer.
Bad at analogies and a liar.
Pretty solid hat trick you got going.

I will say your spelling is pretty solid so you have that going for you. If you could be accurate and not lie you could come up with your first valid post. I promise I will celebrate it when you do. Keep trying. It’s about time for your standard responses so start typing.

 

[eyesofhawk]

Read better, that is not what Duke asked.
I have now determined you suck at analogies as well.
You are finding new things to suck at.
Still haven’t decided on the PB/CC debate yet? Even though you typed it twice.
Didn’t like a question so just made up another answer.
Bad at analogies and a liar.
Pretty solid hat trick you got going.

I will say your spelling is pretty solid so you have that going for you. If you could be accurate and not lie you could come up with your first valid post. I promise I will celebrate it when you do. Keep trying. It’s about time for your standard responses so start typing.

That's exactly what Duke asked me.

Post #21. "How many can even shoot from there, let alone make it?" "Name anyone else in women's basketball that (has been hitting logo 3's)."

Additionally, you don't seem to understand that I actually did answer Duke's question, by replying that, "many, many players have hit 3 pointers". Because a logo 3 and a common 3 are the same thing. That's the whole point

 

[Cidhawkeye]

That's exactly what Duke asked me.

Post #21. "How many can even shoot from there, let alone make it?" "Name anyone else in women's basketball that (has been hitting logo 3's)."

Additionally, you don't seem to understand that I actually did answer Duke's question, by replying that, "many, many players have hit 3 pointers". Because a logo 3 and a common 3 are the same thing. That's the whole point

You need to really, really work on your honesty.

"Maybe it should be. And how many people can even shoot from there, let alone make it?"

You added the (has been hitting logo 3's)

It is entertaining to see you attempt to craft your narrative, changing the questions to fit your answer, dodging accountability, telling lies. In a battle of wits you truly are the unarmed. Keep it up. Can you at least get a little better? This is getting easier each time you try.

 

[eyesofhawk]

You need to really, really work on your honesty.

"Maybe it should be. And how many people can even shoot from there, let alone make it?"

You added the (has been hitting logo 3's)

It is entertaining to see you attempt to craft your narrative, changing the questions to fit your answer, dodging accountability, telling lies. In a battle of wits you truly are the unarmed. Keep it up. Can you at least get a little better? This is getting easier each time you try.

You really, really can't read worth a ****. And I'm beginning to think it's on purpose. You can't possibly be this dumb.

The 2nd quote you can't seem to find is in the SAME PARAGRAPH (as it is a one paragraph post) as the first quote.

The "added" part, is called a paraphrase. And it was done so completely legitimately.

GET A LIFE

 

[Natchrlman2]

JFC……it’s the GOAT argument all over again with this guy….. he’s has a clinical personality disorder or something…… he takes everything 100% literally and will argue to the ends of the earth over the literal interpretation of an arbitrary term

Figure it out people the guy loves to argue…… starting to wonder if he’s my ex-wife don’t feed the troll

 

[eyesofhawk]

JFC……it’s the GOAT argument all over again with this guy….. he’s has a clinical personality disorder or something…… he takes everything 100% literally and will argue to the ends of the earth over the literal interpretation of an arbitrary term

Figure it out people the guy loves to argue…… starting to wonder if he’s my ex-wife don’t feed the troll

Assuming you're talking about me, can you read?

Read at least the 2 posts above your's. And tell me how at all I'm being the one made out to be out of line.

Cid is either a complete moron, or the one trolling, himself

 

[Natchrlman2]

Assuming you're talking about me, can you read?

Read at least the 2 posts above your's. And tell me how at all I'm being the one made out to be out of line.

Cid is either a complete moron, or the one trolling, himself

I see one common denominator in all these stupid pissing matches….. my thumb is getting arthritic scrolling through pages of your Bullsheet

 

[eyesofhawk]

I see one common denominator in all these stupid pissing matches….. my thumb is getting arthritic scrolling through pages of your Bullsheet

Read better

 

[Cidhawkeye]

Read better

Post better. Try being honest. It’s laughable that your go to is ‘read better’ yet you answer something that is not asked or typed. Oh yeah and you lie about things you actually typed. Is the lying something you think about or does it just come naturally to you? It’s funny and sad at the same time