
In fairness to your K rate conversation vs some of the top of our order:Would say that he would be an ideal leadoff candidate, but his K rate was pretty damn high (around 20%), and that’s not likely to improve when going from SoCon pitching to SEC pitching.
Not with today's analytics, maybe if you are thinking a 'prototypical' lead off batter from 20 years ago then yes.In fairness to your K rate conversation vs some of the top of our order:
Souders - 45 K's in 219 AB's = 20.5%
Ace Reese - 63 K's in 247 AB's = 25.5%
Sullivan - 62 K's in 219 AB's = 28.3 %
Frei - 47 K's in 234 AB's = 20%
Parker - 43 K's in 168 AB's = 25.6%
I dont think I'm calling that a crazy high K rate....
Exactly!17 stolen bases.
It’s pretty high given the level of competition. You know for certain it’s going to go up in the SEC.In fairness to your K rate conversation vs some of the top of our order:
Souders - 45 K's in 219 AB's = 20.5%
Ace Reese - 63 K's in 247 AB's = 25.5%
Sullivan - 62 K's in 219 AB's = 28.3 %
Frei - 47 K's in 234 AB's = 20%
Parker - 43 K's in 168 AB's = 25.6%
I dont think I'm calling that a crazy high K rate....
As i stated above, go look what he did in games against teams in the tournament. He raked....It’s pretty high given the level of competition. You know for certain it’s going to go up in the SEC.
2-3 with a walk against BamaAs i stated above, go look what he did in games against teams in the tournament. He raked....
Acting like any of those teams have something even remotely resembling SEC pitching is actually what is comical.Nitpicking out games against teams that made supers and/or Omaha is comical
No, but you discounted the K-rate by saying a bunch of our 2-6 hitters had higher K-rates.At no point have I argued for him to lead off....