Scott Forbes Happy & Thriving at UNC
The sixth-year Tar Heel head coach has led his program to two College World Series and four Super Regionals during his tenure.
Working on it, but will certainly know eventually.Will we know what increased support entails? Thanks for everyone on your keeping IC premium members informed, like always.
It’s a significant raise for the entire staff and much more nil support.Will we know what increased support entails? Thanks for everyone on your keeping IC premium members informed, like always.
Did you read what you actually wrote?? Fox only made 2 supers and one CWS in his last 6 years like the program was in the dumps. Didn’t think we had fans who thought our program was in bad shape at any point in the last 20 years. Getting to supers and the CWS is hard… ask the 8 teams who played in the CWS last year and didn’t even make supers this year. Agree with all the praise for Forbes, and I think it’s been deserved from day 1… but Fox was doing just fine and I didn’t want him to retire at all.Wasn't sold on him after his first three years, but man has he done great things the past three. Forbes stepped into a very similar position as Hubert -- strong program/brand that was still competitive but with flagging results relative to expectations (Fox only made two Supers and one CWS in his final six non-COVID years). Unlike Hubert, Forbes has been able to thrive in the new Portal/NIL era through extremely strong retention and thoughtful roster construction.
It's rare, or at least feels rare, that a legacy assistant can truly make his predecessor's program his own, build on its strengths, and address its shortcomings to meaningfully improve results. We've got a great one in Forbes; thrilled he's sticking around.
100% deserved with the way Forbes got us competing every year for a shot at omahaIt’s a significant raise for the entire staff and much more nil support.
What does much more NIL support mean? Do you mean rev share?It’s a significant raise for the entire staff and much more nil support.
Did you read what I wrote...? Saying a program is "still competitive but with flagging results relative to expectations" is not at all the same as saying the program is in the dumps.Did you read what you actually wrote?? Fox only made 2 supers and one CWS in his last 6 years like the program was in the dumps. Didn’t think we had fans who thought our program was in bad shape at any point in the last 20 years. Getting to supers and the CWS is hard… ask the 8 teams who played in the CWS last year and didn’t even make supers this year. Agree with all the praise for Forbes, and I think it’s been deserved from day 1… but Fox was doing just fine and I didn’t want him to retire at all.
There will be more money to pay players. Leave it at that.What does much more NIL support mean? Do you mean rev share?
The Davis/Forbes/NIL comparison is apples to oranges, no disrespect to you or fruit intended.Wasn't sold on him after his first three years, but man has he done great things the past three. Forbes stepped into a very similar position as Hubert -- strong program/brand that was still competitive but with flagging results relative to expectations (Fox only made two Supers and one CWS in his final six non-COVID years). Unlike Hubert, Forbes has been able to thrive in the new Portal/NIL era through extremely strong retention and thoughtful roster construction.
It's rare, or at least feels rare, that a legacy assistant can truly make his predecessor's program his own, build on its strengths, and address its shortcomings to meaningfully improve results. We've got a great one in Forbes; thrilled he's sticking around.
I hear you but it's not that simple in my mind? If it's rev share, that pot is capped so there's inherently an impact on at least one other program.There will be more money to pay players. Leave it at that.
I’m going to guess it’s a NIL commitment from a donor.I hear you but it's not that simple in my mind? If it's rev share, that pot is capped so there's inherently an impact on at least one other program.
It’s not rev share. It’s pledged money specifically for baseball playersI hear you but it's not that simple in my mind? If it's rev share, that pot is capped so there's inherently an impact on at least one other program.
Fantastic. Appreciate you!It’s not rev share. It’s pledged money specifically for baseball players
And they’ve done it on a shoestring budget. That will change after this year.They handle the portal very well. We replaced the entire starting lineup save Gallaher and didn’t miss a beat.
Oh my, an RC sighting on the boards…. Where ya been bud?!?Not surprised at this wonderful news!!!
They show replays on the scoreboard... just not enough of them.I wish they could improve the scoreboard by having video replay of plays available to the fans.
He also has some of the heaviest hitters in his corner too. The same guys that stroke huge checks for basketball and football. That helps a lot.There is also a strong subset of folks who are Diamond Heels fans first, over the other sports teams at Carolina. Forbes has done a magnificent job of making those folks feel valued and seen, not unlike Dean Smith’s original devotion to the early hoops supporters. They’re not as big in numbers as football and basketball, but they’re every bit as loyal if not more.
source, link, pleaseIt’s a significant raise for the entire staff and much more nil support.
if true … absolutely AWESOMEIt’s not rev share. It’s pledged money specifically for baseball players
let’s hopeAnd they’ve done it on a shoestring budget. That will change after this year.