Spencer Pratt - Next Los Angeles Mayor - CA Vote Counting Is Complete Sham

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
45,601
34,717
113
Trump told you and your ilk to vote on Election Day, in person, and never to vote via mail-in ballot (even though HE does). And now you're surprised that Pratt is doing poorly with respect to mail-in ballots? LOL, Trump Cultist.

The people have apparently spoken. Looks like the Repugnicant will finish in third place. Oooohhh, missed it by THAT much. :cool:

And BTW, I think this Raman gal might just take down Karen Bass in the general election. That would, in fact, be my preference.
You are off your rocker with tds bro. Its clouded your brain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hotshoe

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
45,601
34,717
113
Wut? What is flawed in my logic? Where are Pratt's votes going to come from to win the general in an overwhelmingly Democratic city? What is "not smart" about my analysis?

In a hypothetical 3 way race in the general he may have a fighting chance but even that's doubtful.

OK dude, here's your chance. You've got a shot here to prove that you actually can do some independent thinking and analysis and that you're not just a retweet posting bot.
Its fools logic that cali is heavily populated with dems. Take away the millions of illegal and fake ballots and then analyze it.
 

tigres88

All-American
Aug 7, 2022
2,642
6,925
113
Elections do not work that way. Thats why exit polls works. Percentages do not fluctuate on this level. You libs will rationalize all of it.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
45,601
34,717
113
Everything is a conspiracy when you don’t know how stuff works. You have to have an ID and proof of residence to register to vote. When you go to vote your name is checked against the registration rolls. If it seems like there might be an issue you are given a provisional ballot. Those are counted separately and checked individually. If you aren’t on the rolls then it’s discarded
Dumocrats are not smart. LMFAO!!!
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
45,601
34,717
113
The LA mayor office actually isn't that powerful. The way the area is designed was a direct response to corrupt politics in NYC (and a lesser extent Chicago) where everything was pretty centralized under the mayor. The area is broken up into tons of municipalities and departments of the government have multiple points of oversight/reporting to. The real power in the area is the 5 or so LA County Commissioners
So you are now a self anointed expert on LA and Chicago???
 

tigres88

All-American
Aug 7, 2022
2,642
6,925
113
No, I’ve just seen a video or two explaining how local government in LA works
It's wild how they refuse to do a little actual research into how local governments handle their elections. Like, they could google for 15 minutes instead of hours of rage bait x posts and understand, truthfully, how the L.A. mayoral race works.
 

GDead_Tiger

Heisman
Dec 7, 2021
14,094
36,427
113
It's wild how they refuse to do a little actual research into how local governments handle their elections. Like, they could google for 15 minutes instead of hours of rage bait x posts and understand, truthfully, how the L.A. mayoral race works.
Also me saying the LA mayor doesn’t have a ton of power isn’t partisan politics lol, it’s just a fact of how local LA government is structured
 

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
34,002
9,290
113
Elections do not work that way. Thats why exit polls works. Percentages do not fluctuate on this level. You libs will rationalize all of it.
This is jus SO GOOD. TG and JinxyPat fulminating over another GOP loss at the polls. "It's rigged, I tells 'ya!"

And this was just the :.A. mayoral primary. Just wait until November. These guys are gonna be distinctly unhappy.
 

10001110101

All-Conference
Sep 1, 2003
1,148
1,525
113
Sometimes I wonder if yall re-read the asinine sh it you post and ever have a moment of clarity enough to rethink some stuff
So are you saying that no corruption or dishonesty ever happens in elections in America?

Or corruption happens, but not in the way my post suggested?

Or election corruption happens, but not by the left. They would never.

I've admitted that I don't understand liberal thinking. I guess you'll have to educate me. Please delve deeper into what was so insane about post #270 of mine.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: yoshi121374

tigres88

All-American
Aug 7, 2022
2,642
6,925
113
So are you saying that no corruption or dishonesty ever happens in elections in America?

Or corruption happens, but not in the way my post suggested?

Or election corruption happens, but not by the left. They would never.

I've admitted that I don't understand liberal thinking. I guess you'll have to educate me. Please delve deeper into what was so insane about post #270 of mine.
What's insane about post 270 is you injected a bunch of off the wall instances of made up voter fraud into your analysis of an election that is simply proceeding as it has for 50 years.

If rereading your own post and didn't think for a second, 'hmm maybe I don't quite know how local L.A. Elections work and maybe I should actually look into it' then you might need some mental help
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
45,601
34,717
113


What’s happening in California is nothing new. It’s the same playbook they used to steal 2020.

First they send out mass mail-in ballots, to everyone, even those who didn’t request them, and dead people still on the voter rolls.

Then they harvest all these floating ballots.

Then they delay counting for day/weeks, in deep blue counties they control, so they can continue to ship all these fraudulent mail-in ballots to the tabulation center, until they have enough to steal the election.

And that’s how it’s done. Completely untraceable election fraud.

This is why the Dems don’t want voter ID. It’s why they don’t want paper ballots. It’s why they don’t want same-day elections. It’s why they don’t want to clean up voter rolls.

This is how just a few deep blue counties in swing states, are able to overturn entire state and federal elections.

This is why securing elections is so important, whether that be via the SAVE America Act, or some sort of executive action. Until this problem is solved, we do not have a nation.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
45,601
34,717
113


California’s machine didn’t bury Spencer Pratt because he was on track to win Los Angeles. They buried him because he was already making the entire rigged operation look mortal.

That’s the part they can’t afford. A pragmatic outsider running on crime, homelessness, and basic competence ... using modern AI-driven ads instead of the same tired yard signs and mailers ... started cutting through the hopelessness they’ve spent years cultivating.

He wasn’t some generic Republican reciting talking points. He was showing people what a fixed city could actually look like, and too many were starting to pay attention.

So they moved. Not in November, when a Pratt run might have made Karen Bass uncomfortable. They moved now, in the primary, because five more months of him existing would have done permanent damage to the illusion that resistance is pointless in California.

The machine can survive losing. It cannot survive voters realizing the game isn’t as locked down as they’ve been told.

This was panic dressed up as inevitability.

When the establishment has to openly kneecap a candidate in the jungle primary just to protect the narrative, it tells you everything about how fragile their control actually is.

They didn’t kill his campaign to save the city. They killed it to save the con. And everyone watching just saw the mask slip.
(article below)
 

GDead_Tiger

Heisman
Dec 7, 2021
14,094
36,427
113


California’s machine didn’t bury Spencer Pratt because he was on track to win Los Angeles. They buried him because he was already making the entire rigged operation look mortal.

That’s the part they can’t afford. A pragmatic outsider running on crime, homelessness, and basic competence ... using modern AI-driven ads instead of the same tired yard signs and mailers ... started cutting through the hopelessness they’ve spent years cultivating.

He wasn’t some generic Republican reciting talking points. He was showing people what a fixed city could actually look like, and too many were starting to pay attention.

So they moved. Not in November, when a Pratt run might have made Karen Bass uncomfortable. They moved now, in the primary, because five more months of him existing would have done permanent damage to the illusion that resistance is pointless in California.

The machine can survive losing. It cannot survive voters realizing the game isn’t as locked down as they’ve been told.

This was panic dressed up as inevitability.

When the establishment has to openly kneecap a candidate in the jungle primary just to protect the narrative, it tells you everything about how fragile their control actually is.

They didn’t kill his campaign to save the city. They killed it to save the con. And everyone watching just saw the mask slip.
(article below)

Why didn't they just rig it so Karen Bass got 50% of the vote?
 

GDead_Tiger

Heisman
Dec 7, 2021
14,094
36,427
113
Good question honestly but its not a reason that fraud is not occurring.
So the LA county Dem establishment rigged an election in broad daylight that everyone can see but they didn't rig it for the incumbent to win outright, she now has to face an outside primary challenger who is more popular than she is. How does that make sense?
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
45,601
34,717
113
So the LA county Dem establishment rigged an election in broad daylight that everyone can see but they didn't rig it for the incumbent to win outright, she now has to face an outside primary challenger who is more popular than she is. How does that make sense?
Raman is not popular imo. Bass wins it comfortably at this point. Im personally hoping the DOJ found something and pounds them in the ground. Bass is a Castro commie. Let that sink in.