My goodness, it’s almost as if Los Angeles is a deep, deep Dodger blue bastion of progressive liberals who vote reliably for Democratic candidates over Republican candidates. It’s either that or a grand conspiracy against one of the most ridiculous Republican mayoral candidates imaginable.
Spencer Pratt - Next Los Angeles Mayor - CA Vote Counting Is Complete Sham
- Thread starter fatpiggy
- Start date
Its not that blue Einstein. We are talking about two dumocrats now ahead of the top Republican and the way it is occurring defies logic and reality. The percentages that Raman started pulling after election day do not happen in reality.
All the twitter bots you link incessantly is really persuasive. Combined with the rock solid proof Trump gave in his meet the press interview & I just don't know what to think anymore
Wildest takeaways from my time at the Ballot Processing Center today.
Signatures only need to be 40% accurate (!) this is the setting the machines are set at for LA County (called the ASV)
The last two drops disproportionately supported Raman. Are those coming from specific neighborhoods since they’re such an anomaly? Or are the neighborhoods pretty spread out that you count from on a given day? “We’re not sure.”
If you’re unable to sign, you can make a “mark” like a dot or slash instead of signing. A witness then signs below. I asked them how they verify these signatures. Turns out, they simply don’t.
Well, you must check the witness signatures, right? “No, we don’t.”
So what if I stole a ballot, made a dash by the person’s name, and signed my name? “You shouldn’t do that, but in theory it would be counted,” they said.
How many of these “marked” ballots get in per election? “We don’t know,” they said.
Ripe for fraud, no?
You guys are not persuadable. In fact you are cheering it on because the ends justify the means comrade. The vast majority of what I post is from real people.
Meet Shirley Weber
Shirley is the California Secretary of State
She is the key official refusing to fully comply with the DOJ’s demands for California’s statewide voter registration data
She is the reason California is blocking a Federal Audit of its Voter Rolls
Weber was appointed by Gavin Newsom in 2020
No, I am not making this up.
The U.S. DOJ sued California Secretary of State Shirley Weber in 2025 to compel the surrender of unredacted statewide voter records, but a federal district court dismissed the case entirely in January 2026.
The DOJ has appealed the ruling, and the litigation remains active.
It’s extremely concerning how California can hide their fraud with absolutely zero accountability
Absolutely shocking that this guy isn’t doing better in the LA mayoral race. HAS to be some sort of huge conspiracy for some reason. That’s obviously the only explanation
One thing is for sure. When Democrats are counting votes, crazy, statistically impossible things are possible.
Joe Biden can lose 18 out of 19 bellwether counties. He can lose Iowa, Ohio, and Florida. He can lose massive House seats and still get the most votes in presidential history.
It's MAGIC.
President Trump has something for you commies. Its coming.
Trump is letting everyone watch California cheat in REAL TIME — on purpose.
When the investigation in Fulton County, Maricopa County, and California all show the SAME pattern — and it comes out that foreign governments like Venezuela, Cuba, China, and Iran assisted — it becomes a NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT.
Then Trump writes the executive order: voter ID, one day voting, paper ballots. The D's can't object without proving they're on the side of foreign enemies.
Trump is letting everyone watch California cheat in REAL TIME — on purpose.
When the investigation in Fulton County, Maricopa County, and California all show the SAME pattern — and it comes out that foreign governments like Venezuela, Cuba, China, and Iran assisted — it becomes a NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT.
Then Trump writes the executive order: voter ID, one day voting, paper ballots. The D's can't object without proving they're on the side of foreign enemies.
What's insane is that they don't get that Bass would really rather go up against Pratt than Raman.
Bass could actually lose the general to Raman, but definitely not to Pratt.
In a city where there's a 4 to 1 Dem vs Republican registration edge, where do they think Pratt is going to get the votes to win in the general election?
Dem logic on display and this is why there is a "libs are not smart" thread.
This is correct, and this is what we, as LA residents, actually appreciate about our elections. When we have two Democrats in the general, we have a substantive, hard-fought, policy-based fight all the way to the end. When it’s a Democrat vs Republican, it is a ho-hum, superficial race with a foregone conclusion.
Trump told you and your ilk to vote on Election Day, in person, and never to vote via mail-in ballot (even though HE does). And now you're surprised that Pratt is doing poorly with respect to mail-in ballots? LOL, Trump Cultist.
The people have apparently spoken. Looks like the Repugnicant will finish in third place. Oooohhh, missed it by THAT much.
And BTW, I think this Raman gal might just take down Karen Bass in the general election. That would, in fact, be my preference.
DC Draino complaining and crying about a "rigged election." Music to my ears. I drink his tears.
Oh yeah, roll out the old "bellwether counties" argument again, even though it never worked before. Awesome. BWAHAHAHAHA!!
Wut? What is flawed in my logic? Where are Pratt's votes going to come from to win the general in an overwhelmingly Democratic city? What is "not smart" about my analysis?
In a hypothetical 3 way race in the general he may have a fighting chance but even that's doubtful.
OK dude, here's your chance. You've got a shot here to prove that you actually can do some independent thinking and analysis and that you're not just a retweet posting bot.
There's a simple explanation here. Most of the late deciding last minute voters were deciding between Bass and Raman.
"She conceded Tuesday night"
If there was some voter fraud scheme why would one of the candidates set to benefit from it prematurely concede?
If there was some voter fraud scheme why would one of the candidates set to benefit from it prematurely concede?
California counts votes based on when they came in. The strategy for democrats in California was to wait until close to the end to vote and drop off ballots because of the governors race. This obviously impacted the mayoral race.
Everything is a conspiracy when you don’t know how stuff works. You have to have an ID and proof of residence to register to vote. When you go to vote your name is checked against the registration rolls. If it seems like there might be an issue you are given a provisional ballot. Those are counted separately and checked individually. If you aren’t on the rolls then it’s discarded
No, you guys just don’t know how things work. There was a large batch drop with 0 votes for Pratt. There was also a large batch drop with every vote for Pratt. One batch reported was a stack of ballots for bass, the other was a stack of ballots for Pratt.
Wait, she even lost the district where she resides???
But after the mail in, she dominates the rest
Yea nothing to see here lol
But after the mail in, she dominates the rest
Yea nothing to see here lol
I love when the Dems use their fraudulent election schemes on meaningless Mayoral races instead of using it to win state/federal elections.
On paper your response passes the smell test, the problem is mathematically what we are seeing is statistically impossible.