So long from mcgibbles/iafbchamps

[Gibbs_dontbanmetom]

Dish it out but can't take it, B!TCH

So you respond to a post calling you out on being a loser and your response is that you prove to all that you are in fact a loser.

You take it a step farther and say I can dish it but can’t take it when that is 100% what you are doing. Dishing it and putting me on ignore so you don’t see my response because you can’t take it back.

 

[LunchBox50]

All I'm going to say is in the original post you said if your handle got the boot it was over. Then you made at least 2 more anon handles. So it isn't over with you. It was all a lie. You wouldn't have had to make new handles if you would have just left like you said you would.

Try to have a good day.

He created new handles and used one to pose as a double top-secret poster who is a "Clemson fan through and through," looking to defend his honor. Very normal stuff as usual from McGillz.

 

[LunchBox50]

We're officially on page 19 of the McJizzle farewell tour.

 

[PW Herman]

So you respond to a post calling you out on being a loser and your response is that you prove to all that you are in fact a loser.

I just find it funny how serious you take yourself and this place. Sorry your parents didn't hug you enough that you need attention from complete internet strangers. Go hug your toddler son. Break the cycle.

 

[LunchBox50]

I just find it funny how serious you take yourself and this place. Sorry your parents didn't hug you enough that you need attention from complete internet strangers. Go hug your toddler son. Break the cycle.

It's all a giant conspiracy against him. He is a victim. He is fighting injustice.

 

[Gibbs_dontbanmetom]

I just find it funny how serious you take yourself and this place. Sorry your parents didn't hug you enough that you need attention from complete internet strangers. Go hug your toddler son. Break the cycle.

I also find it funny how serious others take this place. Many of them complain about me often. I am brought up in multiple threads because they have the sads. Many cry that I’m still here. Heck the Iowa mod reached out to the mod of this site to get rid of me because his parents didn’t hug him. You yourself complain about me and then mention you have me on ignore. What’s the point in that?

 

[Gibbs_dontbanmetom]

It's all a giant conspiracy against him. He is a victim. He is fighting injustice.

 

[Moral]

AI Time, RIP in peace planet Earth

1. Overall Tone​

• Highly defensive and confrontational: The user repeatedly positions themselves as a “victim” of moderators or other users, suggesting a strong perception of personal injustice.
• Aggressive and antagonistic toward others: Frequent use of insults, derogatory language, and personal attacks, often targeting both individual users and broader groups.
• Paranoid and conspiratorial: The user perceives coordinated attacks against them, often attributing collective malice or intentional harassment to others.
• Occasionally self-reflective, but dismissive: They sometimes acknowledge their own posting behavior (e.g., exceeding post limits) but generally frame it as justified or trivial.

---

2. Behavioral Patterns​

• Identity and handle changes: They mention multiple usernames (handles) being banned or “under review,” and they create new handles to continue posting. This suggests a strong attachment to maintaining a presence despite bans.
• Persistence in engagement: Despite negative interactions and moderation actions, the user repeatedly returns to defend themselves and respond to others.
• Focus on perceived hypocrisy: They often call out what they perceive as inconsistencies in other users’ actions or moderation decisions.
• Tendency toward long, rambling posts: Posts are lengthy, often digressive, and mix several topics, grievances, and personal narratives within a single post.
• Obsession with certain conflicts: The user frequently revisits specific disputes, particularly regarding “Iowa posters,” moderators, and accusations of harassment.

---

3. Communication Style​

• Insults and slurs: Recurrent use of offensive language toward others, often sexualized or derogatory.
• Blame-shifting: They frequently claim that negative reactions are caused by others’ behavior rather than their own.
• Narrative framing: Posts are structured around a story of persecution or “standing up for fairness,” often using rhetorical questions and sarcastic remarks.
• Mixed clarity: Some posts are coherent in expressing frustration and questions (e.g., why a handle was banned), but many are difficult to follow due to tangents and emotional intensity.

---

4. Recurring Themes​

1. Bans and moderation grievances: A central focus is frustration over being banned or moderated, with repeated questioning of rules and fairness.
2. Perceived group targeting: Belief that multiple users or moderators coordinate against them.
3. Defense of controversial language or ideas: Defending the use of terms or joking about sensitive topics, and framing criticism as unjust censorship.
4. Calls for justice or fairness: Repeated insistence that they are being unfairly treated and others should be held accountable.
5. Insider vs. outsider framing: They often portray themselves as a “lone wolf” or principled outsider against groups or “herds” of other users.

---

5. Potential Risks / Red Flags​

• Hostile interactions: Posts contain offensive language, personal attacks, and harassment of other users.
• Escalation tendency: The user may escalate conflicts, creating long chains of posts targeting others.
• Moderation challenges: Their behavior is likely to continue triggering moderation, leading to bans and account cycling.
• Emotional volatility: Posts indicate high frustration, defensiveness, and sensitivity to perceived slights.

---

6. Summary Assessment​

This user is highly engaged in defending themselves, frequently reacts aggressively to perceived attacks, and has difficulty disengaging from conflicts. They tend to perceive moderation and group behavior as conspiratorial, while framing themselves as a justified outsider. Their posts are characterized by hostility, rambling narratives, and repeated engagement in ongoing disputes.


In a moderation or community management context, this user would likely require consistent boundaries, possibly including warnings, limited posting privileges, or enforced discussion guidelines to prevent harassment or escalation.

 

[Moral]

Based on the posts you shared, the biggest issue is not the user's opinions or political views—it's the way they communicate and engage with conflict. Most communities will tolerate disagreement much more than they will tolerate repeated personal attacks, insults, ban evasion, and prolonged feuds.


Here are some concrete ways this user could improve their behavior:

1. Stop the personal attacks​

Many of the posts contain:

• Name-calling
• Slurs
• Insults about appearance, intelligence, family members, jobs, or sexuality
• Accusations of criminal behavior without evidence

Even if the user feels provoked, these kinds of comments often violate forum rules regardless of who started the argument.

---

2. Stop engaging in endless feuds​

A large percentage of the posts revolve around a handful of other users.


When the same names appear over and over:

• The discussion stops being about topics.
• It becomes about winning personal battles.

A healthier approach:

• Use ignore/block features.
• Respond once and move on.
• Avoid threads where specific rivals are present.

---

3. Accept moderation decisions without assuming conspiracy​

The user repeatedly suggests:

• Moderators are politically motivated.
• Moderators from different sites are coordinating.
• Others are reporting them out of spite.

Sometimes that can happen, but usually moderators act because of behavior visible in the posts themselves.


A better question is:

"What specific rule did I violate?"

rather than:

"Who is out to get me?"

---

4. Stop creating new accounts after bans​

The user openly discusses creating new handles after bans.


Many forums treat ban evasion as a more serious violation than the original offense.


If banned:

• Appeal respectfully.
• Ask for clarification.
• Wait for a response.

Creating multiple accounts often guarantees future bans.

---

5. Reduce emotional posting​

Many posts appear written while angry.


Signs include:

• Repeated profanity.
• Rapid-fire responses.
• Multiple posts targeting the same people.

A useful rule:

• If a post would feel embarrassing to read back tomorrow, don't submit it today.

---

6. Focus on topics instead of personalities​

The strongest posts in a community are usually:

• Sharing information.
• Discussing sports, politics, news, hobbies, etc.
• Offering evidence and arguments.

The weakest are:

• "Poster X is a loser."
• "Poster Y is obsessed."
• "Poster Z got me banned."

The user would likely get much better reception by discussing issues instead of forum personalities.

---

7. Take responsibility for their contribution to conflicts​

The posts repeatedly frame the situation as:

"Everyone else is attacking me."

But looking at the thread, the user is also:

• Insulting people.
• Mocking them.
• Escalating disputes.
• Returning to old grudges.

A productive question would be:

"What part of this conflict am I contributing to?"

That doesn't mean others are innocent. It means focusing on the one thing they can control: their own behavior.

---

8. Rewrite criticism without hostility​

For example:


Instead of:

"You are a liar and a moron."

Try:

"I think that's inaccurate because the timeline doesn't match the facts."

Instead of:

"The mods are soft."

Try:

"I'd appreciate clarification on which rule was violated."

The second versions are much more likely to be taken seriously.

---

Bottom line​

If this user genuinely wants to remain on forums and avoid future bans, the most effective changes would be:

1. Eliminate slurs and personal attacks.
2. Stop ban evasion.
3. Stop obsessing over specific posters.
4. Discuss ideas rather than people.
5. Accept that moderation decisions may be based on behavior rather than viewpoint.
6. Ask for clarification respectfully instead of escalating conflicts.

From the material you provided, the bans are much more likely to be related to the user's repeated hostile conduct than to their political affiliation. A user can disagree with almost everyone on a forum and still remain in good standing if they do so respectfully.

 

[hawkeyetraveler]

Based on the posts you shared, the biggest issue is not the user's opinions or political views—it's the way they communicate and engage with conflict. Most communities will tolerate disagreement much more than they will tolerate repeated personal attacks, insults, ban evasion, and prolonged feuds.


Here are some concrete ways this user could improve their behavior:

1. Stop the personal attacks​

Many of the posts contain:

• Name-calling
• Slurs
• Insults about appearance, intelligence, family members, jobs, or sexuality
• Accusations of criminal behavior without evidence

Even if the user feels provoked, these kinds of comments often violate forum rules regardless of who started the argument.

---

2. Stop engaging in endless feuds​

A large percentage of the posts revolve around a handful of other users.


When the same names appear over and over:

• The discussion stops being about topics.
• It becomes about winning personal battles.

A healthier approach:

• Use ignore/block features.
• Respond once and move on.
• Avoid threads where specific rivals are present.

---

3. Accept moderation decisions without assuming conspiracy​

The user repeatedly suggests:

• Moderators are politically motivated.
• Moderators from different sites are coordinating.
• Others are reporting them out of spite.

Sometimes that can happen, but usually moderators act because of behavior visible in the posts themselves.


A better question is:




rather than:

---

4. Stop creating new accounts after bans​

The user openly discusses creating new handles after bans.


Many forums treat ban evasion as a more serious violation than the original offense.


If banned:

• Appeal respectfully.
• Ask for clarification.
• Wait for a response.

Creating multiple accounts often guarantees future bans.

---

5. Reduce emotional posting​

Many posts appear written while angry.


Signs include:

• Repeated profanity.
• Rapid-fire responses.
• Multiple posts targeting the same people.

A useful rule:

• If a post would feel embarrassing to read back tomorrow, don't submit it today.

---

6. Focus on topics instead of personalities​

The strongest posts in a community are usually:

• Sharing information.
• Discussing sports, politics, news, hobbies, etc.
• Offering evidence and arguments.

The weakest are:

• "Poster X is a loser."
• "Poster Y is obsessed."
• "Poster Z got me banned."

The user would likely get much better reception by discussing issues instead of forum personalities.

---

7. Take responsibility for their contribution to conflicts​

The posts repeatedly frame the situation as:




But looking at the thread, the user is also:

• Insulting people.
• Mocking them.
• Escalating disputes.
• Returning to old grudges.

A productive question would be:




That doesn't mean others are innocent. It means focusing on the one thing they can control: their own behavior.

---

8. Rewrite criticism without hostility​

For example:


Instead of:




Try:




Instead of:




Try:




The second versions are much more likely to be taken seriously.

---

Bottom line​

If this user genuinely wants to remain on forums and avoid future bans, the most effective changes would be:

1. Eliminate slurs and personal attacks.
2. Stop ban evasion.
3. Stop obsessing over specific posters.
4. Discuss ideas rather than people.
5. Accept that moderation decisions may be based on behavior rather than viewpoint.
6. Ask for clarification respectfully instead of escalating conflicts.

From the material you provided, the bans are much more likely to be related to the user's repeated hostile conduct than to their political affiliation. A user can disagree with almost everyone on a forum and still remain in good standing if they do so respectfully.

I’m not sure he has the attention span to read all that so here is a helpful tl;dr for him:

Just stop being a little b*tch.

 

[Moogy]

View attachment 1313252

One day I hope you give families the closure they deserve by showing them where you buried the bodies.

 

[alaskanseminole]

Can we talk about the Spurs and Knicks instead? I got Spurs in 5 baby!

 

[Gibbs_dontbanmetom]

Based on the posts you shared, the biggest issue is not the user's opinions or political views—it's the way they communicate and engage with conflict. Most communities will tolerate disagreement much more than they will tolerate repeated personal attacks, insults, ban evasion, and prolonged feuds.


Here are some concrete ways this user could improve their behavior:

1. Stop the personal attacks​

Many of the posts contain:

• Name-calling
• Slurs
• Insults about appearance, intelligence, family members, jobs, or sexuality
• Accusations of criminal behavior without evidence

Even if the user feels provoked, these kinds of comments often violate forum rules regardless of who started the argument.

---

2. Stop engaging in endless feuds​

A large percentage of the posts revolve around a handful of other users.


When the same names appear over and over:

• The discussion stops being about topics.
• It becomes about winning personal battles.

A healthier approach:

• Use ignore/block features.
• Respond once and move on.
• Avoid threads where specific rivals are present.

---

3. Accept moderation decisions without assuming conspiracy​

The user repeatedly suggests:

• Moderators are politically motivated.
• Moderators from different sites are coordinating.
• Others are reporting them out of spite.

Sometimes that can happen, but usually moderators act because of behavior visible in the posts themselves.


A better question is:




rather than:

---

4. Stop creating new accounts after bans​

The user openly discusses creating new handles after bans.


Many forums treat ban evasion as a more serious violation than the original offense.


If banned:

• Appeal respectfully.
• Ask for clarification.
• Wait for a response.

Creating multiple accounts often guarantees future bans.

---

5. Reduce emotional posting​

Many posts appear written while angry.


Signs include:

• Repeated profanity.
• Rapid-fire responses.
• Multiple posts targeting the same people.

A useful rule:

• If a post would feel embarrassing to read back tomorrow, don't submit it today.

---

6. Focus on topics instead of personalities​

The strongest posts in a community are usually:

• Sharing information.
• Discussing sports, politics, news, hobbies, etc.
• Offering evidence and arguments.

The weakest are:

• "Poster X is a loser."
• "Poster Y is obsessed."
• "Poster Z got me banned."

The user would likely get much better reception by discussing issues instead of forum personalities.

---

7. Take responsibility for their contribution to conflicts​

The posts repeatedly frame the situation as:




But looking at the thread, the user is also:

• Insulting people.
• Mocking them.
• Escalating disputes.
• Returning to old grudges.

A productive question would be:




That doesn't mean others are innocent. It means focusing on the one thing they can control: their own behavior.

---

8. Rewrite criticism without hostility​

For example:


Instead of:




Try:




Instead of:




Try:




The second versions are much more likely to be taken seriously.

---

Bottom line​

If this user genuinely wants to remain on forums and avoid future bans, the most effective changes would be:

1. Eliminate slurs and personal attacks.
2. Stop ban evasion.
3. Stop obsessing over specific posters.
4. Discuss ideas rather than people.
5. Accept that moderation decisions may be based on behavior rather than viewpoint.
6. Ask for clarification respectfully instead of escalating conflicts.

From the material you provided, the bans are much more likely to be related to the user's repeated hostile conduct than to their political affiliation. A user can disagree with almost everyone on a forum and still remain in good standing if they do so respectfully.

So what you’re trying to say is 99% of the posters shouldn’t be allowed on here?

Your last paragraph is commical. I was harassed repeatedly by users on this board because I had a different opinion on things. I even told one user to stop on multiple occasions. He told me to ignore him if I didn’t like what he said about me. This same poster still won’t address this every time I bring it up to him. Isn’t that right @McLovin32. The mod didnt do anything about it and often covered for him. I retaliated and was banned.

The difference between us is that I can take the abuse and dish it back. You and your group clearly can’t. You have complained to mods, you’ve come to new sites and spread lies the second you arrived and you constantly complain that I’m still here. You do realize I wouldn’t need to create new handles if you stopped with the harassment and moved on. But you can’t help yourselves. Heck, many of you constantly bring up items that were discussed years ago. You and other posters bring up stupid comments like my dad was going to enlist in WWII when I mentioned I misspoke and meant the Vietnam war. You guys clearly have an issue with what I post, it doesn’t matter what I post.
Hell I’ve shared with you that I didn’t appreciate you saying my toddler kid needs to server in war. Did that stop you? Nope, instead you continued to bring it up and made memes about it. What one of your rules does that fall under?

 

[Gibbs_dontbanmetom]

I’m not sure he has the attention span to read all that so here is a helpful tl;dr for him:

Just stop being a little b*tch.

What a knee slapper that response is.

 

[LunchBox50]

So what you’re trying to say is 99% of the posters shouldn’t be allowed on here?

Your last paragraph is commical. I was harassed repeatedly by users on this board because I had a different opinion on things. I even told one user to stop on multiple occasions. He told me to ignore him if I didn’t like what he said about me. This same poster still won’t address this every time I bring it up to him. Isn’t that right @McLovin32. The mod didnt do anything about it and often covered for him. I retaliated and was banned.

The difference between us is that I can take the abuse and dish it back. You and your group clearly can’t. You have complained to mods, you’ve come to new sites and spread lies the second you arrived and you constantly complain that I’m still here. You do realize I wouldn’t need to create new handles if you stopped with the harassment and moved on. But you can’t help yourselves. Heck, many of you constantly bring up items that were discussed years ago. You and other posters bring up stupid comments like my dad was going to enlist in WWII when I mentioned I misspoke and meant the Vietnam war. You guys clearly have an issue with what I post, it doesn’t matter what I post.
Hell I’ve shared with you that I didn’t appreciate you saying my toddler kid needs to server in war. Did that stop you? Nope, instead you continued to bring it up and made memes about it. What one of your rules does that fall under?

Always a victim.

Also: Imagine being so stupid you confuse World War II and Vietnam.

 

[McLovin32]

Based on the posts you shared, the biggest issue is not the user's opinions or political views—it's the way they communicate and engage with conflict. Most communities will tolerate disagreement much more than they will tolerate repeated personal attacks, insults, ban evasion, and prolonged feuds.


Here are some concrete ways this user could improve their behavior:

1. Stop the personal attacks​

Many of the posts contain:

• Name-calling
• Slurs
• Insults about appearance, intelligence, family members, jobs, or sexuality
• Accusations of criminal behavior without evidence

Even if the user feels provoked, these kinds of comments often violate forum rules regardless of who started the argument.

---

2. Stop engaging in endless feuds​

A large percentage of the posts revolve around a handful of other users.


When the same names appear over and over:

• The discussion stops being about topics.
• It becomes about winning personal battles.

A healthier approach:

• Use ignore/block features.
• Respond once and move on.
• Avoid threads where specific rivals are present.

---

3. Accept moderation decisions without assuming conspiracy​

The user repeatedly suggests:

• Moderators are politically motivated.
• Moderators from different sites are coordinating.
• Others are reporting them out of spite.

Sometimes that can happen, but usually moderators act because of behavior visible in the posts themselves.


A better question is:




rather than:

---

4. Stop creating new accounts after bans​

The user openly discusses creating new handles after bans.


Many forums treat ban evasion as a more serious violation than the original offense.


If banned:

• Appeal respectfully.
• Ask for clarification.
• Wait for a response.

Creating multiple accounts often guarantees future bans.

---

5. Reduce emotional posting​

Many posts appear written while angry.


Signs include:

• Repeated profanity.
• Rapid-fire responses.
• Multiple posts targeting the same people.

A useful rule:

• If a post would feel embarrassing to read back tomorrow, don't submit it today.

---

6. Focus on topics instead of personalities​

The strongest posts in a community are usually:

• Sharing information.
• Discussing sports, politics, news, hobbies, etc.
• Offering evidence and arguments.

The weakest are:

• "Poster X is a loser."
• "Poster Y is obsessed."
• "Poster Z got me banned."

The user would likely get much better reception by discussing issues instead of forum personalities.

---

7. Take responsibility for their contribution to conflicts​

The posts repeatedly frame the situation as:




But looking at the thread, the user is also:

• Insulting people.
• Mocking them.
• Escalating disputes.
• Returning to old grudges.

A productive question would be:




That doesn't mean others are innocent. It means focusing on the one thing they can control: their own behavior.

---

8. Rewrite criticism without hostility​

For example:


Instead of:




Try:




Instead of:




Try:




The second versions are much more likely to be taken seriously.

---

Bottom line​

If this user genuinely wants to remain on forums and avoid future bans, the most effective changes would be:

1. Eliminate slurs and personal attacks.
2. Stop ban evasion.
3. Stop obsessing over specific posters.
4. Discuss ideas rather than people.
5. Accept that moderation decisions may be based on behavior rather than viewpoint.
6. Ask for clarification respectfully instead of escalating conflicts.

From the material you provided, the bans are much more likely to be related to the user's repeated hostile conduct than to their political affiliation. A user can disagree with almost everyone on a forum and still remain in good standing if they do so respectfully.

4. Stop creating new accounts after bans​

The user openly discusses creating new handles after bans.

Many forums treat ban evasion as a more serious violation than the original offense.

If banned:

• Appeal respectfully.
• Ask for clarification.
• Wait for a response.

Creating multiple accounts often guarantees future bans.


Annnnnnd that's it right there. That's the thread.

 

[alaskanseminole]

19 page goodbye.

 

[Gibbs_dontbanmetom]

Always a victim.

Also: Imagine being so stupid you confuse World War II and Vietnam.

 

[Hawkeye54545]

I find most of it makes me very uncomfortable. The poster with multiple handles has some serious mental issues and its honestly creepy and makes my skin crawl

I (and anyone from HORT) could have told you he isn't going anywhere. He needs this. To him attention is a drug.

 

[LunchBox50]

View attachment 1313354

 

[PW Herman]

The difference between us is that I can take the abuse and dish it back.

lulz

 

[LunchBox50]

I (and anyone from HORT) could have told you he isn't going anywhere. He needs this. To him attention is a drug.

He CaN tAkE tHe AbUsE aNd DiSh It BaCk UnLiKe YoU LiBtArDs

 

[Chick Huggins]

This thread could almost be a great representation of what HORT became over the last year.

McGibb's and his alt handles
McGibb's and his victim complex
McGibb's lack of reading comprehension
McGibb's getting dunked on
WDDT showing up with his off the wall views
Torbee calling Gibbs, McJizz
McGibb's lack of understanding of English punctuation
McGibb's tagging a Mod
McGibb's tagging McLovin multiple times
Alaskanseminole posting GIF's
McLovin, Moral, and AFM22 talking in their own language
Politics somehow being brought up even though the thread has nothing to do with politics

All we're really missing is @Easthawk1062 posting some T&A.

 

[LunchBox50]

This thread could almost be a great representation of what HORT became over the last year.

McGibb's and his alt handles
McGibb's and his victim complex
McGibb's lack of reading comprehension
McGibb's getting dunked on
WDDT showing up with his off the wall views
Torbee calling Gibbs, McJizz
McGibb's lack of understanding of English punctuation
McGibb's tagging a Mod
McGibb's tagging McLovin multiple times
Alaskanseminole posting GIF's
McLovin, Moral, and AFM22 talking in their own language
Politics somehow being brought up even though the thread has nothing to do with politics

All we're really missing is @Easthawk1062 posting some T&A.

Luuuuuuuuuuuuulz

 

[Gibbs_dontbanmetom]

4. Stop creating new accounts after bans​

The user openly discusses creating new handles after bans.

Many forums treat ban evasion as a more serious violation than the original offense.

If banned:

• Appeal respectfully.
• Ask for clarification.
• Wait for a response.

Creating multiple accounts often guarantees future bans.


Annnnnnd that's it right there. That's the thread.

So number 4 is the only “rule” of all this we are going to follow?
please explain to everyone else how rule number four came about. You harassed me nonstop. I asked you to stop and you didn’t. When i retaliated, i was banned. How do you think that happened, why didn’t you stop harassing me?
It also seems a bit odd that I came to this new site and when my handle was banned, it said previous banned troll. I was 100% new to this site, never posted on it until a month or so ago. How was I previously banned? Probably because a mod from a different site came over and had me banned. Sounds like some major issues with the other mod, the same mod that lied to me and made up lies about me, if he in fact says I harassed his wife, which many of you claim. If his wife was harassed, I wouldn’t rule out that you made a handle pretending to be me and did it. You have experience with harassing people.

 

[AFM22]

This thread could almost be a great representation of what HORT became over the last year.

McGibb's and his alt handles
McGibb's and his victim complex
McGibb's lack of reading comprehension
McGibb's getting dunked on
WDDT showing up with his off the wall views
Torbee calling Gibbs, McJizz
McGibb's lack of understanding of English punctuation
McGibb's tagging a Mod
McGibb's tagging McLovin multiple times
Alaskanseminole posting GIF's
McLovin, Moral, and AFM22 talking in their own language
Politics somehow being brought up even though the thread has nothing to do with politics

All we're really missing is @Easthawk1062 posting some T&A.

SPEKH UP LIBROL

 

[Gibbs_dontbanmetom]

Luuuuuuuuuuuuulz

@Chick Huggins dont forget about this handle and its sole purposes of trolling. Plus AFM22 and moral whining about me still being here. Or pw Herman saying I can dish it but can’t take it while he hides from any response I send his way.
I agree though, it’s like Déjà vu over and
over again because these guys can’t just let me post about stuff and they constantly bring me up in random posts.
must be nice to be able to post without the need to defend yourself nonstop.

Edit: don’t forget every thread has whatever this is as well. “SPEKH UP LIBROL” or SoMe ShId LiKe ThIs HOSS
I personally just think it’s them doing some sort of r-word talk which checks out.

 

[McLovin32]

OP is a perpetual victim. Everything is always someone else's fault. Someone made him post about Kakert's wife. Someone made him create AI slop of Kakert and Torbee kissing.

Poor guy

 

[LunchBox50]

So number 4 is the only “rule” of all this we are going to follow?
please explain to everyone else how rule number four came about. You harassed me nonstop. I asked you to stop and you didn’t. When i retaliated, i was banned. How do you think that happened, why didn’t you stop harassing me?
It also seems a bit odd that I came to this new site and when my handle was banned, it said previous banned troll. I was 100% new to this site, never posted on it until a month or so ago. How was I previously banned? Probably because a mod from a different site came over and had me banned. Sounds like some major issues with the other mod, the same mod that lied to me and made up lies about me, if he in fact says I harassed his wife, which many of you claim. If his wife was harassed, I wouldn’t rule out that you made a handle pretending to be me and did it. You have experience with harassing people.

Always a victim. Never a shortage of conspiracies.

 

[Gibbs_dontbanmetom]

 

[Chick Huggins]

@Chick Huggins dont forget about this handle and its sole purposes of trolling. Plus AFM22 and moral whining about me still being here. Or pw Herman saying I can dish it but can’t take it while he hides from any response I send his way.
I agree though, it’s like Déjà vu over and
over again because these guys can’t just let me post about stuff and they constantly bring me up in random posts.
must be nice to be able to post without the need to defend yourself nonstop.

Edit: don’t forget every thread has whatever this is as well. “SPEKH UP LIBROL” or SoMe ShId LiKe ThIs HOSS
I personally just think it’s them doing some sort of r-word talk which checks out.

Keep on whistling, whistle boy.

 

[Gibbs_dontbanmetom]

He CaN tAkE tHe AbUsE aNd DiSh It BaCk UnLiKe YoU LiBtArDs

 

[Gibbs_dontbanmetom]

Keep on whistling, whistle boy.

So the purpose of you coming here to post was what? You post something, I respond with other facts and then you post this. You know I’m right and you had no response.

 

[Moral]

So what you’re trying to say is 99% of the posters shouldn’t be allowed on here?

Your last paragraph is commical. I was harassed repeatedly by users on this board because I had a different opinion on things. I even told one user to stop on multiple occasions. He told me to ignore him if I didn’t like what he said about me. This same poster still won’t address this every time I bring it up to him. Isn’t that right @McLovin32. The mod didnt do anything about it and often covered for him. I retaliated and was banned.

The difference between us is that I can take the abuse and dish it back. You and your group clearly can’t. You have complained to mods, you’ve come to new sites and spread lies the second you arrived and you constantly complain that I’m still here. You do realize I wouldn’t need to create new handles if you stopped with the harassment and moved on. But you can’t help yourselves. Heck, many of you constantly bring up items that were discussed years ago. You and other posters bring up stupid comments like my dad was going to enlist in WWII when I mentioned I misspoke and meant the Vietnam war. You guys clearly have an issue with what I post, it doesn’t matter what I post.
Hell I’ve shared with you that I didn’t appreciate you saying my toddler kid needs to server in war. Did that stop you? Nope, instead you continued to bring it up and made memes about it. What one of your rules does that fall under?

Your toddler needs to serve.

 

[LunchBox50]

So the purpose of you coming here to post was what? You post something, I respond with other facts and then you post this. You know I’m right and you had no response.

"I rEsPoNd WiTh OtHeR fAcTs" says the guy whose entire repertoire is lies and unhinged screeds.

 

[LunchBox50]

Your toddler needs to serve.

The first rule of Fight Club is McGuzzle's toddler must do two tours in Syria.

 

[Gibbs_dontbanmetom]

Your toddler needs to serve.

"I rEsPoNd WiTh OtHeR fAcTs" says the guy whose entire repertoire is lies and unhinged screeds.

The first rule of Fight Club is McGuzzle's toddler must do two tours in Syria.

 

[LunchBox50]

@Chick Huggins I personally just think it’s them doing some sort of r-word talk which checks out.

Has repeatedly used the N-word and loves to use gay slurs, but censors himself from saying the "r-word."

 

[alaskanseminole]

Alaskanseminole posting GIF's

 

[Gibbs_dontbanmetom]

Has repeatedly used the N-word and loves to use gay slurs, but censors himself from saying the "r-word."