So long from mcgibbles/iafbchamps

Torbee

Heisman
Sep 13, 2002
12,413
57,421
113
"trong suit" is two words. You'll get it, eventually. Also, sentences start with a capital letter. Writing words is HARD!
season head GIF
 

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
5,768
4,164
113
Don’t forget the comment I made stating every lib here would also be a pedo then as they all call Trump one 24/7

You're special.

Follow along:

No one thinks your argument was correct or persuasive. You're an absolute buffoon.

However, if you construct an argument, even if it's completely unsound or invalid, but it implicates you, negatively, then that necessarily is an admission that that negative portrayal applies to you.

Do you understand? Probably not, since you act like you only have a 3rd grade education.

So, to illustrate ...

Hypothetically, you could argue the following (this is you, writing this argument) ...

McGibbs is from Iowa
Everyone from Iowa is a pathetic loser

...

Now, the necessary implication here ... the only valid conclusion to this argument is ... "McGibbs is a pathetic loser."

That's what YOU would think. That's your argument. You announce you're from Iowa, you say everyone from Iowa is a pathetic loser ... ergo, you think you're a pathetic loser.

Now, this doesn't mean that argument is sound ... because not everyone from Iowa actually is a pathetic loser. But, because you think it it's true, and you implicated yourself negatively in this, that means you ARE a pathetic loser ... even if other Iowans are not pathetic losers. One doesn't need to accept that your assertion that Iowans are all pathetic losers is true to acknowledge that you called yourself a pathetic loser.

Applying that here, you called people pedos ... then you said pedos recognize pedos. Ergo, your argument is that you're a pedo, and you recognize other pedos. So, the negative self-portrayal - that you're a pedo, stands as an admission. But this doesn't mean you're correct that the people you called pedos are pedos. Got it?

In sum, you're a pedo, as you admitted. No one else has been proven to be a pedo ... except you.
 

Anon789828

Redshirt
Jun 1, 2026
99
29
8
You're special.

Follow along:

No one thinks your argument was correct or persuasive. You're an absolute buffoon.

However, if you construct an argument, even if it's completely unsound or invalid, but it implicates you, negatively, then that necessarily is an admission that that negative portrayal applies to you.

Do you understand? Probably not, since you act like you only have a 3rd grade education.

So, to illustrate ...

Hypothetically, you could argue the following (this is you, writing this argument) ...

McGibbs is from Iowa
Everyone from Iowa is a pathetic loser

...

Now, the necessary implication here ... the only valid conclusion to this argument is ... "McGibbs is a pathetic loser."

That's what YOU would think. That's your argument. You announce you're from Iowa, you say everyone from Iowa is a pathetic loser ... ergo, you think you're a pathetic loser.

Now, this doesn't mean that argument is sound ... because not everyone from Iowa actually is a pathetic loser. But, because you think it it's true, and you implicated yourself negatively in this, that means you ARE a pathetic loser ... even if other Iowans are not pathetic losers. One doesn't need to accept that your assertion that Iowans are all pathetic losers is true to acknowledge that you called yourself a pathetic loser.

Applying that here, you called people pedos ... then you said pedos recognize pedos. Ergo, your argument is that you're a pedo, and you recognize other pedos. So, the negative self-portrayal - that you're a pedo, stands as an admission. But this doesn't mean you're correct that the people you called pedos are pedos. Got it?

In sum, you're a pedo, as you admitted. No one else has been proven to be a pedo ... except you.
You know, I’d love to join you in making fun of flat billed fatty but damn you are a slow one.
This seems kinda creepy. How would you know this?
Because he works at a company where this is all public information. It’s on the internets, you can even find out how little amount of money he makes while free loading of his in-laws which he has bragged about in the past.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,741
23,678
113
You know, I’d love to join you in making fun of flat billed fatty but damn you are a slow one.

Because he works at a company where this is all public information. It’s on the internets, you can even find out how little amount of money he makes while free loading of his in-laws which he has bragged about in the past.
But these should be anonymous message boards so why would you be researching someone's work profile, unless you were planning to dox him?
 

Anon789828

Redshirt
Jun 1, 2026
99
29
8
When do you plan on answering that question about Mcgibbs calling you out about harassing him a long time ago. Did he or did he not tell you multiple times to put him on ignore if you didn’t like what he was posting? Why do you keep avoiding the question?
It’s been almost 24 hours now @McLovin32 why can’t you answer this question?
 

PalmettoTiger1

Heisman
Jan 24, 2009
12,693
12,498
113
It only that we have losses creating handles to get passed the ignore function. So we can’t even really ignore the Iowa losers.

On3 needs to defend their business model. We already have a main board, what is the purpose of the team board if Iowa people can invade and post about Iowa in a Clemson board. It makes no sense

@GenMod

Where are our long term board members who are loyal left wing liberal Democrats on this board who need to step up and run these berserkers off this board

Where was @dpic73 my anti-hero nemesis who disagrees with everything I say

I am sending out my @dpic73 to call him to action to use his literary rhetorical superpowers to send the demons back to Iowa and their other rhelms

As Bennie Henn would say DEMONS BEGONE
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,741
23,678
113
Where are our long term board members who are loyal left wing liberal Democrats on this board who need to step up and run these berserkers off this board

Where was @dpic73 my anti-hero nemesis who disagrees with everything I say

I am sending out my @dpic73 to call him to action to use his literary rhetorical superpowers to send the demons back to Iowa and their other rhelms

As Bennie Henn would say DEMONS BEGONE
Why would I do that when I like having them here Peepaw? Though you won't even see this because you have me blocked lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AFM22