Liar. On the old site you once commented that you would run the ball at least 90% of the plays.
Of course, it’s convenient for you to deny it NOW, since it is not possible to pull that old post up. It wouldn’t matter anyway, since you would just say you were mischaracterized, and would write a rambling diatribe explaining why you didn’t say it, even though you really did.
You aren’t fooling anyone, and I’m not getting drawn in to another of your p*ssing matches. Readers of this thread can decide for themselves who to believe.
My conversation with you on this is now closed.
(Don’t even try to deny you said it….you are always saying “run the ball” and post laugh emojis on posts that mention improving the passing game or talk about having an effective passing attack. Again…you aren’t fooling anyone.)
It's also convenient for you to be able to now mischaracterize. Wish the archives were transferred over. Although I'm sure nobody cares.
You imply a lot from 3 words (run the ball) and emojis. You have quite the imagination.
What exactly, did you imply from the times I had to break down for you guys, that although it would make me very happy if Iowa ran the ball a lot more, and although, if I had a program of my own I'd love to be able to run it 90% of the time, I understand that you have to build your entire program in that way?
I understand that KF's program isn't built that way. And I don't expect Iowa to run the ball as much as I would in my fantasy situation. I support everything about how KF runs and has built his program.
Surely you remember those posts of delineation, as you've been emoji stalking nearly every one of my posts for years.
So, clearly I recognize the value of the run game. I don't know why that's so triggering to so many. It does not also mean I don't understand the value the passing game. It's just not my style of ball.
But my point about the passing game has always been that it's not as important as fans believe it to be.
But moreso, and in relation to Hawkeye football, my point has been that the lack of a potent passing game, or any passing game at all, has in no way been significant enough to justify the amount of negativity that the program has taken for it.
All KF has done, is win for near the entirety of 26 years, and that's all that matters. He's done it with a distinct style, that hasn't happened to be very dynamic in the passing game, but has been beyond proven to be successful.
So my thoughts about the passing game have been, almost entirely, a commentary about fans. Again, given the fact that you've been stalking my posts for years, it's nearly impossible to believe that you don't understand that.
Quite shocking, truthfully. I guess you're just going to have to apply enough desitin to actually allow you to be able to understand the words you are reading.
And don't call me a liar
