Pitt should have been in
- Thread starter Heelacious2315
- Start date
You could argue State shouldn’t have been in so did the Acc really get shafted?
Mainly Pitt is better than state.
The only acc thing that got shafted was us, everyone else (except maybe uva) got a bump including VT somehow being a 2
Avent doesn’t announce his retirement and State doesn’t get in. Slick move
I never thought Pitt was better than State watching us play both the last 3 weeks.
We played 35 innings against Pitt and didn’t trail after a single one.
14-20 in conference games is not worthy of a bid.
We played 35 innings against Pitt and didn’t trail after a single one.
14-20 in conference games is not worthy of a bid.
Got to sit in on Pitt's press conference after UNC beat them Saturday in Charlotte... they seemed pretty convinced that they'd be in
I don’t know if they were convinced but Coach Bell did make a convincing argument to get in.
Metrically speaking...
NC State: RPI 50, 5-11 Q1, 8-5 Q2, 6-3 Q3, 13-3 Q4
Pitt: RPI 39, 10-13 Q1, 4-2 Q2, 7-9 Q3, 12-0 Q4
NC State: RPI 50, 5-11 Q1, 8-5 Q2, 6-3 Q3, 13-3 Q4
Pitt: RPI 39, 10-13 Q1, 4-2 Q2, 7-9 Q3, 12-0 Q4
They got swept at home by Cal and lost a home series to ND. Went 3-7 in ACC series. Have a hard time feeling strongly they should be in.
Mercer should have been in over either of them.
High point and Mercer should have been in over state and Kentucky
With the Avent news they can have a parade even if they go winless in the NCAAT!