m
me neither, they should all go to Big Ten...which has already passed the SEC in capability...
NAACP Calls on Black Athletes & Fans to Withhold Support of Public Schools in States Attacking Black Voting Rights
- Thread starter CRazzle
- Start date
Your mindset that blacks can only thrive or survive with Democrats trapping them in generational reliance of government is about the most awful thing you can think about a group of people. The sad part is you don't even stop to think about how awful your opinion of them is.
Essentially you and the others like you believe that blacks should all be corralled together so they can "freely vote" for only the people you want them to vote for...because only you and your white friends know what's best for them.
There are several examples of blacks being elected to represent white districts but because those blacks are Republican, you see that as "oppression of the black vote". Blacks, who you demand only vote for the white Dem running against a black GOPer because you have decided they're not smart enough to determine what is best for them. Holy hell, you people are effed up.
A single black athlete threatening to transfer got Mississippi to change it's state flag.
Mississippi State RB Kylin Hill 'won't represent the state' until Mississippi flag is changed
Good lord this is some stupid ****.
Exactly HOW does them being "corralled together" affect who they can freely vote for? I seriously want an answer to that question. Again, you think they are too stupid to know what's in their own best interests so they need to be true minorities in GOP districts where the white man will take care of them. You are sounding racist AF.
I don't "demand" **** from black voters, racist. Unlike you, I think they should be able to pick their own representatives. And a black Republican in a white district does not a single thing to "oppress the black vote"... that is some truly top-shelf stupidity. It makes no sense in any context.
Could it be because the gerrymandering that the Republicans are engaged in throughout Red State America is ALL ABOUT race, even as they claim (in amusingly hypocritical fashion) that what they are doing is putting an end to race based districting? I think it is.
Who knew that carving up Memphis (which is 64% black) into multiple oddly shaped voting districts with the objective of diluting black voting power so as to make Tennessee's congressional delegation 100% Republican (and white) was "putting an end to race based districting?"
You're so open about your racism, but a tad closeted about being gay. Why not just come out and level things up? It's not like we can't tell from your ceaseless posting about gay and trans themes. You can do it, sailor!
To be clear, I'm not a fan of these recent gerrymandering efforts, and I don't begrudge anyone the option of a boycott as a response to them one bit. But we're a 50/50 society, which means there are plenty of white people (certainly white liberals, perhaps even some white conservatives, and in any case probably more than there are black people) that are aligned with them on that.
My point is simply this - if you want to suggest a boycott, have at it, but do so in a way that maximizes its impact. Unless you're really just doing it for performative reasons, which is certainly a possibility given that it's May rather than NCAA kickoff week in the south.
National Association for the Advancement of African American Persons (re: the thread not whimsically noting a potential for an old white lady becoming offended by "colored")
YOU are the one saying their rights are being stripped and that they can only have them if they are segregated from the rest of the population. Dems getting back to their roots.
Your babble only works if YOU decide how they will vote. You don't want them to be free agents with free thought. You only want them to be a slam dunk vote for Dems. And you're losing it and you can't handle it...as demonstrated by your next coment.
See? I've done nothing but advocate for them being allowed to be free to make decisions based on their own individual situations not their skin color. And you, the person who believes "they are all alike" think I'm the one being racist. What a POS you are. Seriously.
Here's one for you...70% of blacks support Voter ID. Go ahead and tell us all how those blacks don't know what they're saying and you need to save them from themselves. Again, it's so dehumanizing the way you treat them. I've dedicated my life to helping black kids and their families. It's priority number one for me. And if they read this crap you are saying about them, they would be appalled and so insulted by your partisan patronizing of them.
So many black Republicans out there. Let's see, there's Condoleeza Rice, Clarence Thomas, that crazy talking head from ESPN, Kanye West, some other, obscure rapper dude. Who else? There must be at least 5-10 more black Republicans. Oh, wait. I forgot Senator Oreo.
Take a look at this picture. Guess which three people the Dems and the NAACP supported in their elections. I don't give a crap who they vote for. I also am not going to assume that their own personal individual situation is the exact same as everyone else who shares their skin color like you and the left does.
'I've dedicated my life to helping black kids and their families' does in fact come across racist af. Ironic, as you called the other posters messaging 'patronizing' and your Lil phrase there is incredibly patronizing to the Black community.
Further, if you were in the south and went on your Lil diatribe calling Black people 'blacks' like you did repeatedly, you would get your a ss beat in a second. Black people or the Black community is acceptable. Also, always capitalize the B in Black.
Maybe you should actually talk to Black people and engage with them on their terms and what they prefer, because you seem completely out of touch with anything that's going on in the Black community currently. It's pretty obvious in just how you've been speaking about their community.
Clearly you care about this stuff- so do better.
Memphis is >60% black. That IS their population. It has been carved into multiple white districts. YOU are the one "segregating them from the rest of the population", racist.
More stupidity. They DO vote Dem. Of their own free will. Only a racist would think they're too dumb to vote in their own best interests. But that's your problem, isn't it. You can't control their vote so you'll just silence it.
LOL... sure... they can be "free to make decisions" as long as those decisions are meaningless. Racist.
And I'll bet you have "black friends", too. That's the usual racist canard.
How many white liberal voters are playing D-1 college football, or being recruited to do so?
"Accomplishments in the rear view mirror?" I'd say being the next Speaker of the House is an accomplishment. We only need wait a few more months for that. And if the NAACP could persuade some black athletes to pick Oregon, or Michigan, or Penn State or USC (or Cal, even) over an SEC school, I submit THAT would be an accomplishment. If more than a few black athletes do so, it will send a message. Look how exercised MAGA world is over the mere proposal for a boycott. And speaking of boycotts, how long has it been since you had a Bud Light or watched an NFL game? (Those frickin' kneelers are traitors, I tells 'ya!)
OK, I get that. In which case, all you needed was quotation marks around the stand alone "a" in the latter portion of your post.
The boycott is not simply seeking athletes to boycott universities in recruiting. it is also seeking a boycott of fans, families, etc. Again, white people have eyeballs, asses, and wallets as well. (Oddly, it would not surprise me if the athlete part is the least effective, given the process of becoming a D1 prospect.)
Last edited:
Winsome Earle-Sears. What an idiot. She makes that apparent each time she opens her mouth in public. For example:
- LGBTQ+ Rights & Workplace Discrimination: During a gubernatorial debate, Sears explicitly stated that opposing same-sex marriage and firing someone from their job for being gay does not constitute discrimination. She previously included a handwritten note on a legislative bill stating she was "morally opposed" to marriage equality.
- Abortion and Reproductive Rights: During her campaigns, Sears has taken hardline anti-abortion stances. She has referred to abortion as "genocide", expressed support for strict heartbeat bans, and claimed women should "make our choices before we're pregnant".
- Public Education & Race: Sears sparked fierce debate when she asserted that the landmark Supreme Court decision in Brown vs. Board of Education
"was never about sending Black children to white schools", but rather about "parents being able to decide where to send their children".
Last edited:
So I went back and looked at that the "Out of Bounds" message from the NAACP that the OP linked. It does, in fact, ask Black American "families, alumni and fans" to withhold their financial support from a select group of SEC schools, but the clear focus of that message is on Black athletes. And that is the portion of the message that provoked expressions of outrage from Red Staters and Republicans in general. What portion of the total financial support received by the schools in question comes from Black Americans? It doesn't take a scholar to figure out that the portion is relatively miniscule.
I happen to agree with your suggestion that the boycott will likely be unsuccessful, if the sole metric is how many prominent black recruits announce that they are picking a blue state school over one of these SEC schools because of the NAACP's call for an athlete boycott. People aged 18 or so tend to be FAR less politically motivated (or politically informed) than people who are 40 and over. And young athletes being recruited are inevitably going to be MUCH more focused on their own welfare than sending some kind of political message.
But if the NAACP said NOTHING, consider how much lower the odds are that a prominent black recruit might even CONSIDER the issue of how the state whose university he is considering treats its black voters? The proposed boycott is thought provoking, and I welcome it for that reason alone. That, and the fact that it has provoked splutters of outrage in MAGA World.
Did you ask Franisdaman for permission to use his red? He gets really bitchy when you use it.
from what I've read, one of the leading candidates in the "black" district currently represented by a white male, is a Republican black woman. Of course election is a long away
I don't make policy. And quite frankly, neither does the NAACP. I am merely commenting on that acts of some people that provoked the NAACP's call for a boycott, and on the likely effect of that boycott.
Your question would be more useful if it was directed to Donald Trump or the leaders of some of these Red States.
Have you ever talked to people of color about why race matters so much?
What district? Memphis? That district no longer exists so it doesn't matter what the people of Memphis want - they will be represented by multiple people. They couldn't elect a Republican black woman even if they wanted to.
CNN, Dodo. And it's 76%. Let me know if you need help moving the goalposts on your next post.
The rest of your drivel is too dumb to deal with. Especially the part where I was called racist then you told me I shouldn't call people names when I responded to being called that. But now's your chance to go back and get that other guy who called me a name first! Go get him!
Funny. I just googled "CNN Black Voter ID polling" and it came up with many other links. But maybe you can answer the question now. Are these blacks wrong and you know what's best for them? Or is it OK for them to have an opinion about their own capabilities? You've already shown that you disapprove of them voting for black non-Dems. Maybe you can approve of them saying they're OK with having to provide an ID.
Oh geesh. You're one of those hey? You read all that and came away thinking I have an issue with boycotts and not grown political adults using kids as their political pawns, asking them to sacrifice their current success. Wow.
If the poll question were more honest it would be "Do you support voter ID that requires a birth certificate or passport to obtain, and with the voter ID comes the new increased voter purges that can come down on the request of the federal government from data the feds collected from state voter rolls. If you are purged from the rolls because you were flagged by the federal government for having a name similar to someone else you would need to reregister with your birth certificate or passport. The voter purges also will not be announced so you will need to check on your status frequently. If you are a married woman you will need to have proper documentation from your name change after our wedding because if your marital name doesn't match your birth certificate you will not be able to be confirmed to vote."
Because you guys are using these misleading polls to support the SAVE Act.
Funny you started and ended with those two sentences because I couldn't care less about the SAVE Act. In this thread the conversation I am commenting fully on is white liberals (like the ones in this thread) explaining to blacks why they shouldn't have faith in themselves to be able to do the most simplest of tasks and they need Dems to save them from having to do them. And right on cue they don't disappoint.
Anyway, I'm tired of these back and forths with people not wanting to have direct conversations and inventing strawmen that no one is talking about. and that's not referring to you.
You are using the same polling that people pushing the SAVE Act use. You are doing the lifting for maga whether you are aware or not. I think you probably are aware, but you are a snake.
I was asked for a link to show it and the dope accused me of getting it from FOX. So I showed him that. From CNN. Proving him a dope. What is it you want?
Wait a minute. Aren't you one of those MAGA cultists who is always caterwauling about those poor kids who are subjected to the continual risk of assault from male to female trannies who invade the ladies' room when those kids are in there? If you have a daughter (and assuming you have progeny is a stretch), you likely accompany her to the ladies' room, "just in case," no? Maybe, like your Orange Master, you can get a look around while you're in there doing God's work. Talk about using kids as your pawns.
I guess when someone is moderate to conservative they forget that Indiana is the current king of college football. Probably shouldn't have happened since they aren't a "top school".
Listen, White Liberals absolutely are virtue signaling warriors. However, once again, your post is dripping with condescension towards the Black community. If you really think the "Dems" have set up a slow drip for the Black community to leech off the government to buy their votes, you are inherently removing their choices and their personhood. That line is decades old, and is simply untrue for the Black community. You only hear that line/idea in white conservative spaces. Be better.
For all their virtue signaling, Liberals learned a long time ago that "explaining" things to the Black community will never work, and more, it's inherently f ucked up and wrong. They don't need ANYTHING 'explained' to them, and I promise you they don't want to be white-splained from liberals. They want to be heard and understood, 2 things you refuse to do. You are still referencing them as "blacks" which, again, would get your a ss beaten if you referred to their community in such a manner to their face.
You simply don't know what you're talking about but you certainly are talking like you do. I'd let this one go if I were you- you're ignorant and outclassed in this conversation.