Who do you want to see win the QB battle?

Who do you want to see win the QB battle?

  • Heck

    Votes: 55 84.6%
  • Hank

    Votes: 10 15.4%

  • Total voters
    65

2D

All-American
Oct 8, 2013
2,631
5,457
113
Fixed it for you.
I would ignore that worthless loser. I actually made a custom CSS code to outright remove his posts and the "show ignored" button on the website. So now I'll never see his posts again. Knowing his uneducated stupidity is officially gone from my view feels very freeing.

If anyone wants a guide on how to hide Eyes of Retard's posts completely, let me know!
 

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
2,194
2,482
113
I would ignore that worthless loser. I actually made a custom CSS code to outright remove his posts and the "show ignored" button on the website. So now I'll never see his posts again. Knowing his uneducated stupidity is officially gone from my view feels very freeing.

If anyone wants a guide on how to hide Eyes of Retard's posts completely, let me know!
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

Holy ****!

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: JerseyCityHawk

HMB Trumpet

Senior
Mar 19, 2018
424
512
93
My personal take is that these are very different players with different playing styles. I think Brown and pocket passer types are no longer a schematic fit for Iowa. His type worked in the old pro style offense, but it really isn't a good fit in the new Shanahan RPO scheme. Hecklinksi is a better fit for the new scheme.

Last year I had a chance to attend a semi-private Q&A with some donors (I was a guest) and Kirk after summer open practice. Someone asked Kirk about the QB position last year, and Kirk played coy, as usual, and said it was a fluid situation, changes every day, all guys have their strengths, blah, blah, blah.

But I do remember him then giving the following unsolicited assessment: "You know, Hank Brown is a really interesting player..." My interpretation of that comment was that Hank Brown looks like the protypical tall pocket passer type that Kirk has always liked to put under center for 25+ years. When Brown was at Auburn some fans worried about his lack of mobility, and I don't think his style has really changed much but I could be wrong.

QB skills will drive scheme and playcalling at the end of the day. I like the RPO heavy scheme we ran with Gronk, and I want the QB who can best keep that going. I hope Hecklinksi performs well enough in the camps to earn the starting job.
IIRC, Lester said that Brown had good mobility and decent speed going around the edges. He was not a power, up-the-middle guy like Gronowski. Lester recruited Brown to Iowa, and I don't think he would have done so if Brown weren't a good fit for his system. (Of course, that's not to say Hecklinski isn't a better fit.)

Let's be clear, too, that pocket passers can work fine in an RPO. The R part of that does not necessarily entail the QB running; it more often means handing off to the RB. What doesn't work well anymore are guys who have poor mobility and can't at least run occasionally.
 

r_desihawk

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
2,460
3,587
112
Your post has nothing to do with what Alum was talking about.

It also has no real relevance, as only one qb can play at a time. And Iowa has had qb's on the field during the BF tenure you mention, good enough to be part of KF''s winningest stretch at Iowa.

What you say also has no relevance, as over 26 years, Iowa has won about the same number of games, regardless of what their qb was like.

And it's also irrelevant, as qb play hasn't been rated very high by fans for much of KF's 26 year hall of fame career.

Also, to imply the qb situation you mentioned was BF's fault, is a mischaracterization. A shaky year of recruiting, from a coordinator, would fall on that coordinator. But multiple years of shaky recruiting would fall directly on KF. So again, we see the silliness and illegitimacy of complaints about a hall of fame coach.

Sullivan was a Lester recruit. Why was he not the "first step in the right direction"? Only the ripest cherries
not speaking for your nemesis but i would definitely say brendan sullivan was a step in the right direction — he completely turned around the ref zone offense for the better. second lester joined iowa in spring 2024 and signed brendan soon thereafter. considering where we were and the compressed time solid pickup despite later shortcomings.
 

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
2,194
2,482
113
not speaking for your nemesis but i would definitely say brendan sullivan was a step in the right direction — he completely turned around the ref zone offense for the better. second lester joined iowa in spring 2024 and signed brendan soon thereafter. considering where we were and the compressed time solid pickup despite later shortcomings.
For sure.

Was more pushing back on 2Dense's logic and exposing his framing
 
  • Like
Reactions: JerseyCityHawk

2D

All-American
Oct 8, 2013
2,631
5,457
113
not speaking for your nemesis but i would definitely say brendan sullivan was a step in the right direction — he completely turned around the ref zone offense for the better. second lester joined iowa in spring 2024 and signed brendan soon thereafter. considering where we were and the compressed time solid pickup despite later shortcomings.
Frankly, I forgot Sullivan even existed. He started about 5 games and then left. It's still in line with what I originally said though, Lester knows what to look for. Eyes of Retard's personal lord and savior, Brian, did not. It's no coincidence the first two guys Lester brought in, Brendan and Mark, were big improvements over what we saw prior.

But we all know Eyes of Retard doesn't know anything about football, or sports on general. Luckily I don't have to read his lies anymore either.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: eyesofhawk

Iron Doc

Senior
Nov 5, 2005
653
969
93
Frankly, I forgot Sullivan even existed. He started about 5 games and then left. It's still in line with what I originally said though, Lester knows what to look for. Eyes of Retard's personal lord and savior, Brian, did not. It's no coincidence the first two guys Lester brought in, Brendan and Mark, were big improvements over what we saw prior.

But we all know Eyes of Retard doesn't know anything about football, or sports on general. Luckily I don't have to read his lies anymore either.
I struggled for some time with the concept of ignoring ol' eyes.
It seemed to me that my ignoring him was a defeat.
After giving the matter thought, I came to accept the fact that he, like roaches surviving a nuclear holocaust, would never acknowledge being in error, nor go away off into the sunset.
In addition, he had the (pathological?) tenacity of a pitbull.

Bottom Line:
I concur with those that have finally ignored/blocked ol' eyes, and did likewise.
I strongly suspect ol' eyes is a teacher/coach, past or present.
However in 40+ years in education, I have NEVER encountered the likes of him.

He DID serve one purpose; he made me READ BETTER!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: eyesofhawk and 2D

2D

All-American
Oct 8, 2013
2,631
5,457
113
I struggled for some time with the concept of ignoring ol' eyes.
It seemed to me that my ignoring him was a defeat.
After giving the matter thought, I came to accept the fact that he, like roaches surviving a nuclear holocaust, would never acknowledge being in error, nor go away off into the sunset.
In addition, he had the (pathological?) tenacity of a pitbull.

Bottom Line:
I concur with those that have finally ignored/blocked ol' eyes, and did likewise.
I strongly suspect ol' eyes is a teacher/coach, past or present.
However in 40+ years in education, I have NEVER encountered the likes of him.

He DID serve one purpose; he made me READ BETTER!
I stopped speaking to him when he admitted he was here to only correct fans. He isnt here in good faith, meaning he never posts in good faith. Once I realized that I felt a lot better not responding to him. Decided to remove the temptation of looking at his ignored posts by using the Chrome browser extension called Stylus, and I made a small code to remove his posts and the "show ignored" button. Now I'm really free. The only person that loses in the situation where you ignore him, is Eyes himself. I just want to talk about Iowa sports, not argue about nothing with an egomaniac.
 

MeetTheFerentzes

All-Conference
Sep 6, 2022
1,923
3,790
113
I have no real preference as to who wins the starting job out of fall camp. As far as my "QB wishes" go, they would go like this:

1) QB1 is the clear QB1 and proves it all season.

2) QB2 is prepared to play, because we all know that he will be needed at some point - Iowa has needed the backup QB to play significant and/or critical minutes every season since 2022; B Sully and Stratton were quality, prepared QB's; the others ranged from rather poor to disasters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HMB Trumpet

hawksfan2025

Junior
Jul 4, 2025
237
276
63
Obviously the best one.

I want a qb who makes good decisions, is mobile (and I don’t mean a running qb), is able to complete a high percentage of his passes, and can move the chains.

Hopefully that man is on campus.
I'd consider becoming a fan of a different team....

Personally I'm ready to be disappointed again.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: 83Hawk

hawksfan2025

Junior
Jul 4, 2025
237
276
63
What's the definition of "great"?
Mobile, doesn't freeze up, doesn't overthrow massively, actually gets developed enough to get drafted as a starting QB in the NFL.
Brad Banks, Drew Tate, Ricky Stanzi, and CJ Beathard all say hello. Jeez, Beathard is still in the NFL. We've had some pretty great QBs under Ferentz.
Beathard hasn't played in a game in a couple years.
 

WeBeHerkin

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2016
4,277
4,940
113
Mobile, doesn't freeze up, doesn't overthrow massively, actually gets developed enough to get drafted as a starting QB in the NFL.

Beathard hasn't played in a game in a couple years.
I want hard stats not adjectives. What stats are "great" college QB stats?