Rutgers doesn’t win enough because most of you don’t donate enough

rurx1228

All-Conference
Feb 14, 2016
3,118
4,332
88
We're relocating to Leland. There's a place called Pizzettas, which actually has pizza that doesn't suck. we are there Thursday & I was pleasantly surprised
On Saturday we got to have dinner with 2 sets of Rutgers friends who live in the area. We're starting the Wilmington Area Rutgers Club. 😁
Keep us updated on the Wilmington Club, we are moving to Southport
 
  • Love
Reactions: MrsScrew

MrsScrew

All-Conference
Jan 17, 2023
638
1,436
93
Keep us updated on the Wilmington Club, we are moving to Southport

When are you moving? Our plan is to be there in Feb/March next year. Southport is such a cute little Hallmark town!

There is at least one other board poster who lives in Leland ...his handle escapes me at the moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rurx1228

rurx1228

All-Conference
Feb 14, 2016
3,118
4,332
88
When are you moving? Our plan is to be there in Feb/March next year. Southport is such a cute little Hallmark town!

There is at least one other board poster who lives in Leland ...his handle escapes me at the moment.
Our house was done in Feb, NJ house will go up for sale in June/July then it’s Sayonara
 
  • Love
Reactions: MrsScrew
Jun 7, 2001
36,142
43,498
113
UCLA will be good in a few years and all we will hear is that they spent $175 million on Nil, not about how the new right coach can invigorate a program



In recent years, we could count on beating MSU.

MSU just received $401M in NIL and other support. It is going to be very difficult for us to compete going forward without adequate support.

 
Jun 7, 2001
36,142
43,498
113
Apparently his strategy of attempting to be a leader is to be an annoyance. You can tell he never played competitive sports at any real level. It is any surprise he can't get a date and is so desperate he looks for help on a message board?

Facts never were your strength. I’ve played plenty of sports, and currently play 1st base for our softball team in a Central Park Church League.

Big Ten alumni have started a softball league with Big Ten alumni teams. Michigan has two teams. Rutgers doesn’t even have one. Someone asked me to start a team for Rutgers, but i declined. Just mentioning this in case anyone is interested..
 
Jun 7, 2001
36,142
43,498
113
Actually he doesn't. He was getting great support relative to conference foes of the past, yet still never won anything of consequence. He's just not a winner. Forget beating Michigan and Ohio St. The problem is he can't compete with teams with more than. Fine. But he gets outcoached by teams he's equivalent to. The only teams he beats are the ones he has more then. And then not always.

He's just not a good coach, as his record states. He's a builder and an organizer. When that is no longer needed, he's no longer needed.

What does he lack that everyone else has, MONEY! It’s not a coincidence that he recruited very well at Miami, recruited very well at OSU, and his recruiting at Rutgers has been towards the bottom of the Big Ten in recent years.

The teams he beats are the teams who have similar support to us. I’d bet there is a direct relationship between CAPEX spend + OPEX spend + NIL, and recruiting results.

Cristobal is the exact same type of coach and is succeeding because of the financial support.
 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
196,692
148,790
113
Facts never were your strength. I’ve played plenty of sports, and currently play 1st base for our softball team in a Central Park Church League.

Big Ten alumni have started a softball league with Big Ten alumni teams. Michigan has two teams. Rutgers doesn’t even have one. Someone asked me to start a team for Rutgers, but i declined. Just mentioning this in case anyone is interested..
Like I said, at any real level. Church softball league lol. Go get em Shohei.
 
Jun 7, 2001
36,142
43,498
113
Like I said, at any real level. Church softball league lol. Go get em Shohei.

You haven’t played Big Ten Football so you can’t relate. Big Ten Football attracts the most money and best players by far. So much for your real level.

I played plenty of high school sports like most people but that isn’t relevant, because it’s not going to fix our lack of competitiveness.

The only thing that’s going to fix the competitive gap between Rutgers and Nebraska/Wisconsin/Iowa/Penn State is money.

Because at our present level, of support, it’s going to be tough to be more than mediocre.
 

knightfan7

Heisman
Jul 30, 2003
95,819
69,663
113
Like I said, at any real level. Church softball league lol. Go get em Shohei.
Did you see your MD bro Espenshade shot a 4 Under 66 in the final round of the B1G Championship, leading a charge by RU that leapfrogged 4 teams and finished 4th. That's their best finish since joining the B1G.

He finished 9th, the best finish by a RU mens golfer since 2019.
 

LotusAggressor_rivals

All-American
Oct 11, 2003
16,197
8,019
113
UCLA will be good in a few years and all we will hear is that they spent $175 million on Nil, not about how the new right coach can invigorate a program


If Chesney suceeds at UCLA at anywhere near the level that Cignetti has at Indiana, serious heat is going to be applied to the seats of a lot of underachieving coaches.

It's amazing how fast the Indiana narrative changed. It went from "Mr I win Google me is going to get smashed in the B1G" to "They're undefeated, but they haven't played anybody" to "They were a fluke, they lost to Ohio State and Notre Dame because they don't belong on the same field with those teams. Alabama should have made the playoffs instead" to "The only reason they were undefeated and won a National Championship is because a billionaire shoveled loads of cash into the program so that they could buy a team of All Americans" Can't make this stuff up.
 

Scarlet4ever

All-American
Feb 14, 2004
8,819
7,060
98
In recent years, we could count on beating MSU.

MSU just received $401M in NIL and other support. It is going to be very difficult for us to compete going forward without adequate support.

If that's what it takes to field a competitive team then I'm all for RU sucking at sports for the foreseeable future. If we are following professional sports, I will follow professional sports where salaries and other player revenue is coming from endorsements, ticket sales, and tv contracts not the average fan's pockets or from some sugar daddy.
 
Aug 11, 2025
521
419
63
If Chesney suceeds at UCLA at anywhere near the level that Cignetti has at Indiana, serious heat is going to be applied to the seats of a lot of underachieving coaches.

It's amazing how fast the Indiana narrative changed. It went from "Mr I win Google me is going to get smashed in the B1G" to "They're undefeated, but they haven't played anybody" to "They were a fluke, they lost to Ohio State and Notre Dame because they don't belong on the same field with those teams. Alabama should have made the playoffs instead" to "The only reason they were undefeated and won a National Championship is because a billionaire shoveled loads of cash into the program so that they could buy a team of All Americans" Can't make this stuff up.
The likelihood of IU going undefeated again is very high. Their toughest game, a suspect OSU team is at home, a pathetic OOC schedule schiano would approve of and a rebuilding Michigan on the road. (if OSU goes to Austin and gets smoked, then IU may have an even easier road to the #1 seed)
 

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,146
12,939
113
If that's what it takes to field a competitive team then I'm all for RU sucking at sports for the foreseeable future. If we are following professional sports, I will follow professional sports where salaries and other player revenue is coming from endorsements, ticket sales, and tv contracts not the average fan's pockets or from some sugar daddy.

The irony is People blame the players and NIL.

If there was no NIL, we would be right back to:
"Rutgers doesn't win enough because fans won't donate to the AD enough. We need a fieldhouse. Increased recruiting budget. Better weight room. Upgrade locker room."

Find and replace all of Al's posts with "NIL" with "fieldhouse".

Unfortunately, its the foundation of college atheltics - funding comes from average fans pockets.

Which seemed to be fine when college atheltics was actually "small time" 40 years ago.
But now that conferences have $1b media contracts and schools receive $75m in conference payouts?
Hard to blame the fans for not covering all the ever increasing AD spending.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newell138

LotusAggressor_rivals

All-American
Oct 11, 2003
16,197
8,019
113
The irony is People blame the players and NIL.

If there was no NIL, we would be right back to:
"Rutgers doesn't win enough because fans won't donate to the AD enough. We need a fieldhouse. Increased recruiting budget. Better weight room. Upgrade locker room."

Find and replace all of Al's posts with "NIL" with "fieldhouse".

Unfortunately, its the foundation of college atheltics - funding comes from average fans pockets.

Which seemed to be fine when college atheltics was actually "small time" 40 years ago.
But now that conferences have $1b media contracts and schools receive $75m in conference payouts?
Hard to blame the fans for not covering all the ever increasing AD spending.
I would think that the school's share of these billion dollar media contract payouts would alleviate the need to soak fans for money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newell138

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
196,692
148,790
113
I would think that the school's share of these billion dollar media contract payouts would alleviate the need to soak fans for money.
Al is right in one way, the schools that win big have fan/corporate/conference payout money. We have conference money, but that is about it. The corporate side and fan engagement is getting better. We simply don't have the right coach though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tico brown

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,146
12,939
113
I would think that the school's share of these billion dollar media contract payouts would alleviate the need to soak fans for money.

You would think, right?

Imagine going back 20 years when we were getting a couple million and saying "Rutgers will be receiving over $75m per year just in conference revenue. But it still won't be enough and fans will need to subsidize a fieldhouse and everything else still."
 

Fat Koko

All-Conference
Nov 28, 2022
3,799
3,194
73
Al is right in one way, the schools that win big have fan/corporate/conference payout money. We have conference money, but that is about it. The corporate side and fan engagement is getting better. We simply don't have the right coach though.
Rutgers does get corporate money.

Rutgers gets tens of millions of corporate dollars from SHI and Jersey Mike's for naming rights. Michigan won the national basketball championship without a naming rights deal to its arena, and Indiana won the national football championship without a naming rights deal to its stadium. Though Indiana has since sold naming rights to its football field.

Rutgers just did a naming rights deal for the soccer stadium too. Michigan and Indiana don't have naming rights deals for their soccer stadiums.

Plus, the information posted on TKR suggests companies are stepping up to fund Rutgers football and basketball NIL, though visibility on this type of funding is less clear than the naming rights.
 
Last edited:

AreYouNUTS

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
123,621
57,691
113
You haven’t played Big Ten Football so you can’t relate. Big Ten Football attracts the most money and best players by far. So much for your real level.

I played plenty of high school sports like most people but that isn’t relevant, because it’s not going to fix our lack of competitiveness.

The only thing that’s going to fix the competitive gap between Rutgers and Nebraska/Wisconsin/Iowa/Penn State is money.

Because at our present level, of support, it’s going to be tough to be more than mediocre.
Dude, he played Division I college athletics. He knows 100x more about anything and everything related to college athletics than you know, ever have known or ever will know. Trust me….

….talk about “barking up the wrong tree” lol!
 
  • Love
Reactions: -RUFAN4LIFE-

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
196,692
148,790
113
Dude, he played Division I college athletics. He knows 100x more about anything and everything related to college athletics than you know, ever have known or ever will know. Trust me….

….talk about “barking up the wrong tree” lol!
He's the back up first baseperson in the church league. Put some respect on his name!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: newell138

AreYouNUTS

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
123,621
57,691
113
He's the back up first baseperson in the church league. Put some respect on his name!
My league has about 2 dozen guys who played college baseball, as well as a dozen or so girls D1 softball, so when I'm on the mound I'm in fear for my head - and my balls - quite often lolol!!!

But hey at least he's out there, honestly, the # of guys I know who do absolutely nothing athletically once they're over 35 is absolutely stunning. Good for you Al!!!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Caliknight

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
196,692
148,790
113
Rutgers does get corporate money.

Rutgers gets tens of millions of corporate dollars from SHI and Jersey Mike's for naming rights. Michigan won the national basketball championship without a naming rights deal to its arena, and Indiana won the national football championship without a naming rights deal to its stadium. Though Indiana has since sold naming rights to its football field.

Rutgers just did a naming rights deal for the soccer stadium too. Michigan and Indiana don't have naming rights deals for their soccer stadiums.

Plus, the information posted on TKR suggests companies are stepping up to fund Rutgers football and basketball NIL, though visibility on this type of funding is less clear than the naming rights.
Keli is doing yeoman's work on the corporate front.

Michigan has crazy sponsorship deals. See Nike to the tune of ~$175MM. See their "Athletic Campus" Ross paid $100MM to name. They don't monetize the Big House because of the deals they have generate so much revenue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fat Koko

Fat Koko

All-Conference
Nov 28, 2022
3,799
3,194
73
Keli is doing yeoman's work on the corporate front.

Michigan has crazy sponsorship deals. See Nike to the tune of ~$175MM. See their "Athletic Campus" Ross paid $100MM to name. They don't monetize the Big House because of the deals they have generate so much revenue.
Yeah on Zinn. In an interview out today, Pike was asked about the portal and he answered. "Pike said our number one portal acquisition was Keli Zinn."

Nobody seems to knows how much Rutgers is making on its BSN apparel deal. I learned several weeks ago from a good source this deal still has not been signed 16 months after it was announced, which seems unusual. Doubt Rutgers gets a 9-figure whale like Ross or Phil Knight or T Boone. Maybe the next football coach can find one to write a big check for the indoor practice palace.
 

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,748
19,034
113
You would think, right?

Imagine going back 20 years when we were getting a couple million and saying "Rutgers will be receiving over $75m per year just in conference revenue. But it still won't be enough and fans will need to subsidize a fieldhouse and everything else still."

20 years. You mean before NIL?
 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
196,692
148,790
113
Yeah on Zinn. In an interview out today, Pike was asked about the portal and he answered. "Pike said our number one portal acquisition was Keli Zinn."

Nobody seems to knows how much Rutgers is making on its BSN apparel deal. I learned several weeks ago from a good source this deal still has not been signed 16 months after it was announced, which seems unusual. Doubt Rutgers gets a 9-figure whale like Ross or Phil Knight or T Boone. Maybe the next football coach can find one to write a big check for the indoor practice palace.
That deal was signed, which is why we are in it. Keli did what she could for athletes to get higher end Nike apparel. It was a terrible thing prior to her arrival. The more that comes out about Hobbs, the worse his tenure looks. Keli has great relationships with Nike as she was the point person at LSU. Obviously our teams need to win, but as fans, buying Nike apparel will help out a lot too when it comes time to negotiate our next contract.
 
Jun 7, 2001
36,142
43,498
113
Dude, he played Division I college athletics. He knows 100x more about anything and everything related to college athletics than you know, ever have known or ever will know. Trust me….

….talk about “barking up the wrong tree” lol!

Right. That is why he has yet to add any value in a college football discussion. I doubt he can even name anyone on the football team. His hate for Schiano, because Mulcahy decided to fully fund football, and give lacrosse crumbs, which was the right decision, colors his comments. Enjoy his posts, I guess.
 
Jun 7, 2001
36,142
43,498
113
Yeah on Zinn. In an interview out today, Pike was asked about the portal and he answered. "Pike said our number one portal acquisition was Keli Zinn."

Nobody seems to knows how much Rutgers is making on its BSN apparel deal. I learned several weeks ago from a good source this deal still has not been signed 16 months after it was announced, which seems unusual. Doubt Rutgers gets a 9-figure whale like Ross or Phil Knight or T Boone. Maybe the next football coach can find one to write a big check for the indoor practice palace.

We get crumbs because we don’t buy apparel like other fanbases. Simply don’t have enough negotiating power.
 
Jun 7, 2001
36,142
43,498
113
You would think, right?

Imagine going back 20 years when we were getting a couple million and saying "Rutgers will be receiving over $75m per year just in conference revenue. But it still won't be enough and fans will need to subsidize a fieldhouse and everything else still."

Syracuse built a $100M Fieldhouse, despite not being in the Big Ten. Indiana spent $86M on football facilities improvements, and they are about to spend more. Penn State has spent a ton of money to improve football facilities. Maryland recently built a brand new facility. USC and Miami have plans on the drawing board, and are actively fundraising.

College football success is expensive, because it is an arms race, funded by wealthy donors.
 
Jun 7, 2001
36,142
43,498
113
Situational awareness, ability to adjust to game plans, an ability to produce a consistent and competent offense, and players who know where to play on the field?

And what’s the root cause for all these issues? Money. If we had kids who could block, tackle, and run, no one is complaining about these issues, which start with recruiting. USC spent $12-$13M on their freshmen class alone.

Where is the Anthony Davis or the Jeremy Zuttah type linemen that will spend years in the NFL? Not here. They took the bag and went to other schools. Michigan spent $4M on their freshmen QB last year.

We are not playing on a level field.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: newell138
Jun 7, 2001
36,142
43,498
113
The irony is People blame the players and NIL.

If there was no NIL, we would be right back to:
"Rutgers doesn't win enough because fans won't donate to the AD enough. We need a fieldhouse. Increased recruiting budget. Better weight room. Upgrade locker room."

Find and replace all of Al's posts with "NIL" with "fieldhouse".

Unfortunately, its the foundation of college atheltics - funding comes from average fans pockets.

Which seemed to be fine when college atheltics was actually "small time" 40 years ago.
But now that conferences have $1b media contracts and schools receive $75m in conference payouts?
Hard to blame the fans for not covering all the ever increasing AD spending.

Rutgers has never been sustainably successful because money has always been an issue.

You either spend money to be competitive or you accept adverse results. The Athletic Department is finally spending what it takes to be successful, but our investments in capital infrastructure and NIL are severely lacking, putting us at a big disadvantage on the recruiting trail.

Most funding comes from high rollers.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: newell138
Jun 7, 2001
36,142
43,498
113
If that's what it takes to field a competitive team then I'm all for RU sucking at sports for the foreseeable future. If we are following professional sports, I will follow professional sports where salaries and other player revenue is coming from endorsements, ticket sales, and tv contracts not the average fan's pockets or from some sugar daddy.

The NFL gets roughly 68% of its revenue from media sources. 17% from ticket sales.

College gets 35% of revenue from media, 24% of its revenue from donor contributions and 17% of its revenue from ticket sales.

It’s a different revenue model altogether, significantly dependent on donations. Rutgers is lacking in donor contributions which is why we struggle. Other schools get more in donations than ticket sales.

Everyone has a role to play.
The average fan is a consumer who is here to be entertained. Rutgers needs builders to invest in this football program so we can realize our potential.

Once the program/product is fully built, then it will be easier to attract corporate sponsorships. Honda and Ford spend significantly on Ohio State and Texas, for example.
 

Jerseylegends

All-Conference
Mar 15, 2023
1,641
1,732
113
The likelihood of IU going undefeated again is very high. Their toughest game, a suspect OSU team is at home, a pathetic OOC schedule schiano would approve of and a rebuilding Michigan on the road. (if OSU goes to Austin and gets smoked, then IU may have an even easier road to the #1 seed)
Just wondering why you say OSU is suspect? I'm assuming because of all the guys that left for the draft?