Only UCLA, Mississippi State, Florida and North Carolina clear every hurdle without being close on any metric.
It's saying every CWS champion since 2009 has passed each of those individual metrics, and those are the 14 teams left this season which are passing each of those metrics.Care to provide a little more insight into what you are saying?
What metrics? Why only 14 teams? The field will be 64 teams.
Help me.
They're right there in the table. No team has won the CWS without being above a certain threshold in those season-long metrics. We are one of only four schools left that have clearly met the criteria.Care to provide a little more insight into what you are saying?
What metrics? Why only 14 teams? The field will be 64 teams.
Help me.
Ok. I am at work and didn't see any table. I'll check on my phone.They're right there in the table. No team has won the CWS without being above a certain threshold in those season-long metrics. We are one of only four schools left that have clearly met the criteria.
I find it interesting that no champion since '09 has had more than a 4 game losing streak.They're right there in the table. No team has won the CWS without being above a certain threshold in those season-long metrics. We are one of only four schools left that have clearly met the criteria.
They will be a 2 seed to watch somewhere. Probably Auburn or Georgia, but could be in Starkville.Whoa. Watch out for Jacksonville State, ya’ll.
Probably because that's when the stats start to work. Fresno State in 2008 throws it off I bet.Whoa. Watch out for Jacksonville State, ya’ll.
Why does it only go back to 2009? That’s really not all that far.
Whoa. Watch out for Jacksonville State, ya’ll.
Why does it only go back to 2009? That’s really not all that far.
Probably because that's when the stats start to work. Fresno State in 2008 throws it off I bet.
Need to either go back to when the best of 3 finals started (which I believe was 2003), or only use 2015 and on (when the balls changed).
It’s UCLA’s to lose
Likely, and I think Georgia, is better than some stats seem to indicate.It’s UCLA’s to lose
I think I said this the day after we lost to them, we will see them in Omaha. I still believe we are destined to play them again.It’s UCLA’s to lose
That game felt to me like that first game against Texas in the beginning of 2021. Agree that I felt like we’d see them againI think I said this the day after we lost to them, we will see them in Omaha. I still believe we are destined to play them again.
UGA hits a ton but I'm not sold on their pitching. We just didn't hit **** that weekend. I didn't think their pitching staff was overly impressive. We've seen better, much better.Likely, and I think Georgia, is better than some stats seem to indicate.
They lead the league with a 18 - 6 record, They deserve more credit, than whatever the RPI says. And they solidly beat our ***, at our house.UGA hits a ton but I'm not sold on their pitching. We just didn't hit **** that weekend. I didn't think their pitching staff was overly impressive. We've seen better, much better.
Maybe so but TN solidly beat our *** too so there's that. They're good but they're not great and they're not winning it all. UCLA is far and away the best team and it's not close.They lead the league with a 18 - 6 record, They deserve more credit, than whatever the RPI says. And they solidly beat our ***, at our house.
They are currently #16, RPI, that is what I'm calling BS!.Maybe so but TN solidly beat our *** too so there's that. They're good but they're not great and they're not winning it all. UCLA is far and away the best team and it's not close.
I dint know. They’ve played 2 top 40 teams since the preseason tournament. A highly overrated USC team that 0-8 vs Q1 opponent that they swept. And #30 Santa Barbara who beat them 4-0. To call their schedule garbage is being kind. They’re a good team. But I think we can beat them.It’s UCLA’s to lose
There's no doubt we can... We had them beat if not for the combo of a wild bounce and the worst (or maybe second worst) umpire call against us all season. I'm not blaming it all on the umpire but we definitely could/should have won that damn game.I dint know. They’ve played 2 top 30 teams since the preseason tournament. A highly overrated USC team that 0-8 vs Q1 opponent that they swept. And #30 Santa Barbara who beat them 4-0. To call their schedule garbage is being kind. They’re a good team. But I think we can beat them.
They barely beat us, 8-7, in 10 innings at a neutral site with a wild pitch and a triple and we are in a tie for 4th in the SEC. So I don't see how they are an overwhelming favorite to win it all.It’s UCLA’s to lose
The following SEC teams STILL have not been to the SEC Championship in Atlanta:It's as valid as this one. View attachment 1284160
Going to be much harder to get there now that the top 2 teams of the 16 team conference (for now) qualify...The following SEC teams STILL have not been to the SEC Championship in Atlanta:
1) University of Mississippi
2) Vanderbilt
3) Kentucky
and the recent SEC members:
4) Texas A&M
5) Oklahoma
If we make Omaha I would rather have UCLA on my side than Georgia or Texas.It’s UCLA’s to lose
After 27 innings, they had beaten us by one run, and two runs, and tied us through regulation. No doubt winning all three on the road is a big deal, and they were better than us that weekend. But not sure that is "solidly beating our ***". Texas beat us by 2 runs and 5 runs while dropping a three run game against us. Had that been in Starkville, while the results of UGA were obviously better, I wouldn't say that UGA's was more of an *** whipping than UTs.They lead the league with a 18 - 6 record, They deserve more credit, than whatever the RPI says. And they solidly beat our ***, at our house.