Sankey is not the best negotiator

Cat_Man_Blue

All-Conference
Jan 5, 2003
1,803
1,573
113
Currently each B1G team makes 16.67 million more than each SEC team from TV revenue. The gap will widen in 2030 when the B1G TV deals are up for renegotiations. Keep in mind that the B1G averages 2.8 mil viewers per game, while the SEC averages 4.9 mil viewers per game. The SEC is locked into its current contrac until 2030.

 

Cat_Man_Blue

All-Conference
Jan 5, 2003
1,803
1,573
113
So he's comparing a deal fone 6 years ago vs a deal that was done last year.

Of course, the B1G contract will be bigger.

Duh
You are correct. However, the B1G deal was only for 5 years which gives the B1G another negotiating window 3 years before the SEC can get back to the table. Sankey's mistake was locking the SEC into a long term contract. If he was going to lock the SEC into a contract that doesn't expire until 2033, the contract shold have had periodic look ins for possible increases, based on performance. By the time the SEC gets back to the negotiating table, each B1G team will probably have earned somewhere between 100-150 mil more than each SEC team. I am not ok with that.
 

Johnnie Africa

All-Conference
Feb 27, 2003
919
2,923
93
Currently each B1G team makes 16.67 million more than each SEC team from TV revenue. The gap will widen in 2030 when the B1G TV deals are up for renegotiations. Keep in mind that the B1G averages 2.8 mil viewers per game, while the SEC averages 4.9 mil viewers per game. The SEC is locked into its current contrac until 2030.



Why would it widen in 2030 when the SEC deals are up for negotiation as well? That makes no sense.
 

Cat_Man_Blue

All-Conference
Jan 5, 2003
1,803
1,573
113
I was going by what the guy in the video said. If the SEC and the B1G both go back to the table in 2030, The SEC could potentialy even the score so to speak.
 

DudahUK

Heisman
Jul 23, 2020
7,321
11,570
113

theKybluedude

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
688
1,538
93
Bigger markets. Better nil cities. Better academics. Better monied alumni.
Tough for the sec to compete.
 

Johnnie Africa

All-Conference
Feb 27, 2003
919
2,923
93
Bigger markets. Better nil cities. Better academics. Better monied alumni.
Tough for the sec to compete.

According to the OP, SEC games get double the viewership so it actually should be very easy to compete with a TV contract. What you’re talking about is NIL and that I would agree with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: *Fox2Monk*

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
46,177
84,196
113
Currently each B1G team makes 16.67 million more than each SEC team from TV revenue. The gap will widen in 2030 when the B1G TV deals are up for renegotiations. Keep in mind that the B1G averages 2.8 mil viewers per game, while the SEC averages 4.9 mil viewers per game. The SEC is locked into its current contrac until 2030.


He needs to make the next SEC TV mega deal freaking massive if the viewers are like that.
 

BBPirate

Sophomore
Sep 17, 2011
607
103
38
Big 10 schools sponsor more sports and have higher travel costs due to how spread out the conference is. They may make more money per team, but they also need it. All things considered I doubt the gap is that much.
 

AllBall

All-American
May 5, 2015
4,887
6,425
93
You are correct. However, the B1G deal was only for 5 years which gives the B1G another negotiating window 3 years before the SEC can get back to the table. Sankey's mistake was locking the SEC into a long term contract. If he was going to lock the SEC into a contract that doesn't expire until 2033, the contract shold have had periodic look ins for possible increases, based on performance. By the time the SEC gets back to the negotiating table, each B1G team will probably have earned somewhere between 100-150 mil more than each SEC team. I am not ok with that.
Long term deals are just plain dumb. There's too much that can change causing teams and conferences to miss out on revenue. Keep it 3-4 yrs max. Things are fluid and you want negotiating leverage rather than being locked in hemorrhaging money.