Heels in the Polls - April 27 Week

UNC76

All-Conference
Jul 30, 2025
765
1,704
93
My guess is we will also remain at 2 in the coaches and NCBWA polls released later today, Bottom line is we have a top 10 matchup in Boshamer tomorrow night, Hopefully the season ticket holders will show up or get their tickets to UNC fans who will.

There are still some general admission tickets for sale in sec 116 and 117.
 

CoachQue

Senior
Aug 1, 2025
438
655
93
Just listened to a guy from D1 baseball on sirius gushing over GT. Taking the SEC to win it all still over the field.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mpaer

UNC76

All-Conference
Jul 30, 2025
765
1,704
93
As expected, we did stay at 2 in both the coaches and NCBWA polls. However, for the first time in 5 weeks, UCLA was not a unanimous #1 in the coaches poll. GT got a 1st place vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: frisson

TarHeelColby10

All-American
Jul 21, 2025
2,587
5,400
113
You get what you pay for.
I mean this isn’t entirely true, if you’re alluding to NIL. SEC programs have been committed to baseball for years upon years, but if you’re talking about the athletic budget going into the programs before NIL I agree. A lot of it is luck as well, not a chance on this earth this Mississippi teams had the best rosters money could buy those 2 years they won it. Recently though, I’d agree somewhat to the NIL figure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Heelium1

Heelium1

Junior
Aug 6, 2025
308
328
63
I mean this isn’t entirely true, if you’re alluding to NIL. SEC programs have been committed to baseball for years upon years, but if you’re talking about the athletic budget going into the programs before NIL I agree. A lot of it is luck as well, not a chance on this earth this Mississippi teams had the best rosters money could buy those 2 years they won it. Recently though, I’d agree somewhat to the NIL figure.
"Recently" is the period that I am describing. There are outliers, however. Bianco's Ole Miss teams and Gary Gilmore's Coastal Carolina squad are among them.

Before "recently," at least back to 2003, when I started again to pay serious attention to college baseball, the preliminary match-ups determined the eventual CWS participants, and those match-ups were made--almost entirely in private--by "a Committee," which consisted of a number of athletic directors, whose method of selection was also not disclosed.

A number of those athletic directors hailed from places like Fullerton. That did not become clear to me until I attended the CWS in 2006. What is still not clear is whether a college's success in Omaha led to selection of its athletic director to that Committee, or just the opposite.

It probably was initially the first, and then it became too irresistible not to be the second. The Omaha regulars all knew to expect Fullerton annually.

The 2006 CWS was a defining moment in many ways. Four ACC teams (Carolina, GA Tech, Clemson and Miami) made the field, which was the first time that had occurred. And the SEC was shocked. Not just the then baseball powers, like LSU and Miss. State, but everyone.

And, since then, the SEC, with a big "blind assist" from ESPN, has simply grabbed college baseball by the ears and, by hook or by crook, made itself the feature of college baseball.

There are, of course, exceptions. And Carolina is one of those. That fortunate circumstance also originated in 2006--at the Tuscaloosa Super Regional--an event that the Heels were supposed to lose.

But they won handily instead. And the ensuing run in Omaha, through 2013, made Carolina an undeniable fixture in the college baseball landscape.
 
Last edited:

Rockheel1650

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
898
1,261
93
I mean this isn’t entirely true, if you’re alluding to NIL. SEC programs have been committed to baseball for years upon years, but if you’re talking about the athletic budget going into the programs before NIL I agree. A lot of it is luck as well, not a chance on this earth this Mississippi teams had the best rosters money could buy those 2 years they won it. Recently though, I’d agree somewhat to the NIL figure.
The warmer weather has also been a big benefit - just like the southwest
 
  • Like
Reactions: TarHeelColby10

unc80

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2009
1,802
2,965
113
Just listened to a guy from D1 baseball on sirius gushing over GT. Taking the SEC to win it all still over the field.
Those D1 guys just can't get over GT. Even though UNC took them in the series and looked like the better team doing it, D1 can't get away from those sexy offensive numbers. Not saying GT isn't a great team. They are. But I'd rather have better pitching and defense, paired with a good offense and UNC does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4d4evr and premn

CoachQue

Senior
Aug 1, 2025
438
655
93
Those D1 guys just can't get over GT. Even though UNC took them in the series and looked like the better team doing it, D1 can't get away from those sexy offensive numbers. Not saying GT isn't a great team. They are. But I'd rather have better pitching and defense, paired with a good offense and UNC does.
100%
 
  • Like
Reactions: premn

premn

All-Conference
Aug 1, 2025
1,189
1,757
113
GT seem vulnerable the same way they’ve been in the past—if another team comes into the regional with hot hitting they also going to be able to hit HRs in their ballpark. We saw them not be able to leave the yard in chapel hill, especially in that first game there were a few fly outs they seemed to think we HRs off the bat. Their starting pitching seems to be trending down, which is not good.
 

mpaer

All-Conference
Jul 1, 2025
2,282
2,922
113
Those D1 guys just can't get over GT. Even though UNC took them in the series and looked like the better team doing it, D1 can't get away from those sexy offensive numbers. Not saying GT isn't a great team. They are. But I'd rather have better pitching and defense, paired with a good offense and UNC does.
Those D1 guys just can't get over GT. Even though UNC took them in the series and looked like the better team doing it, D1 can't get away from those sexy offensive numbers. Not saying GT isn't a great team. They are. But I'd rather have better pitching and defense, paired with a good offense and UNC does.
I just want to be top 8
 
  • Like
Reactions: premn and CCHeel1

4d4evr

Senior
Jun 30, 2025
811
813
93
"Recently" is the period that I am describing. There are outliers, however. Bianco's Ole Miss teams and Gary Gilmore's Coastal Carolina squad are among them.

Before "recently," at least back to 2003, when I started again to pay serious attention to college baseball, the preliminary match-ups determined the eventual CWS participants, and those match-ups were made--almost entirely in private--by "a Committee," which consisted of a number of athletic directors, whose method of selection was also not disclosed.

A number of those athletic directors hailed from places like Fullerton. That did not become clear to me until I attended the CWS in 2006. What is still not clear is whether a college's success in Omaha led to selection of its athletic director to that Committee, or just the opposite.

It probably was initially the first, and then it became too irresistible not to be the second. The Omaha regulars all knew to expect Fullerton annually.

The 2006 CWS was a defining moment in many ways. Four ACC teams (Carolina, GA Tech, Clemson and Miami) made the field, which was the first time that had occurred. And the SEC was shocked. Not just the then baseball powers, like LSU and Miss. State, but everyone.

And, since then, the SEC, with a big "blind assist" from ESPN, has simply grabbed college baseball by the ears and, by hook or by crook, made itself the feature of college baseball.

There are, of course, exceptions. And Carolina is one of those. That fortunate circumstance also originated in 2006--at the Tuscaloosa Super Regional--an event that the Heels were supposed to lose.

But they won handily instead. And the ensuing run in Omaha, through 2013, made Carolina an undeniable fixture in the college baseball landscape.
remember watching that 2006 game with the UNC win. What a moment...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tvilleheel