I like you Cowboy and the way you respectfully post, but If by bench coach you mean making tactical decisions I have to disagree. Neither guy is considered great at making in-game adjustments, but besides watching Pearl I’ve also sat directly behind the Auburn bench and been able to mainly hear everything Pearl said (when talking only a little louder than one-on-one normal conversation level). From my experience, Pearl is a cheerleader on the sidelines, not a tactician. I never heard him offer any instruction to his players other than “good job” “you’ve got to fight” or “we want this more than them” type statements all game long. During the game I saw him grab his white board one time – and this is true – and then almost immediately he handed it back to an assistant and didn’t use it. Although admittedly the game was lost for his team by that time.
HOWEVER, all that said, that doesn’t mean he’s not a good coach. What matters is a coach’s ability to get his team over the finish line with a win. And motivator’s can OFTEN do that much better than good X & O guys. In fact, I have some first-hand experience with seeing a great motivator get the better of an infinitely better X & O coach. And I think Pearl is one of, if not the best motivators in CBB. Which is why I agree with you that he would have probably been successful at UK. But I’ll never agree that Pearl is a good bench coach - or even a better bench coach than Calipari (who I also don’t think is a great bench coach, but has other things he was good at as well).