www.espn.com
Betting on his own team to win (which I have zero problem with, why would anyone?) but also stating there is no link to anyone attempting to influence the outcome... right. So by that logic the entirety of the indiana team was ambivalent to the games being played?
Supposedly Pete Rose only bet on his team to win, and he got a lifetime ban from the MLB....
Baseball has it's own set of issues. Turning a blind eye to obvious steroid use as long as ratings are high, Angel Hernandez being an employable person...I really wish he were still around for the challenge system. Bucknor is doing a bang up job of filling his shoes but still.
Betting on your own team to win could be a problem if the amount varies significantly and/or there are games that you don't bet.
If Sorsby plays a single college down, Noah should sue the pants off the NCAA.
And if they do, Iowa and NS should sue them. Otherwise Iowa (and schools like them) will always be the whipping boy. I was disappointed they didn’t appeal the vacated wins, this would be another bend over and grab your ankles moment if Sorsby gets to play for TT.
Ohtani's assistant bet on his behalf and he did the Seargent Schultz defense
You should be right about consistency in rulings, but then I thought about Drew Ott's eligibility case.
I'm cynical enough to believe that Sorsby going to rehab will be enough to mitigate any severe penalties the NCAA will mete out. That and the bazillionares lawyers.
