Pope year 4?

Mar 22, 2026
251
353
63
I will almost always respond when someone directly quotes me. Not responding feels like someone standing there in my face asking me a question and I’m above responding to it. Let it go though. I’m done talking about the back and forth, ok? Done with it. Hope you have a good day.
So that sounds like a complex you have. But you're clearly not done if you're still responding.

Honestly, not sure what you're done with. You never did anything to be done with.
 
Mar 22, 2026
251
353
63
Man, I tried super nice to be patient with you. Blocked. No need to antagonize when I repeatedly and kindly tell you to stop.
You're antagonizing yourself. Literally no one is forcing you to respond but yourself.

Billy Crystal Crying GIF by MOODMAN
 

UKVACats0107

Freshman
Jan 19, 2026
81
93
18
The roster isn't finished yet... but Pope is building the roster how he should have his first or second year, it's almost like he thinks he will get a year 4 no matter what. What do you all think? Does Pope think he's here for a while? Wilkins(who i like) and N-Diaye(who I also like) are gambles and guys who usually blossom after 1 or 2 seasons at the power level but they are projected starters for this year. Still missing multiple stars to really move this team and Pope's tenure. Maybe he is waiting on the 5-for-5 for the bigger names but IMO we need 2 elite players.
I agree 💯!! 2 elite players will be essential for this team. The SF/SG position to me are open and waiting for those potential 2 players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAC71

Eagles_Ball_69

All-American
Dec 19, 2003
4,088
5,541
82
The fan in me will never consider an elite eight worse than not making one.

Keatts is also not a good example for the theoretical problem you’re trying to resolve. Yes, he made a final four but he was gone within a couple years anyway.

I really think the issue is — you’ve decided Pope CANNOT do the job and he CANNOT be the man here. You aren’t open to the idea that he can be. So, an elite eight or final four run wouldn’t be evidence to you that he can — it’s a “fools gold run”, mere luck in that scenario. However, if he flames out in the round of 32 in this scenario, that IS evidence to you that he CANNOT do the job. There’s nothing objectively wrong with being set against the coach, but it does help support why you’d refer to it all as sad. As a fellow fan, I’d hate to feel that way and I’m glad I’m not nearly as settled as you are on Pope. My mind can be changed one way or the other, based on how things play out.
That’s not at all true. I legit used the whole body of work scenario. I think he can’t do the job because he’s got a 6th and 10th place finish in conference. Also because his trajectory is opposite of what it should be. Also because his history says this is who he is. Also because he can’t land a recruit better than Furmans best player (kidding, sort of). And on top of all that he’s just weird AF in the media and now in hiding.

If he had a season where he actually recruited well, won or finished in the top 2 or 3 of the conference and showed some consistency, my mind would be completely changed…if he could actually replicate it. But there’s nothing in his past or present performance that says he can do that.

I think REAL tourney runs are the by product of the process being rock solid. He’s a long way from being rock solid in the process. A long LONG way.
 

Hart03

Redshirt
Dec 1, 2025
10
23
3
My thing is I think Pope a better coach then Calipari by far and soon as he figures out recruiting and his substitutions he will be one of the top coaches out there. He is proven he can beat top teams with inferior players.
 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,856
4,659
113
None of that is elite. 11.9? Elite scorer? Even 14 isn’t elite. I’m kind of amazed at the post to be honest.
So you are then saying you do not need any elite scorers to win the National Championship. The claim I was responding to was that you need multiple elite scorers to compete at a high level. You did get the part that 11.9 was MKG and the leading scorer at 14.2 was Anthony Davis?
 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,856
4,659
113
That’s your opinion. But at Kentucky, a school where 5 coaches have won NCAA titles, you are expected to win early and often. To act like Pope didn’t know the deal, especially after his predecessor had exceeded his own grace period, is just silly. Standards are lowered when mediocrity is accepted. Pope is paid handsomely, partly because this job ages you quickly if you’re not winning.

Now as to your argument about coaches not wanting to step into the role, I would say that’s a very beta mentality. Alpha coaches will always want jobs like Kentucky. Bruce Pearl would have taken this job in a heartbeat, but was not offered by Mitch, another beta male.
Beta mentality? :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:

The premise was if they know they have 2 or 3 years max to get a Final Four or they are getting fired vs. staying were they are already successful or taking another high level job without psychotic demands from entitled delusional fans..
 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,856
4,659
113
That's been because the SEC was a bit overrated the last 2 years.

And we don't retain coaches just because they chose to coach UK who plays tough schedules..

You had to be raised by the biggest losers imaginable to have your mentality.
It has nothing to do with anyone overrating the SEC. The sports reference site is strictly by the numbers. My mentality has zero to do with this. It is straight fact according to this unbiased source.
 
Mar 22, 2026
251
353
63
One outlier example doesn't mean much. He had already taken the Michigan job before Cal's departure was official but I doubt he considers this job if he knows the demand is he does it in the first 2 or seasons or he gets fired.
What was outlier about it? He used NIL and the transfer portal. Did not everyone else have access to the same thing?

You're right highly competitive and successful people hate demanding situations and pressure!

Mothers Day Lol GIF by reactionseditor
 
Mar 22, 2026
251
353
63
It has nothing to do with anyone overrating the SEC. The sports reference site is strictly by the numbers. My mentality has zero to do with this. It is straight fact according to this unbiased source.
But it does have to do with the SEC being overrated. That's already been broken down in this thread. If the SEC was overrated, that's going to artificially increase our SOS. Which it did.

Your mentality has a lot to do with it. It a complete losers mentality like the losers that raised you to have it.
 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,856
4,659
113
You think a 14 loss season isn't all that bad? To me, you can't use a SoS argument when we lost at home to UGA, Mizzou and a UNC team that got Hubert fired. Add in the losses to Louisville, A&M and NIT champs Auburn...not to mention the monster losses (one of which was in historic fashion)...I just don't think the SoS argument stands up very well. We had some impressive wins, even with all of the issues. But still a couple of miracles away from 15-16 losses and an NIT bid.
I didn't say it wasn't all that bad. I said it wasn't as bad as he thinks or what the record alone would normally indicate. The season is measured as a whole with no emotion by their unbiased metric.
 
Last edited:

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,856
4,659
113
You're overlooking the fact that the SEC was vastly overrated all season, which is where we played 8 of those AP ranked teams. We beat 1 ranked team outside of the SEC, snd they were 22nd at the time.

Yes, we best Vandy handily, after they beat us in record fashion in Vandy.

Then the beat downs by UL, MSU, Zags, Iowa St. Bama.
The metric I provided from Sports-Reference gives no consideration to ranking. It strictly based on numbers vs competition played and their numbers vs. who they played.
 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,856
4,659
113
I didn’t overlook anything. 14 ranked teams is 14 ranked teams. You can poke holes in that but it’s still 14 no matter how you slice it.

Now, the 2025 team played a tougher SoS than the 2026 team and that I can prove. But we can’t act like the 2026 team played anything other than a ridiculous schedule.
The unbiased source that I have provided repeatedly has the last two seasons as the toughest in school history.
 
Last edited:

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,856
4,659
113
The SEC is much better than it used to be, so the schedule rating is better. Should UK just make that the excuse for being mediocre from now on?
I never said that but it is a reality to be considered. Our 24-12 '25 season stacks up pretty evenly with our 26-8 '22 season is the point.

 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,856
4,659
113
Can you at least acknowledge that, with the portal and NIL, it’s much easier? That part of CBB has majorly changed. Rebuilds happen in a few weeks now, not years.

Btw…I’m not arguing your point on firing him or not. I think he should’ve never gotten his first year, so if I’m being completely honest every single year he performs in the same “meh” way he has his entire coaching career is an indictment. But I acknowledge my mind was made up before he ever coached his first game. Problem is, he’s never done anything to prove me wrong. And before you say it, he definitely could. He just hasn’t yet.
The point was if it is so much easier to turn things around in one year then it's disingenuous to claim he will set us back years even after he is removed. Whether or not he should have been hired is an entirely different debate but he was hired and now doing the revolving door is just not something I support barring extreme circumstance. If year 3 doesn't go better I will not complain if we decide to move on.
 
Last edited:

Eagles_Ball_69

All-American
Dec 19, 2003
4,088
5,541
82
The point was if it is so much easier to turn things around in one year then it's disingenuous to claim he will set as back years even after he is removed. Whether or not he should have been hired is an entirely different debate but he was hired and now doing the revolving door is just not something I support barring extreme circumstance. If year 3 doesn't go better I will not complain if we decide to move on.
Yeah. That’s fair. It can flip quickly if you’re good. No arguments from me there.
 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,856
4,659
113
But it does have to do with the SEC being overrated. That's already been broken down in this thread. If the SEC was overrated, that's going to artificially increase our SOS. Which it did.

Your mentality has a lot to do with it. It a complete losers mentality like the losers that raised you to have it.
Just because you have an affinity for being rude it does not lend credence to anything you say.
 
Last edited:

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,856
4,659
113
Lol, so we are blaming him for a year there wasn't even a final 4?
I'm not the one pushing the preposterous notion that anything that occurred under Cal should affect the demands made on Pope. I never set out to criticize Cal. The poster I was debating with laid out the time frame including the year with no tourney.
 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,856
4,659
113
What was outlier about it? He used NIL and the transfer portal. Did not everyone else have access to the same thing?

You're right highly competitive and successful people hate demanding situations and pressure!

Mothers Day Lol GIF by reactionseditor
What makes it an outlier is it is one example of a coach who succeeded at this vs. hundreds who haven't.
 
Jul 30, 2024
6,451
12,895
113
I'm not the one pushing the preposterous notion that anything that occurred under Cal should affect the demands made on Pope. I never set out to criticize Cal. The poster I was debating with laid out the time frame including the year with no tourney.
Paul, you best save your time and ignore that fella. He’s extremely abrasive and doesn’t debate in good faith. You can systematically show him the inconsistency of his methodology and he’ll refuse to even acknowledge it.

Referring to @Praetorian Cat btw. Pointless to engage him.
 

JAC71

All-American
Jun 28, 2015
4,943
9,266
113
My thing is I think Pope a better coach then Calipari by far and soon as he figures out recruiting and his substitutions he will be one of the top coaches out there. He is proven he can beat top teams with inferior players.
The man has recruits laughing behind his back and other programs calling him out. I would say he’s an average coach and his resume says that’s pushing it, terrible at motivating players though
 
Mar 22, 2026
251
353
63
I'm not the one pushing the preposterous notion that anything that occurred under Cal should affect the demands made on Pope. I never set out to criticize Cal. The poster I was debating with laid out the time frame including the year with no tourney.
It's not really preposterous. He took over a program he knew had high demands and had not been achieving them for several years. He also knew he was being supplied with a high NIL package and advantages no previous coaches has in terms of buying a roster. If he didn't know he was taking over a pressure cooker situation with limited time to right the ship before it would be time to make a change. It’s not like he was hired based on past performance.
 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,856
4,659
113
It's not really preposterous. He took over a program he knew had high demands and had not been achieving them for several years. He also knew he was being supplied with a high NIL package and advantages no previous coaches has in terms of buying a roster. If he didn't know he was taking over a pressure cooker situation with limited time to right the ship before it would be time to make a change. It’s not like he was hired based on past performance.
Can you comprehend that his competition was also being supplied with NIL packages and advantages they have never had before? I'm not at all convinced that UK had the most to spend. All the arguing is pretty pointless anyway. Pope is here for a 3rd season no matter what we think of it.
 
Mar 22, 2026
251
353
63
Can you comprehend that his competition was also being supplied with NIL packages and advantages they have never had before? I'm not at all convinced that UK had the most to spend.
Most aren’t though. Most athletic programs were already operating at a loss before NIL and certainly can't keep up with the top tier of teams who actually do. We just spent 22 million to have 14 losses. Recruits are actively saying they are turning down higher offers from us to go elsewhere.

You choosing not to believe it doesn't make it untrue. It's coming from way too many places not to be.