More than one 3 point shooter needs to be on the court .Need a Zrno replacement too.
More than one 3 point shooter needs to be on the court .Need a Zrno replacement too.
Do you know something we don't know about his training the last three years, or how good his coaching has been? Sounds like a lot of supposition.
Yah think." I'm assuming it's cheaper to get players in women's ball but still.."
You're a nut.More than one 3 point shooter needs to be on the court .
I guess you have no idea that vegaspj is a Shu troll ,that normally attacks RU on their board. And by the way he contends college sports are worthless due to NIL yet he can't stop posting--- why? Cause he's an a$$ hat.Yup,go support a d bag that's hates RU-- maybe you're the same guy.You’re a good fan all you do on here is insult people for having an opinion you and mugrat and ancient must all be the same guy
Since when is it not allowed to have differing opinions? That’s kinda why this country is royally screwed these days
I’m not I sit in section 305 for 10 years my entire family are RU alumniI guess you have no idea that vegaspj is a Shu troll ,that normally attacks RU on their board. And by the way he contends college sports are worthless due to NIL yet he can't stop posting--- why? Cause he's an a$$ hat.Yup,go support a d bag that's hates RU-- maybe you're the same guy.
I guess you believe differing opinions that attack RU and are just nasty troll BS are acceptable. And you believe a guy who goes out of his way to attack RU has honest, sincere intentions. Good gor you.I’m not I sit in section 305 for 10 years my entire family are RU alumni
don’t pay attention to his posts
good job once again ignoring what I actually said
I asked if it’s ok for People to have differing opinions
More than one 3 point shooter needs to be on the court .
Who are you referring to? I don’t go out of my way to defend Vegas or bacI guess you believe differing opinions that attack RU and are just nasty troll BS are acceptable. And you believe a guy who goes out of his way to attack RU has honest, sincere intentions. Good gor you.
More than one 3 point shooter needs to be on the court .
Lets start with more than one 3 point shooter on the roster.
Actually having two on the court might put Knight and Pike into shock.
Think its been said 3, but I'm not sure what hes done in the off time that would solve his eligibility.So assuming this guy is even eligible (has that been confirmed?) how many years of eligibility would he have?
4?
Since he never played at NM.
I know nobody stays at 1 school but just wondering.
Think its been said 3, but I'm not sure what hes done in the off time that would solve his eligibility.
I'm sure it was, or they are just doing the Dorian Jones thing and planning to pay him something this year while he goes to school and gets himself eligible for 2nd half the year.Were there still SAT/ACT test score minimums back in 2022. When were those waived? Just thinking of possibilities. I’d like to believe any contract we gave him was contingent on him qualifying.
I'm sure it was, or they are just doing the Dorian Jones thing and planning to pay him something this year while he goes to school and gets himself eligible for 2nd half the year.
Of course I think they expect him to be eligible, just wouldn't surprise me if his one year deal was guaranteed whether he is or is not. Just because he was first, doesn't mean he was top priority. Not being at another school probably means we were able to talk to him more than other guys early.No way. You think they wanted this kid so badly they made him our first signee and offered to pay him even if he doesn’t end up being able to play? Can’t see it. Dorian Jones was our last pick up at a point when we weren’t going to add anyone else of note.
Of course I think they expect him to be eligible, just wouldn't surprise me if his one year deal was guaranteed whether he is or is not. Just because he was first, doesn't mean he was top priority. Not being at another school probably means we were able to talk to him more than other guys early.
Just cause it doesn't make sense doesn't mean its not possible. Who knows what there thought/plan is.There would be no reason to allocate a penny to him at this juncture if there’s a chance he may not be available to play. If he was demanding guaranteed payment I’d think it would be a hard pass. We’re on a limited budget. We have Powers (likely) and a frosh 2 guard, plus Francis plays the 2. It would make no sense to spend anything we have right now on someone who doesn’t play a position of clear need and isn’t even a guarantee to be eligible. The timing does matter a lot. With Jones there was nobody left to use the money on.
Just cause it doesn't make sense doesn't mean its not possible. Who knows what there thought/plan is.
The question is: will Durate be eligible or ineligible because he played as a pro ??
> During his last two seasons playing professionally in his homeland, Duarte played 38 games and averaged 8.9 points, three rebounds, and 1.4 assists per game while recording an average of 21.3 minutes per game.<
https://www.onthebanks.com/rutgers-...arte-yet-to-receive-signing-clearance-by-ncaa
I don’t understand what he’s appealing? There’s no way we guaranteed we could get him eligible. No NIL deal was signed so clearly any agreement was contingent on his qualification. Pike made a good faith effort to try to get him eligible and didn’t succeed. Duarte could’ve walked away at any point - yes? There was no signed deal. I don’t get it.Looks like he won't be playing
The NCAA won't clear him (playing for Overtime Elite ??) and Rutgers withdrew his financial aId package they were offering him to attend RU
google search found:
Lewis Duarte is set for an appeals hearing with the University Financial Aid Committee on Athletics Appeals, triggered after Rutgers notified him on July 14, 2026, that his athletic financial aid agreement would be canceled
Financial Aid Appeal Details
- Cancellation Notice Date: July 14, 2026, via Rutgers University Enrollment Services.
- Action Taken: Formal appeal initiated by Lenny Minaya on behalf of Duarte.
- Next Step: An upcoming hearing with the University Financial Aid Committee on Athletics Appeals.
- Root Cause: Inability to secure NCAA eligibility following his transfer commitment.
Only at Rutgers do these incidents get blown upI don’t understand what he’s appealing? There’s no way we guaranteed we could get him eligible. No NIL deal was signed so clearly any agreement was contingent on his qualification. Pike made a good faith effort to try to get him eligible and didn’t succeed. Duarte could’ve walked away at any point - yes? There was no signed deal. I don’t get it.
This is such a joke. Obviously, RU was going to tell Duarte they are trying to get him eligible and would hope he’d stick around until they went out to replace him. Without a NIL agreement (and even still then) kids can “decommit” at any time. We weren’t holding Duarte hostage. He could’ve moved on whenever he wanted.Only at Rutgers do these incidents get blown up
We don't know if it was implied by Rutgers that the school could get him eligible and that is the the reason he's pealing.I don’t understand what he’s appealing? There’s no way we guaranteed we could get him eligible. No NIL deal was signed so clearly any agreement was contingent on his qualification. Pike made a good faith effort to try to get him eligible and didn’t succeed. Duarte could’ve walked away at any point - yes? There was no signed deal. I don’t get it.
We don't know if it was implied by Rutgers that the school could get him eligible and that is the the reason he's pealing.
I'm guessing RU just implied there was a chance and he should hang tight and now his agent is using that for the appeal and a possible lawsuit ( out of court settlement intended ) when appeal is denied by RU .
This just might be a long-shot money grab , from RU , move because I haven't heard about him appealing the NCAA declaring him ineligible or suing them for the right to play College Ball
"Legally, does it even matter what Rutgers told him?"Legally, does it even matter what Rutgers told him? Words are just words. Companies drag along their second tier back up candidates for positions all the time. If one of them were to turn down another opportunity because someone led them to believe they would get a certain job that never comes along there’s no legal ground to contest it. Why is this any different?
Good point. Paying him a lump sum of whatever he could’ve reasonably expected to collect in the Dominican league next season might be easier than going to court."Legally, does it even matter what Rutgers told him?"
The reason to sue might be the case and getting a few bucks from RU in an out of court settlement because Rutgers doesn't want it dragged out paying lawyers more than getting rid of the the pest quickly would cost and having their recruiting practices scrutinized
The Knight Report
Chin, Walker named to Comeback Player of the Year Watch List
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Fall Camp: Get 75% off The Knight Report - Final Day!
The Knight Report
Rutgers announces new traffic, parking changes for football game days
The Knight Report
2026 Rutgers Football Mobile Wallpaper
The Knight Report
2028 Illinois EDGE Kristian Chadick adds Rutgers Football Offer