Is Big East Best for SHU into the future?

PhishingPirate088

Sophomore
Mar 10, 2022
314
157
43
I agree we have to stay in the BE but this is strange logic. We are not able to compete in the A10 so we have to stay in the Big East since we are barely a D1 program. LOL.

It’s like saying someone who play in the NBA at a lower level needs to stay in the NBA because he can’t compete in the G League. Huh?!
You can’t read either

I said out athletics department

ie: every other sport we compete in on the average is extremely low level D1 AND we don’t offer like any sports

We are a DREADFUL athletics department

So the idea we “drop down” and compete in the A10 without BE resources we would fall off a cliff
 

PirateBlue08

Senior
Jul 25, 2025
449
444
63
You can’t read either

I said out athletics department

ie: every other sport we compete in on the average is extremely low level D1 AND we don’t offer like any sports

We are a DREADFUL athletics department

So the idea we “drop down” and compete in the A10 without BE resources we would fall off a cliff
It’s not about reading it’s about your point making no sense. If we can currently compete in the BigEast we can currently compete in any league below the BigEast. Obviously.

But the real point is if we drop down we will no longer be getting BigEast funding and then we will no longer be able to perform on our current level in anything.
 

PhishingPirate088

Sophomore
Mar 10, 2022
314
157
43
It’s not about reading it’s about your point making no sense. If we can currently compete in the BigEast we can currently compete in any league below the BigEast. Obviously.

But the real point is if we drop down we will no longer be getting BigEast funding and then we will no longer be able to perform on our current level in anything.
I am NOT talking about basketball..try again
 

PhishingPirate088

Sophomore
Mar 10, 2022
314
157
43
Neither am I. What is hard about this
lol ok

The point is we have an average basketball team in a mid major conference that has above average revenue generation

Because of that we do anything we can do to stay afloat in other sports with that $$ amount..and we do a pretty TERRIBLE job at that within a pretty subpar conference overall (without basketball included)

If we wanted to “drop levels” that revenue is bye-bye and our already barely competitive athletics department would get worse

Therefore we would never fit in the A-10 with A-10 revenues because we can’t even really compete now with big east revenue

So if we drop a level it would be MAAC or nec or American east or imo maybe not even D1
 
Feb 6, 2019
250
568
93
What I can’t figure out is why people who think we should step down to the A10 or MAAC think you would transition apples to apples.
  • Our BE revenue share would be gone.
    We would make even less on ticket sales / season tickets because the demand would go down when the teams in the building aren’t at the level of Nova, SJU, UCONN.
  • Or the revenue will go down because you’re playing at Walsh, which means you couldn’t appease all the fans we do have left.
  • You can’t pay the coach what we currently pay him annually to be in a lesser league.
  • With all the revenue being reduced, the quality of players you could attract drops down to that level.
  • You absolutely become a feeder school on an annual basis.​
  • Now you’re in a conference fighting for 1-2 spots in the tournament if you’re lucky.​
 

PirateBlue08

Senior
Jul 25, 2025
449
444
63
lol ok

The point is we have an average basketball team in a mid major conference that has above average revenue generation

Because of that we do anything we can do to stay afloat in other sports with that $$ amount..and we do a pretty TERRIBLE job at that within a pretty subpar conference overall (without basketball included)

If we wanted to “drop levels” that revenue is bye-bye and our already barely competitive athletics department would get worse

Therefore we would never fit in the A-10 with A-10 revenues because we can’t even really compete now with big east revenue

So if we drop a level it would be MAAC or nec or American east or imo maybe not even D1
So we agree then. Sounded like you were saying our current teams are barely D1 which is bullish*t
 

HALL85

Heisman
Jul 5, 2001
29,868
11,055
113
We have to stay in the Big East until whatever happens to the league happens. The question is do you make the investment to compete at the top of the league or if you don’t, be prepared for more challenging time to breakthrough and make the dance. As Lloyd says, we are not alone but you don’t drop down.
 

SHUSource

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2001
41,868
4,000
48
What I can’t figure out is why people who think we should step down to the A10 or MAAC think you would transition apples to apples.
  • Our BE revenue share would be gone.
    We would make even less on ticket sales / season tickets because the demand would go down when the teams in the building aren’t at the level of Nova, SJU, UCONN.
  • Or the revenue will go down because you’re playing at Walsh, which means you couldn’t appease all the fans we do have left.
  • You can’t pay the coach what we currently pay him annually to be in a lesser league.
  • With all the revenue being reduced, the quality of players you could attract drops down to that level.
  • You absolutely become a feeder school on an annual basis.​
  • Now you’re in a conference fighting for 1-2 spots in the tournament if you’re lucky.​
One bid, really, because with Walsh as our only venue, we would not be welcome in the Atlantic-10. So you’re taking the MAAC, and even then, Walsh barely cuts it. But that would be our place. It’s preposterous to think this would make things better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silkcity Pirate

MooneyHall07

Sophomore
Feb 18, 2023
155
159
43
What I can’t figure out is why people who think we should step down to the A10 or MAAC think you would transition apples to apples.
  • Our BE revenue share would be gone.
    We would make even less on ticket sales / season tickets because the demand would go down when the teams in the building aren’t at the level of Nova, SJU, UCONN.
  • Or the revenue will go down because you’re playing at Walsh, which means you couldn’t appease all the fans we do have left.
  • You can’t pay the coach what we currently pay him annually to be in a lesser league.
  • With all the revenue being reduced, the quality of players you could attract drops down to that level.
  • You absolutely become a feeder school on an annual basis.​
  • Now you’re in a conference fighting for 1-2 spots in the tournament if you’re lucky.​

I would add that the value of season tickets goes down since your NCAA hopes basically comes down to one weekend in Atlantic City or somewhere else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Left Coast Pirates

BrklynGrad

Freshman
Feb 1, 2026
129
78
28
To what extent has the growth and developement of the university been a result of our BE affiliation and the natural publicity it affords? I think of the Hall five to ten years before the conference: 800 students per class; two dorms--- the old one and the new one; two or three games per year at MSG as parts of double-headers that drew about 4,000; nine of ten kids from Jersey. Could the university sustain itself as it is presently constructed without it Big East membership?
 

Blue Bloods

Sophomore
Mar 13, 2004
5,336
122
63
One bid, really, because with Walsh as our only venue, we would not be welcome in the Atlantic-10. So you’re taking the MAAC, and even then, Walsh barely cuts it. But that would be our place. It’s preposterous to think this would make things better.

Walsh Gymnasium is an embarrassment. Even the original Yankee Stadium was torn down.
 

NIL BAD

Junior
Aug 15, 2025
316
275
63
What I can’t figure out is why people who think we should step down to the A10 or MAAC think you would transition apples to apples.
  • Our BE revenue share would be gone.
    We would make even less on ticket sales / season tickets because the demand would go down when the teams in the building aren’t at the level of Nova, SJU, UCONN.
  • Or the revenue will go down because you’re playing at Walsh, which means you couldn’t appease all the fans we do have left.
  • You can’t pay the coach what we currently pay him annually to be in a lesser league.
  • With all the revenue being reduced, the quality of players you could attract drops down to that level.
  • You absolutely become a feeder school on an annual basis.​
  • Now you’re in a conference fighting for 1-2 spots in the tournament if you’re lucky.​

All great points but Im still struggling on how you justify investing over $10M per year to a below average program with little student support that receives $4.7M from the conference for all sports.
 

radecicco

All-Conference
Jun 24, 2013
789
1,215
93
This conversation is so lame. We’re not going anywhere. Things will change in 2030/31 when all the media deals except the ACC come up for renewal including the BE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hallwins

NIL BAD

Junior
Aug 15, 2025
316
275
63
What’s lame is thinking we can piss away millions for 5 more years. SH isn’t a state or federal institution where there is virtually no accountability how money is spent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HALL85

cernjSHU

Junior
Jul 17, 2001
124
347
63
This board is not seeing the bigger picture and focusing on Seton Hall. The Big East is in trouble. Every school but for UConn and Villanova is in trouble. Once UConn leaves. and they will leave, this league is done. Villanova will leave with them. The Big East is a thorn in the side of the power 4 conferences. This will destroy the league and it will relegate it to A-10 status.
 

IronKaz1

Junior
Mar 21, 2004
553
313
63
why Villanova has no football to bring to the the table.. So your saying Saint Johns and Georgetown will also turn to sh-t as well?
 

PirateBlue08

Senior
Jul 25, 2025
449
444
63
This board is not seeing the bigger picture and focusing on Seton Hall. The Big East is in trouble. Every school but for UConn and Villanova is in trouble. Once UConn leaves. and they will leave, this league is done. Villanova will leave with them. The Big East is a thorn in the side of the power 4 conferences. This will destroy the league and it will relegate it to A-10 status.
I agree with everything until Villanova leaving with UConn :LOL: To go where??
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anon1774390042

PirateBlue08

Senior
Jul 25, 2025
449
444
63
The Big East is a thorn in the side of the power 4 conferences. This will destroy the league and it will relegate it to A-10 status.
Can anyone articulate why we are such a thorn? They really lay up awake at night thinking about us? Somehow little ol Catholic schools with tiny endowments are somehow holding them back? I want to understand this
 

dehere23

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2015
1,120
1,132
113
This board is not seeing the bigger picture and focusing on Seton Hall. The Big East is in trouble. Every school but for UConn and Villanova is in trouble. Once UConn leaves. and they will leave, this league is done. Villanova will leave with them. The Big East is a thorn in the side of the power 4 conferences. This will destroy the league and it will relegate it to A-10 status.
St John’s has been one of the biggest stories nationally over the past 2 years. They draw more for Butler on a Tuesday night in the dead of winter than our biggest games during the Willard era, and they are covered like a quasi professional team by the NY media. Now that may all go away when Pitino is done, but UConn, Nova and them is a pretty good foundation right now.
 

HALL85

Heisman
Jul 5, 2001
29,868
11,055
113
This board is not seeing the bigger picture and focusing on Seton Hall. The Big East is in trouble. Every school but for UConn and Villanova is in trouble. Once UConn leaves. and they will leave, this league is done. Villanova will leave with them. The Big East is a thorn in the side of the power 4 conferences. This will destroy the league and it will relegate it to A-10 status.
There is another conference reshuffle on the horizon with the B10 and SEC driving the bus….football driven. UConn could be attractive to the ACC to fill defections.

The BE will be a mid-major that will get 1-3 bids and will be challenged to make the Sweet 16. SJU was essentially irrelevant for decades before Pitino got there. Need to position the league as a premier mid-major MBB conference and try to maximize whatever media money is out there because of the populations in the markets.

A realistic if not pretty future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shupat08