BB Recruiting 2026 Rutgers Basketball Transfer Portal Tracker

RAC93

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2023
3,027
4,948
113
Is somebody gonna pay him $1 million to play for them ? Have they watched any of his games ?
This team desperately needed production and leadership from him. Instead they got..........
Tony Soprano Nothing GIF
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,237
12,559
78
You must mean as a bench player.

Against weaker competition he was a lot better (even in the UNLV game). I think he’ll start wherever he goes in a weaker league and put up nice numbers then we’ll have a collection of threads talking about how Pike failed to develop him (like Wolf). He turned out to be a recruiting miss at the BIG level. Full stop. Doesn’t matter what he does in a weaker league next year.
 

LotusAggressor_rivals

All-American
Oct 11, 2003
16,090
7,864
113
He was very limited. For all the talk about how European players are fundamentally sound, he did not live up to that stereotype. He couldn't dribble and might have been the worst passer on the team. Need to get players who are not limited. Players that can, shoot, pass,and dribble
All the other European players in the tournament were skilled, versatile, and fundamentally sound. The ones RU recruited were not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: runova09

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,421
7,682
113
Well now it is official. We need an entire frontline. 2 power forwards , 2 centers and an impact wing or big guard that can play the 2-3 positions. Pike needs 5 impact portal players to team with Francis , Lino , Kaden , Davis and Wooten as well as Buchanan. Good mix of returnees and new portal guys. Pike is on the clock. $10 million is nothing to snooze at . Time is now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wagram97

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,237
12,559
78
Well now it is official. We need an entire frontline. 2 power forwards , 2 centers and an impact wing or big guard that can play the 2-3 positions. Pike needs 5 impact portal players to team with Francis , Lino , Kaden , Davis and Wooten as well as Buchanan. Good mix of returnees and new portal guys. Pike is on the clock. $10 million is nothing to snooze at . Time is now.

I don’t think purchasing true seasoned “back ups” in the portal is in the cards. The starting center and forward are going to cost us half our budget, realistically. We’re going to need to aim for versatility. Probably a PF who can play minutes at center along with sliding Buchanan over for short stretches when we can get away with it.

I think beyond this we’re looking at adding only one more seasoned player and then filling out the roster with cheaper developmental guys (hopefully well scouted). Of course, if J Mike or Lino move on, that changes things and then maybe we’re adding 2 more players with solid experience. Just don’t see our budget allowing for more than this. We seem to be looking at pure PGs which tells me one of them may be leaving. If we keep both and Tariq, I’d rather se us targeting lengthy wings with handling skills that mid-major PGs like the Merrimack kid.
 

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,421
7,682
113
I don’t think purchasing true seasoned “back ups” in the portal is in the cards. The starting center and forward are going to cost us half our budget, realistically. We’re going to need to aim for versatility. Probably a PF who can play minutes at center along with sliding Buchanan over for short stretches when we can get away with it.

I think beyond this we’re looking at adding only one more seasoned player and then filling out the roster with cheaper developmental guys (hopefully well scouted). Of course, if J Mike or Lino move on, that changes things and then maybe we’re adding 2 more players with solid experience. Just don’t see our budget allowing for more than this. We seem to be looking at pure PGs which tells me one of them may be leaving. If we keep both and Tariq, I’d rather se us targeting lengthy wings with handling skills that mid-major PGs like the Merrimack kid.
We need grown men on the frontline line. The winning model is playing 2 of them together. They need capable backups that don’t cause such a drop off. If you watched any of the lower conference tournaments there were a ton of kids on the frontline that were functional , could shoot at the basket , dribble and drive on a short roll. We need at least 3 but preferably 4. I do not really care if they are all equally talented and do not need one stud that will break the bank. $4-5 million for those 3-4 players that are not presently on high major teams is doable. Leaves plenty of $ for an impact wing or guard and the returnees. No compromise on not getting a frontline. Pike doesn’t get it then it is a failure before the season even starts.
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,426
16,264
113
This is something I think most here expected and bot considered a big loss because of how his play was at the end of season.
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,203
12,463
113
He was very limited. For all the talk about how European players are fundamentally sound, he did not live up to that stereotype. He couldn't dribble and might have been the worst passer on the team. Need to get players who are not limited. Players that can, shoot, pass,and dribble
Players with those skill sets aren't coming to Rutgers because they have better options.
 

Bob Chaewsky_rivals

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2008
7,486
4,851
113
I really don't think Pike has developed many players in 10 years, but shouldn't Grant's regression cancel out say someones improvement - Grant/Mag for example?
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,237
12,559
78
I really don't think Pike has developed many players in 10 years, but shouldn't Grant's regression cancel out say someones improvement - Grant/Mag for example?

I don’t think he “regressed”. I think he’s an opportunist type player who moves pretty well without the ball which is a big deal when your playing alongside another forward like Ace while defenses also have to account for Dylan Harper. Thats his “skill”. He never possessed any “moves”, couldn’t handle the ball, isn’t a good shooter or a good defender. He never was any of those things though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wagram97 and Kbe4

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,356
4,650
66
Against weaker competition he was a lot better (even in the UNLV game). I think he’ll start wherever he goes in a weaker league and put up nice numbers then we’ll have a collection of threads talking about how Pike failed to develop him (like Wolf). He turned out to be a recruiting miss at the BIG level. Full stop. Doesn’t matter what he does in a weaker league next year.
The element of the statement Shelby disagrees with was ‘strong A10’. Strong A10 is on par with RU and Grant couldn’t cut it here, so he’d be inadequate there too.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,237
12,559
78
The element of the statement Shelby disagrees with was ‘strong A10’. Strong A10 is on par with RU and Grant couldn’t cut it here, so he’d be inadequate there too.
Ok I guess. Maybe he couldn’t play for St Louis. I don’t actually think St Joes was “strong”. Who did they beat? Thats the 3rd place team.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,237
12,559
78
We need grown men on the frontline line. The winning model is playing 2 of them together. They need capable backups that don’t cause such a drop off. If you watched any of the lower conference tournaments there were a ton of kids on the frontline that were functional , could shoot at the basket , dribble and drive on a short roll. We need at least 3 but preferably 4. I do not really care if they are all equally talented and do not need one stud that will break the bank. $4-5 million for those 3-4 players that are not presently on high major teams is doable. Leaves plenty of $ for an impact wing or guard and the returnees. No compromise on not getting a frontline.

Yeah sure. All of that sounds great. Unfortunately, I think you are drastically underestimating what FMV is for competent centers and power forwards. Seton Hall’s Hines is far from a proven super star. He played 18 mpg and put up 6.5 ppg / 5.5 rpg in a weak BE. His asking price has been reported all over social media at 3M.

For perspective, if EO is eligible, there’s a non-zero chance he’s able to collect close to a 7 figure check from a bottom half A-10 or MWC type team. Hes not close to BIG level starter, but he grabbed more rpg this past season than a kid whose asking price is 3M.

Realistically, a 10M budget is going to mean any back up bigs that get added to the roster will have a past like Fall in the portal, or will be Euro roll the dice types like Denis, or late frosh pick ups. We will not be able to afford better seasoned back ups. My preference would’ve actually been to add 3 front court players (one a point forward type with handling skills) and not target guards at all but that doesn’t seem to be the plan. But 10M only goes so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDiddy777

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,237
12,559
78
They saw that he was tall and thought that was enough.
We didn’t land anyone else, and oddly, at the end of the cycle we were probably left with money to “burn” in our pockets once we saw that we couldn’t afford (or land) the guys we actually wanted. That’s my guess anyway how we wound up adding Fall and Denis at the end.
 

RAC93

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2023
3,027
4,948
113
They saw that he was tall and thought that was enough.
So did Kansas State, So did Arkansas, and so did the high school recruiting rankings as they had him as a top 30, 4 star recruit. Add us to the list of getting him wrong. I doubt another power program rolls the dice and says “why not, we can change him”, but who knows. He is tall like you said, beyond that, there is not much else to say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mholinko

Mholinko

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2023
1,481
2,275
77
Keep in mind all 3 teams that took him in were 3 of the 5 finalists of his coming out of high school

goes to show sometimes the rankings get it wrong
 

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,669
38,140
113
Agreed but this all falls on Pike and staff. Constantly recruiting kids who are not power 4 players and does nothing to develop them.

Pike great guy but NOT a Power 4 level coach and drastically overpaid!

one more season

The team outperformed the talent on the roster in most of his seasons - yes, 24-25 was a debacle - but the discounted, young squad we put out there this year finished with a final record that was above what the talent on the roster would have dictated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: needmorecowbell

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,669
38,140
113
Yeah sure. All of that sounds great. Unfortunately, I think you are drastically underestimating what FMV is for competent centers and power forwards. Seton Hall’s Hines is far from a proven super star. He played 18 mpg and put up 6.5 ppg / 5.5 rpg in a weak BE. His asking price has been reported all over social media at 3M.

For perspective, if EO is eligible, there’s a non-zero chance he’s able to collect close to a 7 figure check from a bottom half A-10 or MWC type team. Hes not close to BIG level starter, but he grabbed more rpg this past season than a kid whose asking price is 3M.

Realistically, a 10M budget is going to mean any back up bigs that get added to the roster will have a past like Fall in the portal, or will be Euro roll the dice types like Denis, or late frosh pick ups. We will not be able to afford better seasoned back ups. My preference would’ve actually been to add 3 front court players (one a point forward type with handling skills) and not target guards at all but that doesn’t seem to be the plan. But 10M only goes so far.

There are so many guards in the portal, this can’t possibly be a priority. Maybe an opportunistic pickup here or there, but without a solid 4 and 5, we’re toast.