College sports TV ratings are at all time highs. It is not destroying college sports.Can't blame them, though it still won't survive a legal challenge, the current landscape is absolutely disastrous and will ultimately destroy collegiate sports, IMO. The power networks, HBO, Prime, Apple others, have been pushing the NBA games non-stop, yet viewership is still down, this will slowly come to college if the mercenary aspects continue unabated.
I believe it will if things don't change in the coming few years, though the top teams have thrived so far in this new atmosphere, we've failed to adjust, Duke, UCONN, UF and others are carrying on like usual.College sports TV ratings are at all time highs. It is not destroying college sports.
In one post you're doom and gloom about the future while in this one admitting several programs are currently thriving. So...which is it because how can "the current landscape is absolutely disastrous and will ultimately destroy collegiate sports" yet many programs are still finding success be a thing? lol.I believe it will if things don't change in the coming few years, though the top teams have thrived so far in this new atmosphere, we've failed to adjust, Duke, UCONN, UF and others are carrying on like usual.
Still don’t believe it’s good for the game, though no denying many programs are doing much better in this new environment than Kentucky ATM.In one post you're doom and gloom about the future while in this one admitting several programs are currently thriving. So...which is it because how can "the current landscape is absolutely disastrous and will ultimately destroy collegiate sports" yet many programs are still finding success be a thing? lol.
BBN is an older, traditional fanbase who enjoys speaking in absolutes. The current product cannot be in shambles (a buzz word from the old paddock board) while several programs have found the keys to success.
Simply put, we're upset because we're not a Duke, a FL, a Michigan, a Houston, a UConn, or an AZ in this new era.
A lot of the problem with the NBA is the game itself. There were an average of 75 three pointers attempted per game last season. Given the skill these guys have it is probably wise strategically. But it doesn’t make for entertaining basketball to watch IMO.Can't blame them, though it still won't survive a legal challenge, the current landscape is absolutely disastrous and will ultimately destroy collegiate sports, IMO. The power networks, HBO, Prime, Apple others, have been pushing the NBA games non-stop, yet viewership is still down, this will slowly come to college if the mercenary aspects continue unabated.
The other aspect is that college sports have gotten a big boost from conference realignment and legalized gaming. That boost won’t last forever. It’s almost hard to remember now but right before Covid all the talk was about declining attendance in college football.I believe it will if things don't change in the coming few years, though the top teams have thrived so far in this new atmosphere, we've failed to adjust, Duke, UCONN, UF and others are carrying on like usual.
Yep used to love the NBA and now it's nothing but a 3pt shooting contest. We get to see very little of the other skills these guys haveA lot of the problem with the NBA is the game itself. There were an average of 75 three pointers attempted per game last season. Given the skill these guys have it is probably wise strategically. But it doesn’t make for entertaining basketball to watch IMO.
They love what fits their agenda. Repubs were built on capitalism, this is anything but.And all of a sudden the right loves the NCAA.
The question isn't whether the EO makes good or bad changes to college athletics. It was developed alongside a lot of people closely associated with the game who have good feel for the issues it is facing now, and while reasonable people could disagree it is at least a coherent, comprehensive vision of the college sports landscape, which we obviously lack now.