I am speechless.....one of the hardest things I have ever watched 
youtube.com/@etar
youtube.com/@etar
Last edited:
Now, if EVER there was a bannable offense, your post was it. I take back ALL the praise I have given you over the years for exemplary trolling. This erases everything you have accomplished and puts you in a hole so deep you will never get out!!!Original idea for April Fools
I will stick to stalking....you stick to being obtuse. Jokes are not your lane.Now, if EVER there was a bannable offense, your post was it. I take back ALL the praise I have given you over the years for exemplary trolling. This erases everything you have accomplished and puts you in a hole so deep you will never get out!!!
Now, if EVER there was a bannable offense, your post was it. I take back ALL the praise I have given you over the years for exemplary trolling. This erases everything you have accomplished and puts you in a hole so deep you will never get out!!!
I will stick to stalking....you stick to being obtuse. Jokes are not your lane.
You OBVIOUSLY were not any part of the intended audience. And coming from me, being SO VERY VOCAL in the Brands bros. defense, it was rather believable to many. Should I instead make one directed right to PSU fans on an Iowa site? Something along the lines of you guys are so much help on here that I am so happy you are here? Very believable, right?It is a pretty weak April fools joke. I didnt need to press the link which I'm assuming is a rick roll. It would have worked better if Tanner was the OP.
Very weak sauce. Not at all original... but expected.I am speechless.....one of the hardest things I have ever watched
youtube.com/@etar
You and Hugo can fight over this top notch position:Very weak sauce. Not at all original... but expected.
I am speechless.....one of the hardest things I have ever watched
youtube.com/@etar
If you're going to try in April fools joke, you better as they say stick the landing. He didn't even get off the ground.I will stick to stalking....you stick to being obtuse. Jokes are not your lane.
When you have to try so very hard to explain it ad nauseum, it didn't work. I thought you understood that. Guess not.You and Hugo can fight over this top notch position:
You seem to be heavily invested in my postings. What stalker # would you like? #1 is locked in, but you can make your case for the runner up slot!
Also, I am not sure you truly understand what April Fools is truly about. It isn't catching someone with an ornate plan so elaborate that you WOULD NOT expect anyone to see through it. It is catching people with something they SHOULD see through. How are you a fool for believing in something that doesn't put up a single red flag? The entire point is for there to BE red flags and still catch people ANYWAY...
I resemble those comments.Interesting that the PSU trolls are so enamored. Although not fully expected, it is definitely a welcome side effect!
Oh, make no mistake. I only had to explain to those with little to no sense of humor. I didn't expect you to understand that...When you have to try so very hard to explain it ad nauseum, it didn't work. I thought you understood that. Guess not.
OP wasn’t smart enough to create a working Link to said Rick Roll.It is a pretty weak April fools joke. I didnt need to press the link which I'm assuming is a rick roll. It would have worked better if Tanner was the OP.
You only had to explain it to "literally"Oh, make no mistake. I only had to explain to those with little to no sense of humor. I didn't expect you to understand that...
I did? I replied to Hugo in a different thread altogether and then copied it and pasted it to reply to you. That is 2 people, that, of course, have little to no sense of humor. Should I start questioning your use of the word "literally" now?You only had to explain it to "literally"everyone on this board... and in multiple paragraphs to boot. Good job!! Normally it'll take you six paragraphs to try to explain something.
Keep on explaining it all to us. And explaining... and explaining. The lady doth protest too much, methinks. (as usual).I did? I replied to Hugo in a different thread altogether and then copied it and pasted it to reply to you. That is 2 people, that, of course, have little to no sense of humor. Should I start questioning your use of the word "literally" now?
Oh, and the "explanation" was actually ONLY "literally" one paragraph. But, hey thanks for caring so deeply. It helps keep me motivated to post so you have something to look forward to!
Keep on explaining it all to us. And explaining... and explaining. The lady doth protest too much, methinks. (as usual).