You suggested Paris was offered more NIL $'s but chose not to spend it. Your buddy Matt Anderson gave you this bum information. Yes, you and Matt Anderson were wrong.
Final decision made on Paris
- Thread starter StickyBandit
- Start date
Have we verified that he didn't spend all the NIL? Or are we arguing hearsay vs hearsay?
The hearsay i have is from one of Paris's asst coaches. He could be dishonest or protecting his head coach but...
Our AD basically said we needed to give Paris more $$'s. Hard to believe Paris wouldn't have been let go if he decided not to spend $$'s he had on the table. As everyone knows, l like and support Paris. If he left money on the table, I would be at the front of the line asking for his job. If he's given the money necessary to compete, and he continues to struggle, I am good with making a move.
Actually, that information didn’t come from Matt Anderson. It’s sad you have to retort to personal attacks but aube that’s just who you are as a person. I still love you though and I’m sorry that you feel compelled to behave this way.
Sorry I hurt your feelings. Love you also.
Here is what I wrote (below). Not sure this is a personal attack. You suggesting i was making stuff up to fit my narrative feels more like a personal attack than the below.
"You suggested Paris was offered more NIL $'s but chose not to spend it. Your buddy Matt Anderson gave you this bum information. Yes, you and Matt Anderson were wrong."
You haven’t hurt my feelings. It’s just sad that you feel you have to conduct yourself in that manner. Nothing I said was wrong. Chris Clark said if Paris needed more money he could have gotten that, yet Paris felt he’d spent an appropriate amount to construct a team that he felt could compete. That’s leaving money on the table because anyone paying attention nknew this team was horrible particularly with the post players recruited.