Why Tim Lester is in the Press Box & not the sideline

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
2,191
2,482
113
Maybe the development of a passing game will continue to upgrade our ability to recruit better skill players, or is that above your thought process?
Maybe it will.

And maybe that also won't result in more wins.

But as long as a certain amount of passing yardage is gained, fans will be happy
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2D

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
2,191
2,482
113
Maybe the development of a passing game will continue to upgrade our ability to recruit better skill players, or is that above your thought process?
All I know is everything I predicted, at the time of the OC change, has come true.

1. The offense would "improve".

2. Less games would be won.

3. And the level of fan complaint would be less
 

2D

All-American
Oct 8, 2013
2,631
5,450
113
If anyone is interested in the factual statistics of our offense the past three years, you can find the complete numbers here:


Thanks to Lester, our offense has seen improvements in every aspect of the game. This comes at the right time as we are no longer in the lowly B1G West, but instead playing a much tougher schedule year over year. Our SOS over the past three seasons is also covered in that thread as well.

I always enjoy listening to Lester's perspective, and I'm excited to see what he's going to cook up this year, as we saw some flashes of trickeration throughout last season.

Thanks for making Iowa a better team, Tim!
 

herkyou2

Redshirt
Jul 2, 2025
49
34
18
I like Lester, ive got to talk with him a few times. He's very knowledgeable and a nice guy. A big change in the offense was getting comp percentage up. While the passing yards and passing TDs were somewhat comparable to the past handful of years (Petras had 2500 yards in 21). The comp percentage was in the 60% + as a team which hasn't happened since 2015.
Part of that higher percentage is how Lester uses the run game/motion/RPO to help the passing game. Iowa has ran the ball at a higher percentage of plays the last 2 years (2024 64.8%, 2025 63.7%) then any season since the 2002.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franisdaman

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
2,191
2,482
113
If anyone is interested in the factual statistics of our offense the past three years, you can find the complete numbers here:


Thanks to Lester, our offense has seen improvements in every aspect of the game. This comes at the right time as we are no longer in the lowly B1G West, but instead playing a much tougher schedule year over year. Our SOS over the past three seasons is also covered in that thread as well.

I always enjoy listening to Lester's perspective, and I'm excited to see what he's going to cook up this year, as we saw some flashes of trickeration throughout last season.

Thanks for making Iowa a better team, Tim!
This is the exact thing I'm talking about. Can always count on 2D to come through.

AGAIN, there has NOT been improvement in "every aspect of the offense". It is a "factual statistic" that under Lester, the Iowa offense has gotten worse at its most important stat, wins.

I feel sorry for anyone who gives a darn about strength of schedule. Winning is ALWAYS hard.

Even for those who value SOS, it still isn't nearly important enough to justify the the lack of respect the team got for its winning, pre-Lester. It's not nearly important enough to justify the level of negativity around the program, pre-Lester.

And it isn't nearly important enough to justify the statement that, "Lester has made Iowa a better team". At least match the level winning that happened, pre-Lester, and a discussion can then be had about whether Iowa is a better program, and what that can be attributed to. I promise you every '25 team member would have traded their season for the '23 season of 10-4 with a division title. Players and coaches don't give a **** about SOS
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2D

Jayb01

Senior
Jul 3, 2025
211
419
63
This is the exact thing I'm talking about. Can always count on 2D to come through.

AGAIN, there has NOT been improvement in "every aspect of the offense". It is a "factual statistic" that under Lester, the Iowa offense has gotten worse at its most important stat, wins.

I feel sorry for anyone who gives a darn about strength of schedule. Winning is ALWAYS hard.

Even for those who value SOS, it still isn't nearly important enough to justify the the lack of respect the team got for its winning, pre-Lester. It's not nearly important enough to justify the level of negativity around the program, pre-Lester.

And it isn't nearly important enough to justify the statement that, "Lester has made Iowa a better team". At least match the level winning that happened, pre-Lester, and a discussion can then be had about whether Iowa is a better program, and what that can be attributed to. I promise you every '25 team member would have traded their season for the '23 season of 10-4 with a division title. Players and coaches don't give a **** about SOS
God you're dumb. You know Iowa would have still won the West Division if it existed last year? I'm sure every team member would gladly trade last year to get shutout repeatedly in '23, idiot. 31-0, 26-0, 35-0. I'm sure they all thought after narrowly losing to two playoff teams including the eventual national champion that they could just go back to the glory days of getting beat like a rented mule.
 

rchawk

All-American
Oct 27, 2001
74,091
8,464
113
Iowa was very fortunate to have some of the best defenses of the Ferentz era while having some of the worst offenses of the Ferentz era.

Thankfully the East/West divisions are gone, but if they weren't the Hawks would have been in a couple more Big Ten championship games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobchawk

WeBeHerkin

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2016
4,265
4,935
113
The only thing I like better about being on field was there were many times I watched KOK talking with QB and WRs on the sideline together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkdave007

uihawk82

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2021
2,428
3,676
113
The offense has not improved in the "wins" statistic.

In fact, it's gotten worse
It is hard to win these big ten games especially because the other teams are trying hard to win.

Iowa historically has a team winning percentage of 55%, we only win 55 out of every 100. Things have been better since Hayden and Kirk. Iirc, pre-Hayden Iowa was winning at about a 45% rate if that
 
  • Like
Reactions: eyesofhawk

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
2,191
2,482
113
I like Lester, ive got to talk with him a few times. He's very knowledgeable and a nice guy. A big change in the offense was getting comp percentage up. While the passing yards and passing TDs were somewhat comparable to the past handful of years (Petras had 2500 yards in 21). The comp percentage was in the 60% + as a team which hasn't happened since 2015.
Part of that higher percentage is how Lester uses the run game/motion/RPO to help the passing game. Iowa has ran the ball at a higher percentage of plays the last 2 years (2024 64.8%, 2025 63.7%) then any season since the 2002.
Good post.

And another example of how clueless fans can be.

Very few fans would believe that Iowa has actually been much more run heavy under Lester.

They peddled a "run, run, pass" narrative for decades that simply wasn't accurate.

Unfortunately (imo), the pass frequency will increase quite a bit this season. My fear is that Iowa falls too far from who they need to be. I'd love to be proven wrong, whether it's a greater commitment to the run than I'm expecting, or whether it's an ability to win more games than I expect without a certain commitment to the run.

Even with more rush frequency under Lester, it's been shown that a rushing identity isn't what's in his heart. At several keys moments, he has chosen cute shot plays, rather than capitalizing on opportunities to pound on the defense.

Iowa's defense was spectacular in short yardage situations last season. The offense is going to have to at least stay good in those situations. And it will be without the benefit of a power running QB. To me, that means Iowa better be committed to pounding on the D. Again, I have my doubts and am glad to be proven wrong.

Good news is, I expect a really good defense. And if the special teams are also really good, Iowa will win about the same amount of games regardless of what the offense looks Iike
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2D

Cidhawkeye

All-Conference
Jan 1, 2023
1,231
1,848
113
It’s an interesting concept that only offense can deliver wins. I also enjoyed the ‘would trade their season for winning the west’ when the west didn’t exist. Solid trolling.
 

jhoosh43

Junior
Jun 24, 2024
147
383
63
Good post.

And another example of how clueless fans can be.

Very few fans would believe that Iowa has actually been much more run heavy under Lester.
Very few fans would believe that? For someone who is always harping on "false narratives", you keep pushing one about fans.

We all saw the QB struggles and dominance of Kaleb Johnson. And we all watched Gronowski struggle to pass for most of last season while setting a record for rushing td's.

Your posts are repetitive and you sound arrogant AF.
 

yrunvs

Junior
Feb 18, 2012
175
322
63
While I agree the most important stat is W/L there is a stat that really can't be measured and that is the enjoyment/entertainment level. Backyard football is much more entertaining than 3 yards a cloud of dust. So.... one 9-4 record can be can much more entertaining from another 9-4 record and I think that's what Lester brings to the table.
 

Titanhawk

Senior
Jul 14, 2011
566
589
93
This is the exact thing I'm talking about. Can always count on 2D to come through.

AGAIN, there has NOT been improvement in "every aspect of the offense". It is a "factual statistic" that under Lester, the Iowa offense has gotten worse at its most important stat, wins.

I feel sorry for anyone who gives a darn about strength of schedule. Winning is ALWAYS hard.

Even for those who value SOS, it still isn't nearly important enough to justify the the lack of respect the team got for its winning, pre-Lester. It's not nearly important enough to justify the level of negativity around the program, pre-Lester.

And it isn't nearly important enough to justify the statement that, "Lester has made Iowa a better team". At least match the level winning that happened, pre-Lester, and a discussion can then be had about whether Iowa is a better program, and what that can be attributed to. I promise you every '25 team member would have traded their season for the '23 season of 10-4 with a division title. Players and coaches don't give a **** about SOS
So the defense not being great and the some uncharacteristic special teams blunders doesn't compute in the wins/losses? Nice slanted assessment Sparky
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: eyesofhawk and 2D

ThunderDome335

All-Conference
Dec 30, 2025
310
1,398
93
eyesofhawk continues to enlighten all of us with his supreme wisdom and insight

Will Ferrell Hair GIF
 
  • Like
Reactions: BroncHawk and 2D
Feb 4, 2004
144
306
63
AGAIN, there has NOT been improvement in "every aspect of the offense". It is a "factual statistic" that under Lester, the Iowa offense has gotten worse at its most important stat, wins.

I feel sorry for anyone who gives a darn about strength of schedule. Winning is ALWAYS hard.
Players and coaches don't give a **** about SOS
:ROFLMAO: Yup, Iowa has a 50% to win every game... Either they win or they don't. It doesn't matter if they're playing Ohio St or Northern IA
 

AnonymousNolonger

All-Conference
Jul 4, 2025
945
1,800
93
This is the exact thing I'm talking about. Can always count on 2D to come through.

AGAIN, there has NOT been improvement in "every aspect of the offense". It is a "factual statistic" that under Lester, the Iowa offense has gotten worse at its most important stat, wins.

I feel sorry for anyone who gives a darn about strength of schedule. Winning is ALWAYS hard.

Even for those who value SOS, it still isn't nearly important enough to justify the the lack of respect the team got for its winning, pre-Lester. It's not nearly important enough to justify the level of negativity around the program, pre-Lester.

And it isn't nearly important enough to justify the statement that, "Lester has made Iowa a better team". At least match the level winning that happened, pre-Lester, and a discussion can then be had about whether Iowa is a better program, and what that can be attributed to. I promise you every '25 team member would have traded their season for the '23 season of 10-4 with a division title. Players and coaches don't give a **** about SOS
No one could ever say you don’t try.

I’ll give you an E for effort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 83Hawk

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
2,191
2,482
113
God you're dumb. You know Iowa would have still won the West Division if it existed last year? I'm sure every team member would gladly trade last year to get shutout repeatedly in '23, idiot. 31-0, 26-0, 35-0. I'm sure they all thought after narrowly losing to two playoff teams including the eventual national champion that they could just go back to the glory days of getting beat like a rented mule.
Put it this way, there isn't a single member of the '23 team that would trade for the '25 season.

Yes, that '23 defense beat people like a rented mule. The excellence of a 10-2 regular season rewarded Iowa with two elite opponents in the postseason.

Blowouts are not noted in the final record column
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2D

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
2,191
2,482
113
Very few fans would believe that? For someone who is always harping on "false narratives", you keep pushing one about fans.

We all saw the QB struggles and dominance of Kaleb Johnson. And we all watched Gronowski struggle to pass for most of last season while setting a record for rushing td's.

Your posts are repetitive and you sound arrogant AF.
You're giving fans more credit than I.

I've certainly seen fans that are shocked to learn Lester has run it more.

Again, they pushed a laughable "run, run, pass" narrative for decades
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2D

BroncHawk

All-Conference
Jan 21, 2026
1,120
3,180
113
Put it this way, there isn't a single member of the '23 team that would trade for the '25 season.

Yes, that '23 defense beat people like a rented mule. The excellence of a 10-2 regular season rewarded Iowa with two elite opponents in the postseason.

Blowouts are not noted in the final record column
This 2025 team would have won 11 games in 2023. And actually scored against the three good teams we played.