Some of the comments from a lot of us, or sources etc being shared, are similar to national sports media talking about Clemson. People may know what they see from the outside, try to read the tea leaves or parse through the information, but true Clemson insiders are going to think some of the opinions are laughable. Because we know more about the second stringers, or know that such and such coach was covered up by Venables, or whatever it is. Happens all the time. Doesn't mean the national guys are all idiots, they just don't have the inside view. Likewise, a lot of people I see posting are just sharing information they find interesting or that seems plausible. And of course there are people that are closer to the inside, whether in the military, or living in the middle east (think this one is you), that are going to think those things are laughable.
Difference is I think many sharing things that insiders may think is laughable would take it well if insiders just gave the depth that person is missing and explained their inside point of view (I am pretty certain this is the case with @GDead_Tiger if not everyone), but rather I keep seeing people that actually likely have good perspective just laugh or send short messages, rather than actually adding the value of their insiders perspective.
Anyway, my two cents. Probably worth less.
