On today's ESPN website Jay Bilas lists his best 68 teams for '25-'26. Eleven Big Ten teams are included but not Iowa. Hawks are beaten out by such powerhouses as Belmont, McNeese, Liberty, and Akron, among others.
I think the Hawks still have a fair amount of work to do to ensure inclusion to the dance. Last night was a very good first step.On today's ESPN website Jay Bilas lists his best 68 teams for '25-'26. Eleven Big Ten teams are included but not Iowa. Hawks are beaten out by such powerhouses as Belmont, McNeese, Liberty, and Akron, among others.
On today's ESPN website Jay Bilas lists his best 68 teams for '25-'26. Eleven Big Ten teams are included but not Iowa. Hawks are beaten out by such powerhouses as Belmont, McNeese, Liberty, and Akron, among others.
He wasn’t predicting the field, he was ranking his top 68 teams. He had plenty of teams who won’t make the dance in the rankings.I think the Hawks still have a fair amount of work to do to ensure inclusion to the dance. Last night was a very good first step.
Right. There are always schools that get excluded because of guaranteed spots for small conference champions.He wasn’t predicting the field, he was ranking his top 68 teams. He had plenty of teams who won’t make the dance in the rankings.
So.. him not putting Iowa in his top 68 is even more egregious.Right. There are always schools that get excluded because of guaranteed spots for small conference champions.
This is a major insult to Iowa. Should be an incentive for Hawks to step it up.That is just absolutely stupid by Bilas.
Well yeah I guess. The top 50 or so teams plus the champions fron the smaller school conferences make up the field, so if Bilas was in charge, Iowa wouldn't be sniffing an at large birth.So.. him not putting Iowa in his top 68 is even more egregious.
That's what you get when you combine extreme bias with willful ignorance. Iowa is at least top 30 in KenPom and NET. That ESPN chap is an embarrassment to the sport. That's why on my list of the top 1,000 college basketball experts, that chap is nowhere to be seen.On today's ESPN website Jay Bilas lists his best 68 teams for '25-'26. Eleven Big Ten teams are included but not Iowa. Hawks are beaten out by such powerhouses as Belmont, McNeese, Liberty, and Akron, among others.
That is just absolutely stupid by Bilas.
Is he an 'anti-analytics' guy? How do he include 18-10 Illinois St. ?He wasn’t predicting the field, he was ranking his top 68 teams. He had plenty of teams who won’t make the dance in the rankings.
Yeah. In what metric is Washington > Iowa? NET? Nope. Kenpom? Nope. Adjusted O? Nope. Adjusted D? Nope. Overall record? Nope. Conference standings? Nope.When I read this the other day I saw Washington in the mid-40s and scrolled back up because I knew must have somehow skipped Iowa earlier. Nope!
Two more wins do it? That would be 21-10...I think the Hawks still have a fair amount of work to do to ensure inclusion to the dance. Last night was a very good first step.
I have a hard time with this guy anymore. He used to be tolerable, now he is PIA IMO.That is just absolutely stupid by Bilas.
This was less than a week after Wash. lost at home to PSU. 67th team Illinois st is 18-10 tied for 5th in MVC with Uni at 10-7 with zero wins over top 5 conf. Seriously did he accidentally forget about Iowa?When I read this the other day I saw Washington in the mid-40s and scrolled back up because I knew must have somehow skipped Iowa earlier. Nope!
I assume he just forgot about Iowa and it wasn't some intentional slight, but that's shoddy.This was less than a week after Wash. lost at home to PSU. 67th team Illinois st is 18-10 tied for 5th in MVC with Uni at 10-7 with zero wins over top 5 conf. Seriously did he accidentally forget about Iowa?
If not reminds me of espn’s awful college football fpi ratings. Which had LSU #3 after national title game year burrow led them to an undefeated season.