Democrat Party Analysis

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,238
3,797
113

I admit to a major bias against the entire Obamacare concept. To me, it was clear that the objectives of the program, while honorable, were simply not achievable the way the program was passed. The goals - make affordable care available to all 41 million Americans without insurance, better care though competition, major financial savings, no money from the federal government etc, simply violated the basic rules of economics. In the end, at least to this point, the Affordable care act has failed - in the aggregate based on goals, and has become unaffordable.

I'm all for creating a program that gets healthcare under control without bankrupting the country. It's disappointing that our leaders can't do what most businesses do..set the goals and then the means to achieve them. Rather they seem intent on just trying to score points
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,971
32,929
113
I admit to a major bias against the entire Obamacare concept. To me, it was clear that the objectives of the program, while honorable, were simply not achievable the way the program was passed. The goals - make affordable care available to all 41 million Americans without insurance, better care though competition, major financial savings, no money from the federal government etc, simply violated the basic rules of economics. In the end, at least to this point, the Affordable care act has failed - in the aggregate based on goals, and has become unaffordable.

I'm all for creating a program that gets healthcare under control without bankrupting the country. It's disappointing that our leaders can't do what most businesses do..set the goals and then the means to achieve them. Rather they seem intent on just trying to score points
I think their goal was to move us on the pathbtoward single payer health care so do not see any honor with it.
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,238
3,797
113
I think their goal was to move us on the pathbtoward single payer health care so do not see any honor with it.
I think you're correct. And, while the Democrats created this failed monster, republicans get part of the blame for just sitting out the creation. Had they sat down with democrats maybe we would have come up with a healthcare plan that works for the American people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

m.knox

All-Conference
Aug 20, 2003
2,697
2,716
113

Democrats Can’t Help but Side With America’s Enemies​


https://townhall.com/columnists/der...-help-but-side-with-americas-enemies-n2668830

We now control Venezuela. Nicolas Maduro, their former president, is now in American custody and will face trial in New York on major drug charges. And, as if on cue, Democrats are exposing themselves as being on the side of cartels and drugs, ending the lives of tens of thousands of Americans every year for the simple reason that President Donald Trump is on the other side. Yeah, they’re that sick.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,971
32,929
113


Things Democrats defend as of 2026:

Killing Babies
Grooming Children
Mutilating Children
Men in Girl’s Bathrooms
Anti-White Racism
Marxism
Unchecked Illegal Immigration
Healthcare for Illegal Immigrants
Housing Fraud
Massive Welfare Fraud
Free Flowing Drugs into America
Narco Terrorist Communist Dictators
Chinese, Russian, and Iranian Influence
Islamic Expansion

Things Democrats are against:

The US Constitution
Christianity
Individual Rights
Secure Borders
Secure Elections
The 1st and 2nd Amendments
American Exceptionalism

Which side are you on?
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,971
32,929
113


The political leaders who reacted negatively to the fall of Maduro have one thing in common: they are fellow Marxists, socialists, communists, or sympathizers who share the same worldview across the globe Maduro was able to cling to power for so long precisely because of their support, along with the cowardice and deliberate inaction of corrupt politicians in the United States.

I am glad to see President Trump take decisive action.
This is exactly how a narco-dictator in our own hemisphere should be confronted. It sends a clear and long-overdue message to communist regimes around the world—that America is back, and we will no longer tolerate threats to our country or our hemisphere.

It is time Americans understand that the danger is not only the physical threat of drugs flowing from Venezuela, but also the poisonous ideology of communism spreading within our own borders. And ask this question: do we want to be the next Venezuela?
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
29,146
21,272
113
The x post is factual though. Agree?
Hell no, this simpleton just pulls random, stupid **** out of it's *** and pretends like it's profound.

**** like:

Democrats didn't clap at the State of the Union

Drew a cartoon of Trump and Putin on a horse

Gave a pet cat to a Haitian

TREASON
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,971
32,929
113


Read the room, America:

The Democrats don’t want US to be a 2-party state anymore.

They've transformed our republic into a battlefield of unyielding opposition.

EXHIBIT A: When was the last time they collaborated with Republicans on any meaningful legislation?

EXHIBIT B: When did they refrain from waging relentless war against a duly elected president?

EXHIBIT C: When was the last time they didn't obstruct every initiative with partisan venom?

Just "THEATRE," you say?

Then why do they mass import foreign voters to rig future elections in their favor?

Why do they perpetually protest and undermine the will of "We the People"—the mandates we voted for, the policies we demanded?

No exceptions.
No bipartisanship.

Just an endless civil war, fueled by division and disdain for compromise.

Is this the conduct of a party committed to democracy, or the hallmark of authoritarians who tolerate only their own rule?

America, we're facing a profound crisis: a faction that rejects pluralism in pursuit of perpetual power.

It's time to ACCEPT AND CONFRONT this threat - before it dismantles the very foundations of our freedom.

God Save America!🇺🇸
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,971
32,929
113
This brit describes the current state of the UK. This dystopian hellhole is what the American left wants to implement here in the US.



I've gained lots of new followers from the USA, Australia and Canada. 🇺🇸🇦🇺🇨🇦

You people feel our pain here in the UK. You're our friends and allies. You understand how socialism is destroying society, how illegal immigrants are abusing our hospitality and how ridiculous green energy projects, like Mad Miliband's windmills, are bankrupting us.

Let me explain:

Every week dinghies full of hundreds of foreigners from the Middle East and Africa are making their way across the English Channel from France. And our government and Border Force allow them in. They're put on coaches and taken to 4* hotels, given 3 meals a day, free and immediate medical care and dentistry, things British people can only dream of. They're also given around 45 pounds a week spending money. From our taxes. Our government have paid the French government millions of pounds to stop these illegal dinghy crossings. And the French have done nothing in return. Trump is correct. Starmer and Macron need to sort out the UK and France. Quickly.

Trump is also correct about London. Our historic capital city that so many of you reading this will have memories of.
A city that's been ruined by high crime rates and a British population who have been driven out to seek their futures elsewhere. The majority of social housing in London is occupied by people who weren't born in the UK - they're mostly Somalian - who've arrived in the UK by illegal means and are also claiming benefits. All the while British people, including veterans, sleep in freezing shop doorways. Mayor Khan is a disgrace. Donald Trump is right. Again.

And what happens if foreign criminals commit an offence while here? Our ridiculous human rights laws allow them to stay here, just like the Albanian criminal who, a judge decided, couldn't be deported because his young son didn't like the chicken nuggets back in Albania. This isn't a joke. Google it.

While a black British Christian nurse has been fighting for her job. Why? Because she refused to call a convicted male paedophile by female pronouns. He abused the nurse and called her the 'N' word three times. But is was she who was placed in front of a tribunal to save her job. This is woke socialism that must be resisted.

And woe betide you if you use the wrong words on social media. You'll be locked up. Like Lucy Connolly and Wayne O'Rourke and thousands of others. Look up their cases. It'll astound you. So when Keir Starmer told Donald Trump we have free speech here in the UK, we don't. We really don't.

We have hope here in the UK. Our only hope. A Reform government at the next election headed by our own Donald Trump type person - Nigel Farage. It is our last and only hope.

Please take the time to read this and tell your friends because our country was a country you had fond memories of and it means a lot to us to know you think of us and pray for us. 🇬🇧🙏
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,971
32,929
113
Notice the remark from Assange stating that the democrat party keeps its money in Canada and why.

 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,238
3,797
113

is there a chance that this article itself isn't part of a psyop...?

the thing is, IMO, our media gives far too much attention to the minority creating the chaos. Minneapolis has about 430000 inhabitants. The most I have seen reported as protesters in 1,000. So maybe the reports are wrong and the true number is double that - 2000.
That means significantly less than 1% of the people are protesting. I know it's news but really 2,000 protesters drive the news cycle? In a business environment, a manager likely wouldn't spend 10 minutes in any given day on the issue.
 

ANEW

All-Conference
Jul 7, 2023
2,175
3,076
113
is there a chance that this article itself isn't part of a psyop...?

the thing is, IMO, our media gives far too much attention to the minority creating the chaos. Minneapolis has about 430000 inhabitants. The most I have seen reported as protesters in 1,000. So maybe the reports are wrong and the true number is double that - 2000.
That means significantly less than 1% of the people are protesting. I know it's news but really 2,000 protesters drive the news cycle? In a business environment, a manager likely wouldn't spend 10 minutes in any given day on the issue.
And 0.000465116279% of those inhabitants have been killed.
 

m.knox

All-Conference
Aug 20, 2003
2,697
2,716
113
is there a chance that this article itself isn't part of a psyop...?

the thing is, IMO, our media gives far too much attention to the minority creating the chaos. Minneapolis has about 430000 inhabitants. The most I have seen reported as protesters in 1,000. So maybe the reports are wrong and the true number is double that - 2000.
That means significantly less than 1% of the people are protesting. I know it's news but really 2,000 protesters drive the news cycle? In a business environment, a manager likely wouldn't spend 10 minutes in any given day on the issue.

It's a tactic. "Never let a good crisis go to waste." In this case, the real crisis was Biden and Co. letting anyone and everyone cross the border for the simple reason that Trump didn't.
 
Last edited:

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,971
32,929
113
This is where the dems wanted to take us.....to hell. Thank God for President Trump.



Think about this for a moment. I mean really think about this. What if Trump lost. What if the Dems were able to pull off another steal. Does anyone realize where we were headed? I mean really headed?

The Democrats opened our borders to the world.
The Democrats wanted to end the police.
The Democrats didn’t want criminals kept in jail
The Democrats have now embraced crime
Think about the drugs flowing in
Think about all the child trafficking
Think about the violent gangs who would’ve been running our streets

They now embrace foreign flags yet don’t stand up to the one they all took an oath for
The Ukraine ATM would be up and running
Israel would’ve been cut off
Illegals would be getting free healthcare and welfare benefits
Taxes would be raised to the point where you have nothing left in your paycheck
We would be living under their mandates
Every amendment gone.
Our freedoms gone.
Our voices gone.
This post wouldn’t be allowed.
Our military would be decimated

Our children?
Would continue to be brainwashed into doing everything their way.
Personal servants
Child pornography would become legal
Underage sex would become legal.
The fake news media would be the voice of the land.
A statue of George Soros would be sitting in the White House

Our stores would be government run.
Gas cars would be gone and no one would be able to afford one anyway.
Insurance? No one would be able to afford it
Energy bills? Many would have no heat or lights that is if they were still able to afford where they live
Medical would become universal. What that means is don’t get sick and definitely don’t need surgery. You’ll die before that day ever comes.

As for quality of life? They’ll be none. They want to kill us off because these crazed liberals want us dead in the name of climate change.

Ladies and gentlemen. What I just laid out is Communism. That’s what it would look like under Communism leadership.
The Mamdanis and the guy with the 200 watt lightbulb head from Minnesota were the beginning of laying the groundwork in blue city strongholds. At least the right people put an end to the lightbulb head Somalian but the trouble in Minnesota is still brewing. Government officials want to oppose law and order. They want to protect their coverup in all the fraud. Their own Mayor is declaring war on ICE. These crazy Dem leaders feel they all have a license to steal. Wait until they hit Gavin’s California

When I say really think, that is exactly where we were headed under Kamala. She would’ve been the end of our elections. The Constitution would be burned in flames. Our founding fathers who fought for their lives to give us our freedoms would be rolling in their graves

Now I don’t consider myself a religious man but I am a Catholic, I did make my communion and confirmation. I do believe in God.

If you just witnessed the entire journey Trump had to take to get here, there is no other way explain it other than being Gods work

Trump was hand delivered by God. Say what you want but Trump surviving on that stage was Divine Intervention. There is no other explanation. God chose Trump to save us from the evil. He chose a strong man with a ton of resiliency to lead the way. Everything is for a reason. Everything Trump endured was for a reason. It was God’s test of attrition. It was a test to see if Trump was the right person to lead us from the doldrums and the grip of Communism.

The rest is obvious. Trump not only passed the test but is here standing tall, delivering on all promises and delivering for all the people.

A Kamala victory is a distant memory. It was never to be. God delivered us Trump and Trump took care of the rest. Now we are all here, all fighting together, fighting for our America. We are MAGA and we are God’s children. The United States is now in the right hands. Trump’s hands. Thank you God for saving us all and saving our country. In God We Trust. In Trump We Persevere. God Bless you all. My two cents
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,971
32,929
113
Another liberal cured of the woke mind virus. There is hope.



A Letter to the Left

To those who still believe, from someone who once did too.

I need to tell you something, and I need you to hear me out before you decide what I am.

I was one of you. Not in some distant, theoretical way. I was deeply one of you. I marched. I shared the posts. I believed, with total conviction, that the progressive vision of the world was not only morally correct but self-evidently so. Anyone who disagreed was ignorant or malicious. I had Trump Derangement Syndrome, but then, I complained about all politicians. I couldn’t see it was a case of choosing ‘the best of’. I had no middle ground.

And that’s what finally shook me awake: the realisation that I had stopped allowing for middle ground. My thinking had become entirely black and white. I had radicalised—slowly, invisibly—without even noticing it was happening to me.

The moment of clarity didn’t arrive dramatically. It crept in through the small, uncomfortable questions I started asking myself. Why was I so certain? Why did I feel such fury toward anyone who hesitated, even slightly, on positions I held? When had I stopped thinking and started simply reacting?

When I tried to share these doubts with friends and family—people I loved, people on my side—I wasn’t met with conversation. I was met with a wall. A similar wall to what I had previously put up for anyone daring to question me and my positions.

“No discussion.” “You’ve gone right-wing.” Lies were constructed about my motives. It didn’t matter that I was asking questions in good faith. The act of questioning was itself the crime.

That is not normal. A political movement that forbids its own members from thinking critically is not a movement for justice. It’s something else entirely. And it worried me then. It worries me more now.

Do you remember the 1980s and 1990s? I do. We had done real, meaningful work on race relations. Most people in the West genuinely did not care about the colour of your skin. Were things perfect? Of course not. But we were heading somewhere good. We were building something.

And then we pulled it apart. We decided that every small, clumsy human interaction was a “microaggression.” We reframed the past as one hundred percent negative, as though nothing decent had ever been achieved. We became so obsessed with naming every tiny slight that we forgot what real progress looked like. We unstitched the good work and called it enlightenment.

Once I began looking with honest eyes, the contradictions were everywhere. We decided blackface was a mortal sin. But woman face? That was brave and fabulous. We insisted entire societies must be restructured to accommodate the preferences of fractions of a percent of the population, and if you questioned the pace or method, you were a bigot, evil or fascist.

We pursued reckonings for the crimes of Western civilisation—slavery, church child abuse, colonisation—and those reckonings were important. But we stopped there. Only the West was held to account. The trans-Atlantic slave trade was a horror, yes. But it was the British who ended it. Meanwhile, the Islamic slave trade ran for centuries, and pockets of it persist to this day. Where is that reckoning? Who is demanding it?

We created a world in which nobody is allowed to simply settle and build a life. Indigenous people must perpetually identify as victims. Everyone of European descent must perpetually identify as perpetrators—for events centuries old. Yet nobody seems interested in acknowledging that white Westerners were not history’s only colonisers, or that colonisation, in softer forms, is happening right now.

Mass immigration into Western countries is a form of soft colonisation. That sentence will make some of you furious. But consider: why is it only European and other Western nations being pressured to “diversify”? No one bags Nigeria or China or Latin American nations for a lack of diversity and not promoting the idea of multiculturalism. Only white-majority countries are told their cultures must be diluted or they are racist. Wanting to preserve the native peoples and cultures of European nations is not xenophobia. It is a right that in the 21st century we wish to grant to every non-white culture on earth. But apparently it’s a sin to want it or expect it for ourselves.

And when it comes specifically to Islamic immigration into Western democracies, there are countless videos—not propaganda, but Muslims speaking plainly—describing a vision in which the world becomes Islamic, in which Sharia law replaces secular governance, in which their growing numbers translate to growing power. These are not conspiracy theories. These are now publicly stated intentions. History tells us what happens when these numbers reach a tipping point: the freedoms we take for granted begin to erode. Some know this because they are ex-Muslims. Some know because they are Westerners who converted to Islam and found it wanting. Frightening, even. Expressing that concern is not Islamophobia. It is pattern recognition.

Being concerned about how trans medicine affects young people is not transphobic. Asking how trans ideology impacts women’s rights and the gay and lesbian community is not bigotry. These are legitimate questions that deserve honest answers, not silencing.

So much of what I had taken for granted on the left collapsed under the lightest touch of common sense. I had to accept something I’d been resisting for years: the world will never be perfect. It won’t. And if you spend your one and only life railing against the world because it refuses to become your utopia, you will lose. Worse, you will drag the rest of us down with you. Constantly tearing society apart because it cannot meet an impossible standard doesn’t make you righteous. It makes you destructive.

What I did instead was start asking a different question: ‘What’s the optimal way to improve this?’ Not achieve perfection (#impossible). Not burn it all down and rebuild a utopia from the ashes (also impossible). Just better. What specifically needs improving, and how do we do it? That shift—from ideological fury to practical problem-solving—changed everything for me.

So those are the things that drove me away from the left. Not toward the right, but away from what the left has become: reactive, unquestioning, hostile to dissent, and increasingly detached from reality. I wasn’t changed by the right, I was changed by the left. My left.

If the West is going to survive—and I think it’s that serious at this point—the left has to start thinking again. Questioning again. Demanding evidence instead of demanding obedience.

So I’m asking you—begging you, really—to think. Consider that an alternate view might not be hatred. Consider that you may have been wrong about some things. I was. That’s not a confession of weakness. Admitting a mistake and choosing a different path is braver than marching further down a road you already suspect is leading somewhere dark.

You are not a bad person for questioning. You are not a traitor for thinking. The people who tell you otherwise are not protecting you. They are controlling you.

That’s all I ask. Just think. Please.
 
  • Like
Reactions: m.knox

m.knox

All-Conference
Aug 20, 2003
2,697
2,716
113
Another liberal cured of the woke mind virus. There is hope.



A Letter to the Left

To those who still believe, from someone who once did too.

I need to tell you something, and I need you to hear me out before you decide what I am.

I was one of you. Not in some distant, theoretical way. I was deeply one of you. I marched. I shared the posts. I believed, with total conviction, that the progressive vision of the world was not only morally correct but self-evidently so. Anyone who disagreed was ignorant or malicious. I had Trump Derangement Syndrome, but then, I complained about all politicians. I couldn’t see it was a case of choosing ‘the best of’. I had no middle ground.

And that’s what finally shook me awake: the realisation that I had stopped allowing for middle ground. My thinking had become entirely black and white. I had radicalised—slowly, invisibly—without even noticing it was happening to me.

The moment of clarity didn’t arrive dramatically. It crept in through the small, uncomfortable questions I started asking myself. Why was I so certain? Why did I feel such fury toward anyone who hesitated, even slightly, on positions I held? When had I stopped thinking and started simply reacting?

When I tried to share these doubts with friends and family—people I loved, people on my side—I wasn’t met with conversation. I was met with a wall. A similar wall to what I had previously put up for anyone daring to question me and my positions.

“No discussion.” “You’ve gone right-wing.” Lies were constructed about my motives. It didn’t matter that I was asking questions in good faith. The act of questioning was itself the crime.

That is not normal. A political movement that forbids its own members from thinking critically is not a movement for justice. It’s something else entirely. And it worried me then. It worries me more now.

Do you remember the 1980s and 1990s? I do. We had done real, meaningful work on race relations. Most people in the West genuinely did not care about the colour of your skin. Were things perfect? Of course not. But we were heading somewhere good. We were building something.

And then we pulled it apart. We decided that every small, clumsy human interaction was a “microaggression.” We reframed the past as one hundred percent negative, as though nothing decent had ever been achieved. We became so obsessed with naming every tiny slight that we forgot what real progress looked like. We unstitched the good work and called it enlightenment.

Once I began looking with honest eyes, the contradictions were everywhere. We decided blackface was a mortal sin. But woman face? That was brave and fabulous. We insisted entire societies must be restructured to accommodate the preferences of fractions of a percent of the population, and if you questioned the pace or method, you were a bigot, evil or fascist.

We pursued reckonings for the crimes of Western civilisation—slavery, church child abuse, colonisation—and those reckonings were important. But we stopped there. Only the West was held to account. The trans-Atlantic slave trade was a horror, yes. But it was the British who ended it. Meanwhile, the Islamic slave trade ran for centuries, and pockets of it persist to this day. Where is that reckoning? Who is demanding it?

We created a world in which nobody is allowed to simply settle and build a life. Indigenous people must perpetually identify as victims. Everyone of European descent must perpetually identify as perpetrators—for events centuries old. Yet nobody seems interested in acknowledging that white Westerners were not history’s only colonisers, or that colonisation, in softer forms, is happening right now.

Mass immigration into Western countries is a form of soft colonisation. That sentence will make some of you furious. But consider: why is it only European and other Western nations being pressured to “diversify”? No one bags Nigeria or China or Latin American nations for a lack of diversity and not promoting the idea of multiculturalism. Only white-majority countries are told their cultures must be diluted or they are racist. Wanting to preserve the native peoples and cultures of European nations is not xenophobia. It is a right that in the 21st century we wish to grant to every non-white culture on earth. But apparently it’s a sin to want it or expect it for ourselves.

And when it comes specifically to Islamic immigration into Western democracies, there are countless videos—not propaganda, but Muslims speaking plainly—describing a vision in which the world becomes Islamic, in which Sharia law replaces secular governance, in which their growing numbers translate to growing power. These are not conspiracy theories. These are now publicly stated intentions. History tells us what happens when these numbers reach a tipping point: the freedoms we take for granted begin to erode. Some know this because they are ex-Muslims. Some know because they are Westerners who converted to Islam and found it wanting. Frightening, even. Expressing that concern is not Islamophobia. It is pattern recognition.

Being concerned about how trans medicine affects young people is not transphobic. Asking how trans ideology impacts women’s rights and the gay and lesbian community is not bigotry. These are legitimate questions that deserve honest answers, not silencing.

So much of what I had taken for granted on the left collapsed under the lightest touch of common sense. I had to accept something I’d been resisting for years: the world will never be perfect. It won’t. And if you spend your one and only life railing against the world because it refuses to become your utopia, you will lose. Worse, you will drag the rest of us down with you. Constantly tearing society apart because it cannot meet an impossible standard doesn’t make you righteous. It makes you destructive.

What I did instead was start asking a different question: ‘What’s the optimal way to improve this?’ Not achieve perfection (#impossible). Not burn it all down and rebuild a utopia from the ashes (also impossible). Just better. What specifically needs improving, and how do we do it? That shift—from ideological fury to practical problem-solving—changed everything for me.

So those are the things that drove me away from the left. Not toward the right, but away from what the left has become: reactive, unquestioning, hostile to dissent, and increasingly detached from reality. I wasn’t changed by the right, I was changed by the left. My left.

If the West is going to survive—and I think it’s that serious at this point—the left has to start thinking again. Questioning again. Demanding evidence instead of demanding obedience.

So I’m asking you—begging you, really—to think. Consider that an alternate view might not be hatred. Consider that you may have been wrong about some things. I was. That’s not a confession of weakness. Admitting a mistake and choosing a different path is braver than marching further down a road you already suspect is leading somewhere dark.

You are not a bad person for questioning. You are not a traitor for thinking. The people who tell you otherwise are not protecting you. They are controlling you.

That’s all I ask. Just think. Please.


I just read this on X and came here to post it...... Great summary of the left.

There is hope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls